You have personal experience with either weapon.R.Suave » 09 Jan 2024, 8:28 pm » wrote: ↑ "Design" and "variant", applied to firearms, are terms of art. With specific definitions.
I don't care if you and @Huey are too stupid to grasp this.
Red states have 44% more violent crime than blue states. Trump states are top ten on most violent states in America.
That your interpretation. In other words, your opinion.R.Suave » 09 Jan 2024, 8:28 pm » wrote: ↑ "Design" and "variant", applied to firearms, are terms of art. With specific definitions.
I don't care if you and @Huey are too stupid to grasp this.
Irrelevant.
He knows how to pose with an empty shotgun, I know that.
No...it isn't..RedheadedStranger » 09 Jan 2024, 8:36 pm » wrote: ↑ That your interpretation. In other words, your opinion.
Opinions are like assholes. Everybody has one.
Yes it is... so keep being wrong.R.Suave » 09 Jan 2024, 8:37 pm » wrote: ↑ No...it isn't..
Which is why you are so completely wrong..
Either educate yourself, or bugger off.
Perhaps if they stopped letting out violent criminals.Huey » 09 Jan 2024, 1:19 pm » wrote: ↑ "There is no excuse for this carnage. We have to ban assault weapons. I did it once before, and I'm going come back again and do it," Biden said during his speech.Biden also said he wants to ban "high-capacity magazines" and require "universal background checks," adding that "it does not violate the Second Amendment. It's common sense, and it saves lives."
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/joe ... 26437.html
I guess no one told Joe, or better yet, those making decisions for him, that none of those proposals would have done a thing to stop the Iowa shooting.
A shotgun, a handgun and a homemade explosive device were in the possession of the 17 year old shooter.
You think like @Huey ......pat yourself on the back...RedheadedStranger » 09 Jan 2024, 8:39 pm » wrote: ↑ Yes it is... so keep being wrong.
I don't care either way if you don't mind looking stupid.
LOL!R.Suave » 09 Jan 2024, 8:45 pm » wrote: ↑ You think like @Huey ......pat yourself on the back...
But stop bugging the adults with that crap.
Just read some of the citations.RedheadedStranger » 09 Jan 2024, 8:47 pm » wrote: ↑ LOL!
You are one to talk about someone patting themselves on the back.
Tell us again how you are the smartest fella here!
Another instance where we should ignore the citation in favor of your assurances...Huey » 09 Jan 2024, 8:32 pm » wrote: ↑ Ok, you have NO personal. Tomorrow I will dumb it down for you since you have never fired either weapon nor performed operator maintenance on them.
You coulda said NONE.
Rule, idiot. **** your demands.
**** Biden. He's a peice of ****. Can't wait until they come for them.Huey » 09 Jan 2024, 1:19 pm » wrote: ↑ "There is no excuse for this carnage. We have to ban assault weapons. I did it once before, and I'm going come back again and do it," Biden said during his speech.Biden also said he wants to ban "high-capacity magazines" and require "universal background checks," adding that "it does not violate the Second Amendment. It's common sense, and it saves lives."
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/joe ... 26437.html
I guess no one told Joe, or better yet, those making decisions for him, that none of those proposals would have done a thing to stop the Iowa shooting.
A shotgun, a handgun and a homemade explosive device were in the possession of the 17 year old shooter.
R.Suave » 09 Jan 2024, 8:28 pm » wrote: ↑ "Design" and "variant", applied to firearms, are terms of art. With specific definitions.
I don't care if you and @Huey are too stupid to grasp this.
Well Iowa is just becoming a red state that leads the nation in violent crime year after year. It's what Republicans support violent crime and death threats is what they do and support. That's why they love Donald J TrumpHuey » 10 Jan 2024, 7:49 am » wrote: ↑ He only applies this argument to firearms. It;s how he rolls.