Z09 » 31 Dec 2023, 7:49 am » wrote: ↑ Because the Sec of State s don't have the privilege.
And there's no charges or conviction for insurrection
Article 1, Section 4 of the Constitution explains that the States have the primary authority over election administration, the "times, places, and manner of holding elections".
Point to it.
BFC loves to project...Z09 » 31 Dec 2023, 6:01 am » wrote: ↑ The link you posted...
Never gave any actual names from anyone that heard him say he was worried
You have HIVGHETTOBLASTER » 31 Dec 2023, 7:35 am » wrote: ↑ I think you're more scared that TRUMP WILL TAKE AWAY YOUR FREE HIV TREATMENTS![]()
GHETTOBLASTER » 23 Dec 2023, 1:55 pm » wrote: ↑ I want to live where gasoline is $2.59. So tell me this...where do you live...?
GHETTOBLASTER » 23 Dec 2023, 3:14 pm » wrote: ↑ I've got a vacant lot in Santa Cruz that's worth twice as much as your average house in Muncie Indiana...!!!
then STFU...plain, simple...Bidencrimefamily » 31 Dec 2023, 6:57 am » wrote: ↑ I'm not going to argue about it when the Supreme Court is going to rule on it in a few days hopefully.
^^^ triggered because goto CNN turncoated...R.Suave » 31 Dec 2023, 7:52 am » wrote: ↑ because CNN said "might"
And you bristle when I call you a dumb hole who only rebleats what she has been told.
No I like pointing out that the supremes that Trump appointed lied when they said Roe vs wafe was settled law under oath. Pointing out they are not honest dealers is not discussing the current case.
Save time, run now, Rog.
he told them to "MARCH PEACEFULLY" and to "GO HOME IN PEACE"...R.Suave » 31 Dec 2023, 7:58 am » wrote: ↑ Point to it.
Section 3. No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may, by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
Dimwit,
tone down on the RN bit...
We are getting used to the Supremes that Trump appointed getting bribed and lying to us.ROG62 » 31 Dec 2023, 8:28 am » wrote: ↑ he told them to "MARCH PEACEFULLY" and to "GO HOME IN PEACE"...
now tell us which part indicates he's "engaged"...GO!
For over an hour?ROG62 » 31 Dec 2023, 8:28 am » wrote: ↑ he told them to "MARCH PEACEFULLY" and to "GO HOME IN PEACE"...
now tell us which part indicates he's "engaged"...GO!
That's not your call, Cracker.
tone down on the RN bit...
Because unlike ******* slack jawed MAGAts, Grifty understands that any such decision hinges on the desires of Alito's sponsors. If Grifty is no longer useful to them, Sammy will be told to order Free Ride and The Handmaid to Stand Down.Bidencrimefamily » 31 Dec 2023, 5:22 am » wrote: ↑ https://l.smartnews.com/p-A5h4z/xYX9b7
Trump worried conservative Supreme Court justices will rule against him on states’ ballots, says reportGustaf KilanderDonald Trump is reportedly concerned that some conservative justices on the Supreme Court – half of which he appointed – may rule against him after he was removed from the ballots in several states under the 14th Amendment’s ban on insurrectionists holding public office.
your mom taught you how to milk horsesR.Suave » 31 Dec 2023, 8:37 am » wrote: ↑ Because unlike ******* slack jawed MAGAts, Grifty understands that any such decision hinges on the desires of Alito's sponsors. If Grifty is no longer useful to them, Sammy will be told to order Free Ride and The Handmaid to Stand Down.
My guess is that SCOTUS may punt on all the substantive issues, perhaps offer some jibber jabber about the definition of "officer".