Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
No, Buttwipes, it was NOT AN INSURRECTION. And never will be.
No, Buttwipes, it was NOT AN INSURRECTION. And never will be.
By Beekeeper
6 Jan 2024 7:07 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
6 Jan 2024 7:07 am
Georgetown University Law Professor calls LWNJ ****, well, more grasping at straws to DESTROY DEMOCRACY!!
The biggest problem for me is that the 14th Amendment, Section Three, deals with rebellion and/or insurrection. This was neither. This was a riot and at some point, mature minds have got to kick in here and say, look, he has never even been charged with incitement, let alone rebellion and insurrection. But more importantly, putting aside the fact that he hasn't been convicted, this wasn't a rebellion or insurrection. I know that the other side has really tried hard to portray it that way, but the American people don't even view it that way. Polls indicate that the public views this as a protest that became a riot. It doesn't excuse what happened. [...]
We've had violent protests in this country. There were violent protests when Trump was inaugurated. And at that time, there were Democratic members that voted not to certify Donald Trump. Were they also rebellious? What they're suggesting here is really otherworldly. If this is going to be the new theory, it'll be replicated, it'll metastasize throughout the country. I've got a column out in the New York Post talking about the new effort to bar Congressman [Scott] Perry under the same theory that Democratic members of Congress have asked to bar dozens of Republican members of Congress under the same theories. That's the slippery slope that we're about to step on. [...]
It's a tit-for-tat politics. And the terrible thing is that this is the most successful and stable democracy in the history of the world. And yet, after this long successful run, you have blind advocates today trying to introduce an instability in that system that could destroy it. This is the type of theory that can destroy a democracy. And, you know, there's a poll showing that the majority of people do not believe in this disqualification. Some 40% do, but it shows how dangerous this is. We are a divided country and you have people who are trying to win this election in the courts.
The biggest problem for me is that the 14th Amendment, Section Three, deals with rebellion and/or insurrection. This was neither. This was a riot and at some point, mature minds have got to kick in here and say, look, he has never even been charged with incitement, let alone rebellion and insurrection. But more importantly, putting aside the fact that he hasn't been convicted, this wasn't a rebellion or insurrection. I know that the other side has really tried hard to portray it that way, but the American people don't even view it that way. Polls indicate that the public views this as a protest that became a riot. It doesn't excuse what happened. [...]
We've had violent protests in this country. There were violent protests when Trump was inaugurated. And at that time, there were Democratic members that voted not to certify Donald Trump. Were they also rebellious? What they're suggesting here is really otherworldly. If this is going to be the new theory, it'll be replicated, it'll metastasize throughout the country. I've got a column out in the New York Post talking about the new effort to bar Congressman [Scott] Perry under the same theory that Democratic members of Congress have asked to bar dozens of Republican members of Congress under the same theories. That's the slippery slope that we're about to step on. [...]
It's a tit-for-tat politics. And the terrible thing is that this is the most successful and stable democracy in the history of the world. And yet, after this long successful run, you have blind advocates today trying to introduce an instability in that system that could destroy it. This is the type of theory that can destroy a democracy. And, you know, there's a poll showing that the majority of people do not believe in this disqualification. Some 40% do, but it shows how dangerous this is. We are a divided country and you have people who are trying to win this election in the courts.
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
6 Jan 2024 7:11 am
Jonathan Turley?Beekeeper » 06 Jan 2024, 8:07 am » wrote: ↑ Georgetown University Law Professor calls LWNJ ****, well, more grasping at straws to DESTROY DEMOCRACY!!
The biggest problem for me is that the 14th Amendment, Section Three, deals with rebellion and/or insurrection. This was neither. This was a riot and at some point, mature minds have got to kick in here and say, look, he has never even been charged with incitement, let alone rebellion and insurrection. But more importantly, putting aside the fact that he hasn't been convicted, this wasn't a rebellion or insurrection. I know that the other side has really tried hard to portray it that way, but the American people don't even view it that way. Polls indicate that the public views this as a protest that became a riot. It doesn't excuse what happened. [...]
We've had violent protests in this country. There were violent protests when Trump was inaugurated. And at that time, there were Democratic members that voted not to certify Donald Trump. Were they also rebellious? What they're suggesting here is really otherworldly. If this is going to be the new theory, it'll be replicated, it'll metastasize throughout the country. I've got a column out in the New York Post talking about the new effort to bar Congressman [Scott] Perry under the same theory that Democratic members of Congress have asked to bar dozens of Republican members of Congress under the same theories. That's the slippery slope that we're about to step on. [...]
It's a tit-for-tat politics. And the terrible thing is that this is the most successful and stable democracy in the history of the world. And yet, after this long successful run, you have blind advocates today trying to introduce an instability in that system that could destroy it. This is the type of theory that can destroy a democracy. And, you know, there's a poll showing that the majority of people do not believe in this disqualification. Some 40% do, but it shows how dangerous this is. We are a divided country and you have people who are trying to win this election in the courts.
