Just spotted this in the NYTBecause unlike ******* slack jawed MAGAts, Grifty understands that any such decision hinges on the desires of Alito's sponsors. If Grifty is no longer useful to them, Sammy will be told to order Free Ride and The Handmaid to Stand Down.
R.Suave » 31 Dec 2023, 4:04 pm » wrote: ↑ Today, 8:37 am
Just spotted this in the NYT
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/15/us/s ... rtion.htmlOn Feb. 10 last year, Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. showed his eight colleagues how he intended to uproot the constitutional right to abortion.
At 11:16 a.m., his clerk circulated a 98-page draft opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. After a justice shares an opinion inside the court, other members scrutinize it. Those in the majority can request revisions, sometimes as the price of their votes, sweating sentences or even words.
But this time, despite the document’s length, Justice Neil M. Gorsuch wrote back just 10 minutes later to say that he would sign on to the opinion and had no changes, according to two people who reviewed the messages. The next morning, Justice Clarence Thomas added his name, then Justice Amy Coney Barrett, and days later, Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh. None requested a single alteration. The responses looked like a display of conservative force and discipline.
Has @Vegas EVER read the tea leaves like this?
I challenge him to show me...
That's another concrete example of Level 27 Analysis....it's called "Omniscience"...
You going to be here all night because you can't get laidR.Suave » 31 Dec 2023, 5:35 pm » wrote: ↑ That's another concrete example of Level 27 Analysis....it's called "Omniscience"...
Show me one where you got the basic facts correct.
The tea bagger challenge......R.Suave » 31 Dec 2023, 4:04 pm » wrote: ↑ Today, 8:37 am
Has @Vegas EVER read the tea leaves like this?
I challenge him to show me...
Weren't you a proud teabagger for years?RebelGator » 31 Dec 2023, 5:51 pm » wrote: ↑ The tea bagger challenge......![]()
The subliminal messaging is so thick, suaver boy can just taste it.
1) This Op Ed is behind a paywallR.Suave » 31 Dec 2023, 4:04 pm » wrote: ↑ Today, 8:37 am
Just spotted this in the NYT
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/15/us/s ... rtion.htmlOn Feb. 10 last year, Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. showed his eight colleagues how he intended to uproot the constitutional right to abortion.
At 11:16 a.m., his clerk circulated a 98-page draft opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. After a justice shares an opinion inside the court, other members scrutinize it. Those in the majority can request revisions, sometimes as the price of their votes, sweating sentences or even words.
But this time, despite the document’s length, Justice Neil M. Gorsuch wrote back just 10 minutes later to say that he would sign on to the opinion and had no changes, according to two people who reviewed the messages. The next morning, Justice Clarence Thomas added his name, then Justice Amy Coney Barrett, and days later, Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh. None requested a single alteration. The responses looked like a display of conservative force and discipline.
Has @Vegas EVER read the tea leaves like this?
I challenge him to show me...
1) Times gives you free peeksRedheadedStranger » 31 Dec 2023, 6:07 pm » wrote: ↑ 1) This Op Ed is behind a paywall
2) It's the New York Slimes
That is all...
1) I'm not getting a freebie on this one.R.Suave » 31 Dec 2023, 6:09 pm » wrote: ↑ 1) Times gives you free peeks
2) You won't name your sources, so spare me.
enuf said...RedheadedStranger » 31 Dec 2023, 6:07 pm » wrote: ↑ 1) This Op Ed is behind a paywall
2) It's the New York Slimes
That is all...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
1) Hook up through your local public library...RedheadedStranger » 31 Dec 2023, 6:18 pm » wrote: ↑ 1) I'm not getting a freebie on this one.
2) I post a link to the source every time I quote a news story. I just put it at the bottom of the post and not the top, like you do.
I just did, again....read the OP.Vegas » 31 Dec 2023, 7:24 pm » wrote: ↑ You first. No copy/paste ****. Let's see if you got your basic facts right.
Yeah, that's what I thought.
1) Sure... I'm gonna drive up to the public library so I can read a New York Slimes Op Ed.R.Suave » 31 Dec 2023, 7:45 pm » wrote: ↑ 1) Hook up through your local public library...
2) Whenever I ask you to name your 3 primary sources, I get the wutwut dance.
The first one IS my thoughts, you braindead pile of goat ****.Vegas » 31 Dec 2023, 7:49 pm » wrote: ↑ I said no copy/paste you *******. YOUR thoughts mother ****!
Idiot. Retard. Loser. Punk. Coward. Moron. *******.
1) online, doltRedheadedStranger » 31 Dec 2023, 7:50 pm » wrote: ↑ 1) Sure... I'm gonna drive up to the public library so I can read a New York Slimes Op Ed.
2) As I stated, I always cite my sources when posting copyrighted material.
You do know how to click a link, right?
Facts defend denial. Genetic results defines the specificity of each ancestor alive in the entire food chain adapting in space now.R. Suave » 31 Dec 2023, 5:35 pm » wrote: ↑ That's another concrete example of Level 27 Analysis....it's called "Omniscience"...
Show me one where you got the basic facts correct.