link?PhiloBeddo » 29 Dec 2023, 9:24 pm » wrote: ↑ Now they are doing it 100 x's worse. Trying to eliminate opponents.
PhiloBeddo » 29 Dec 2023, 9:24 pm » wrote: ↑ Now they are doing it 100 x's worse. Trying to eliminate opponents.
Yeah insurrection.is constitutionally barring for president.
The constitution doesn't say charged.
That's not voter suppression Einstein.PhiloBeddo » 29 Dec 2023, 9:24 pm » wrote: ↑ Now they are doing it 100 x's worse. Trying to eliminate opponents.
FIFY....
He doesn't understand that.
Voter elimination....banana republic style...
If you do insurrection the constitution says you can't be president.PhiloBeddo » 29 Dec 2023, 9:24 pm » wrote: ↑ Now they are doing it 100 x's worse. Trying to eliminate opponents.
Bidencrimefamily » 29 Dec 2023, 9:42 pm » wrote: ↑ Yeah insurrection.is constitutionally barring for president.
PhiloBeddo » 29 Dec 2023, 9:24 pm » wrote: ↑ Now they are doing it 100 x's worse. Trying to eliminate opponents.
No, they aren't...PhiloBeddo » 29 Dec 2023, 9:24 pm » wrote: ↑ Now they are doing it 100 x's worse. Trying to eliminate opponents.
R.Suave » 30 Dec 2023, 6:37 pm » wrote: ↑![]()
Where are you standing on the integrity of the 2020 election today, Toady?
Just the answer, not Meltdown ReduxHuey » 30 Dec 2023, 7:07 pm » wrote: ↑ DIckhead, you know where I stand on that. I see you are back to trolling.
Now, once that list of questions you have asked me dozen of times over the years I swear I will answer each and everyone one more time. If I don't provide an answer I will leave for a week. I will get CP to turn of my log in.
Until then don't stalk me with questions you already know the answer to.