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime”
LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened."
brown's unheeded words of wisdom 
6 Jan 2024 7:14 am
Does he have a name, ya **** loser?Beekeeper » 06 Jan 2024, 8:07 am » wrote: ↑ Georgetown University Law Professor calls LWNJ ****, well, more grasping at straws to DESTROY DEMOCRACY!!
The biggest problem for me is that the 14th Amendment, Section Three, deals with rebellion and/or insurrection. This was neither. This was a riot and at some point, mature minds have got to kick in here and say, look, he has never even been charged with incitement, let alone rebellion and insurrection. But more importantly, putting aside the fact that he hasn't been convicted, this wasn't a rebellion or insurrection. I know that the other side has really tried hard to portray it that way, but the American people don't even view it that way. Polls indicate that the public views this as a protest that became a riot. It doesn't excuse what happened. [...]
We've had violent protests in this country. There were violent protests when Trump was inaugurated. And at that time, there were Democratic members that voted not to certify Donald Trump. Were they also rebellious? What they're suggesting here is really otherworldly. If this is going to be the new theory, it'll be replicated, it'll metastasize throughout the country. I've got a column out in the New York Post talking about the new effort to bar Congressman [Scott] Perry under the same theory that Democratic members of Congress have asked to bar dozens of Republican members of Congress under the same theories. That's the slippery slope that we're about to step on. [...]
It's a tit-for-tat politics. And the terrible thing is that this is the most successful and stable democracy in the history of the world. And yet, after this long successful run, you have blind advocates today trying to introduce an instability in that system that could destroy it. This is the type of theory that can destroy a democracy. And, you know, there's a poll showing that the majority of people do not believe in this disqualification. Some 40% do, but it shows how dangerous this is. We are a divided country and you have people who are trying to win this election in the courts.
6 Jan 2024 7:15 am
Perhaps!!
Really doesn't matter since the claims are accurate and ground in TRUTH!! The LEFT wants to DESTROY DEMOCRACY and establish themselves as a one party rule nation.
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
6 Jan 2024 7:16 am
Jonathan Turley is an American attorney, legal scholar, writer, commentator, and legal analyst in broadcast and print journalism.[3] A professor at George Washington University Law School,
it had a george in it.
Seriously, Rog....you're a moron.
6 Jan 2024 7:18 am
Beekeeper » 06 Jan 2024, 8:15 am » wrote: ↑ Perhaps!!
Really doesn't matter since the claims are accurate and ground in TRUTH!! The LEFT wants to DESTROY DEMOCRACY and establish themselves as a one party rule nation.
You don't know?Perhaps!!
With 2 exclamation points...
Really doesn't matter
6 Jan 2024 7:21 am
But more importantly, putting aside the fact that he hasn't been convicted, this wasn't a rebellion or insurrection. I know that the other side has really tried hard to portray it that way, but the American people don't even view it that way. Polls indicate that the public views this as a protest that became a riot. It doesn't excuse what happened.Beekeeper » 06 Jan 2024, 8:07 am » wrote: ↑ Georgetown University Law Professor calls LWNJ ****, well, more grasping at straws to DESTROY DEMOCRACY!!
The biggest problem for me is that the 14th Amendment, Section Three, deals with rebellion and/or insurrection. This was neither. This was a riot and at some point, mature minds have got to kick in here and say, look, he has never even been charged with incitement, let alone rebellion and insurrection. But more importantly, putting aside the fact that he hasn't been convicted, this wasn't a rebellion or insurrection. I know that the other side has really tried hard to portray it that way, but the American people don't even view it that way. Polls indicate that the public views this as a protest that became a riot. It doesn't excuse what happened. [...]
We've had violent protests in this country. There were violent protests when Trump was inaugurated. And at that time, there were Democratic members that voted not to certify Donald Trump. Were they also rebellious? What they're suggesting here is really otherworldly. If this is going to be the new theory, it'll be replicated, it'll metastasize throughout the country. I've got a column out in the New York Post talking about the new effort to bar Congressman [Scott] Perry under the same theory that Democratic members of Congress have asked to bar dozens of Republican members of Congress under the same theories. That's the slippery slope that we're about to step on. [...]
It's a tit-for-tat politics. And the terrible thing is that this is the most successful and stable democracy in the history of the world. And yet, after this long successful run, you have blind advocates today trying to introduce an instability in that system that could destroy it. This is the type of theory that can destroy a democracy. And, you know, there's a poll showing that the majority of people do not believe in this disqualification. Some 40% do, but it shows how dangerous this is. We are a divided country and you have people who are trying to win this election in the courts.
Must be the **** law professor alive....Popular sentiment does not define either crimes, or terms.
I need a name for this **** fool....and it ain't Turley..
6 Jan 2024 8:01 am
Beekeeper » 06 Jan 2024, 8:15 am » wrote: ↑ Perhaps!!
Really doesn't matter since the claims are accurate and ground in TRUTH!! The LEFT wants to DESTROY DEMOCRACY and establish themselves as a one party rule nation.
