Fondler,Beekeeper » 07 Jan 2024, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑ Sorry, ****, but it's NOT ME that is letting that MILLION DOLLAR MOUTH of yours overload that **** PLUG NICKEL *** and thinking your can break femurs!!
So get back in your corner and SHUT THE **** UP!!!
That's right. Democrats are the lyingest sons of bitches in the world.Beekeeper » 06 Jan 2024, 8:07 am » wrote: ↑ Georgetown University Law Professor calls LWNJ ****, well, more grasping at straws to DESTROY DEMOCRACY!!
The biggest problem for me is that the 14th Amendment, Section Three, deals with rebellion and/or insurrection. This was neither. This was a riot and at some point, mature minds have got to kick in here and say, look, he has never even been charged with incitement, let alone rebellion and insurrection. But more importantly, putting aside the fact that he hasn't been convicted, this wasn't a rebellion or insurrection. I know that the other side has really tried hard to portray it that way, but the American people don't even view it that way. Polls indicate that the public views this as a protest that became a riot. It doesn't excuse what happened. [...]
We've had violent protests in this country. There were violent protests when Trump was inaugurated. And at that time, there were Democratic members that voted not to certify Donald Trump. Were they also rebellious? What they're suggesting here is really otherworldly. If this is going to be the new theory, it'll be replicated, it'll metastasize throughout the country. I've got a column out in the New York Post talking about the new effort to bar Congressman [Scott] Perry under the same theory that Democratic members of Congress have asked to bar dozens of Republican members of Congress under the same theories. That's the slippery slope that we're about to step on. [...]
It's a tit-for-tat politics. And the terrible thing is that this is the most successful and stable democracy in the history of the world. And yet, after this long successful run, you have blind advocates today trying to introduce an instability in that system that could destroy it. This is the type of theory that can destroy a democracy. And, you know, there's a poll showing that the majority of people do not believe in this disqualification. Some 40% do, but it shows how dangerous this is. We are a divided country and you have people who are trying to win this election in the courts.
So, Fondler...Beekeeper » 06 Jan 2024, 8:07 am » wrote: ↑ Georgetown University Law Professor calls LWNJ ****, well, more grasping at straws to DESTROY DEMOCRACY!!
The biggest problem for me is that the 14th Amendment, Section Three, deals with rebellion and/or insurrection. This was neither. This was a riot and at some point, mature minds have got to kick in here and say, look, he has never even been charged with incitement, let alone rebellion and insurrection. But more importantly, putting aside the fact that he hasn't been convicted, this wasn't a rebellion or insurrection. I know that the other side has really tried hard to portray it that way, but the American people don't even view it that way. Polls indicate that the public views this as a protest that became a riot. It doesn't excuse what happened. [...]
We've had violent protests in this country. There were violent protests when Trump was inaugurated. And at that time, there were Democratic members that voted not to certify Donald Trump. Were they also rebellious? What they're suggesting here is really otherworldly. If this is going to be the new theory, it'll be replicated, it'll metastasize throughout the country. I've got a column out in the New York Post talking about the new effort to bar Congressman [Scott] Perry under the same theory that Democratic members of Congress have asked to bar dozens of Republican members of Congress under the same theories. That's the slippery slope that we're about to step on. [...]
It's a tit-for-tat politics. And the terrible thing is that this is the most successful and stable democracy in the history of the world. And yet, after this long successful run, you have blind advocates today trying to introduce an instability in that system that could destroy it. This is the type of theory that can destroy a democracy. And, you know, there's a poll showing that the majority of people do not believe in this disqualification. Some 40% do, but it shows how dangerous this is. We are a divided country and you have people who are trying to win this election in the courts.
R.Suave » 07 Jan 2024, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑ So, Fondler...
Someone emailed you this crap, but neither of you were curious to learn the name of this solon?
You're a **** idiot, Fondler.
You're stupid enough to believe that's how it works...Beekeeper » 07 Jan 2024, 2:40 pm » wrote: ↑ Oh, I KNOW who this is, but you, on the other hand, PROVED you are a **** IMBECILE TOO **** STUPID TO USE GOOGLE!!!
Now, run along ****, you lost.
What do you need "put up" now?Beekeeper » 07 Jan 2024, 5:47 pm » wrote: ↑ No, I'm smart enough to know that you are too **** CHICKEN to put up or SHUT UP!!
Run along now juniorette, YOU LOST!!! And are more than STUPID!!
Who gives a **** what you believe, Toady....you're a **** idiot.
Every past insurrection had people using guns and people were killed. At the worst this Jan. 6 **** was vandalizing, trespassing and breaking and entering. But thay are too STUPID to understand this.
How evolving actually happens.