Liberal Forum

R.Suave » 31 Dec 2023, 9:03 am » wrote: ↑

31 Dec 2023, 9:03 am

Did your mommy shut your mailbox?

my mom is dead
 

Hehehe
Of course trump is scared.
He ran to an underground bunker when faced with protesters.
He doesn't have a spine. Like his supporters.

POM » 31 Dec 2023, 9:06 am » wrote: ↑

31 Dec 2023, 9:06 am

my mom is dead

Did you stuff her in your mailbox, pousey?

R. Suave » 31 Dec 2023, 9:03 am » wrote: ↑

31 Dec 2023, 9:03 am

Did your mommy shut your mailbox?

Shame your brain only learned to mind corrupted ideas after birth. You might have become human thinking beyond the idea anything is possible since you never accept life is limited to your sole surviving the moment here.

R.Suave » 31 Dec 2023, 9:07 am » wrote: ↑

31 Dec 2023, 9:07 am

Did you stuff her in your mailbox, pousey?

NO QUESTIONS DICK SUCKER   

Z09 » 31 Dec 2023, 9:11 am » wrote: ↑

31 Dec 2023, 9:11 am

Did you open the link?

There's no name from the person that claims Trump is scared

How does the author of this article know Trump is scared?

Really. Back in 2012, Gorsuch was a judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. In that capacity, he wrote the panel opinion in Hassan v. Colorado. Hassan, a naturalized citizen, sued Colorado, arguing it was required to put him on the presidential ballot even though he was not a natural-born citizen and was therefore not constitutionally qualified to run for president. The Tenth Circuit ruled against him, with Gorsuch writing that states have “a legitimate interest in protecting the integrity and practical functioning of the political process” and that because of that, they can “exclude from the ballot candidates who are constitutionally prohibited from assuming office.” It’s that quote that makes its way into the Colorado Supreme Court opinion

Z09 » 31 Dec 2023, 9:11 am » wrote: ↑

31 Dec 2023, 9:11 am

Did you open the link?


 

  I don't eat canned potatoes.

 

Z09 » 31 Dec 2023, 9:19 am » wrote: ↑

31 Dec 2023, 9:19 am

????

WTF..

So some guy that wasn't even born in this country wanted to run for president?

You compare this with Trump?

   Hehehe
 

R.Suave » 31 Dec 2023, 8:50 am » wrote: ↑

31 Dec 2023, 8:50 am

You're hurt....I get that...

I'm not the one with glistening trou trou...

back to your box...
 

ROG62 » 31 Dec 2023, 10:17 am » wrote: ↑

31 Dec 2023, 10:17 am

I'm not the one with glistening trou trou...

back to your box...

Let me guess you're going to vote for the guy that's afraid to debate. 

ROG62 » 31 Dec 2023, 10:17 am » wrote: ↑

31 Dec 2023, 10:17 am

I'm not the one with glistening trou trou...

back to your box...

Please stop inventing reason to stare that way at my trou trou...

Bidencrimefamily » 31 Dec 2023, 10:18 am » wrote: ↑

31 Dec 2023, 10:18 am

Let me guess you're going to vote for the guy that's afraid to debate.

joe? I'd rather be disemboweled...
 

KEY WORD 'INTENT'.

biden had no 'intention' of overthrowing usa government. all made up by democrat politicians.

Bidencrimefamily » 31 Dec 2023, 5:57 am » wrote: ↑

31 Dec 2023, 5:57 am

I think he is sweeting it. He had three supremes as president. If you read the 14th it's pretty clear. But he did nominate these guys.

So maybe you should read the 14th amendment in total. few lines past section 3. What morons Biden voters are. You hate democracy don't you along with justice and freedom. Retard.

Section 3 No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability. 

Section 4 The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.

 Section 5 The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
 
 
 

Bidencrimefamily » 31 Dec 2023, 5:22 am » wrote: ↑

31 Dec 2023, 5:22 am

Trump worried conservative Supreme Court justices will rule against him on states’ ballots, says reportGustaf Kilander….

If any concern is valid, you need to hope to God they don’t pull something very stupid that would tear the country completely apart a la the Civil War, and destroy all future presidencies. It’s a complete political hack job,  just like the political indictments.

I implore you think it through for the good of the future of the country and not give in to your short term abject hatred for the man. I believe you are decent enough to do so.

 
 

Tempest62 » 31 Dec 2023, 12:49 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Dec 2023, 12:49 pm

If any concern is valid, you need to hope to God they don’t pull something very stupid that would tear the country completely apart a la the Civil War, and destroy all future presidencies. It’s a complete political hack job,  just like the political indictments.

I implore you think it through for the good of the future of the country and not give in to your short term abject hatred for the man. I believe you are decent enough to do so.

You can implore all you want but that idiot is a bot, programmed by retard bot programmers and no individual thought is possible.

FredH » 31 Dec 2023, 1:04 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Dec 2023, 1:04 pm

You can implore all you want but that idiot is a bot, programmed by retard bot programmers and no individual thought is possible.

Agreed, I suffer from giving the benefit of the doubt when I probably shouldn’t, my attitude in those situations has rightfully had me in trouble with my wife over the years.

It seems to me several on this board are hopelessly mired  in the false left vs. right paradigm rather than correctly evaluating what is actually up vs. down.