6 Jan 2024 10:23 am
**** bitch...R.Suave » 06 Jan 2024, 8:16 am » wrote: ↑ Jonathan Turley is an American attorney, legal scholar, writer, commentator, and legal analyst in broadcast and print journalism.[3] A professor at George Washington University Law School,
it had a george in it.
Seriously, Rog....you're a moron.
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime”
LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened."
brown's unheeded words of wisdom 
6 Jan 2024 11:00 am
Tough ****.
Most Americans still believe it was wrong
and that Trumpy The Mouth encouraged it.
That aint gonna change.
Most Americans still believe it was wrong
and that Trumpy The Mouth encouraged it.
That aint gonna change.
6 Jan 2024 11:02 am
6 Jan 2024 12:07 pm
Sure he does, **** MORONIC ASSHOLE!!!
It should be easy enough for you to find out what it is, seeing how you THINK you are the smartest LWNJ on the planet!!
So go **** yourself and take your boyfriends load like a good little CUMDUMP and SHUT THE **** UP!!
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
6 Jan 2024 12:09 pm
But you have no idea what it is...Beekeeper » 06 Jan 2024, 1:07 pm » wrote: ↑ Sure he does, **** MORONIC ASSHOLE!!!
It should be easy enough for you to find out what it is, seeing how you THINK you are the smartest LWNJ on the planet!!
So go **** yourself and take your boyfriends load like a good little CUMDUMP and SHUT THE **** UP!!
6 Jan 2024 12:10 pm
Rog,
You're a dullard.
Accept it, move on.
6 Jan 2024 12:18 pm
run cunny...
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime”
LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened."
brown's unheeded words of wisdom 
6 Jan 2024 12:31 pm
R.Suave » 06 Jan 2024, 8:21 am » wrote: ↑ But more importantly, putting aside the fact that he hasn't been convicted, this wasn't a rebellion or insurrection. I know that the other side has really tried hard to portray it that way, but the American people don't even view it that way. Polls indicate that the public views this as a protest that became a riot. It doesn't excuse what happened.
Must be the **** law professor alive....Popular sentiment does not define either crimes, or terms.
I need a name for this **** fool....and it ain't Turley..
Pay attention. I am about to school you.
This is an insurrection:
This is.a ******* mob gone wild:
You're Welcome.
BV sleep survey don't give a ****. viewtopic.php?p=2588518#p2588518
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV Absolves USSS: viewtopic.php?p=2585544#p2585544
The answer viewtopic.php?p=2573481#p2573481
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV Absolves USSS: viewtopic.php?p=2585544#p2585544
The answer viewtopic.php?p=2573481#p2573481
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
6 Jan 2024 1:08 pm
You will no doubt be shocked to discover that the Court's definition did not rely on pictures.Huey » 06 Jan 2024, 1:31 pm » wrote: ↑ Pay attention. I am about to school you.
This is an insurrection:
This is.a ******* mob gone wild:
You're Welcome.
6 Jan 2024 1:13 pm
R.Suave » 06 Jan 2024, 2:08 pm » wrote: ↑ You will no doubt be shocked to discover that the Court's definition did not rely on pictures.
It is not THE COURT. It is the CO court, Karen.
Not sure why you are so scared of a group of unarmed people.
BV sleep survey don't give a ****. viewtopic.php?p=2588518#p2588518
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV Absolves USSS: viewtopic.php?p=2585544#p2585544
The answer viewtopic.php?p=2573481#p2573481
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV Absolves USSS: viewtopic.php?p=2585544#p2585544
The answer viewtopic.php?p=2573481#p2573481
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
6 Jan 2024 1:15 pm
2 Colorado courts, Sheilagh...including the arbiter of Colorado law.Huey » 06 Jan 2024, 2:13 pm » wrote: ↑ It is not THE COURT. It is the CO court, Karen.
Not sure why you are so scared of a group of unarmed people.
I don't know why you persist in defining something of which you've made every effort to remain ignorant...
6 Jan 2024 1:16 pm
R.Suave » 06 Jan 2024, 2:15 pm » wrote: ↑ 2 Colorado courts, Sheilagh...including the arbiter of Colorado law.
I don't know why you persist in defining something of which you've made every effort to remain ignorant...
That's already. The US SUPREME COURT will be hearing this case shortly. A date has been set.
Good luck.
BV sleep survey don't give a ****. viewtopic.php?p=2588518#p2588518
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV Absolves USSS: viewtopic.php?p=2585544#p2585544
The answer viewtopic.php?p=2573481#p2573481
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV Absolves USSS: viewtopic.php?p=2585544#p2585544
The answer viewtopic.php?p=2573481#p2573481
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
Who is online
In total there are 4386 users online :: 12 registered, 16 bots, and 4358 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, Blackvegetable, Buck Naked, Buffalo, ROG62, RebelGator, FJB, Beekeeper, jerra b, SouthernFried, nefarious101, sole
Bots: ADmantX, aiohttp, TTD-Content, Not, MicroMessenger, proximic, DuckDuckBot, CriteoBot, DuckDuckGo, YandexBot, Mediapartners-Google, Googlebot, Applebot, facebookexternalhit, curl/7, bingbot