Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
The Hissy Will Not Be Televised....
The Hissy Will Not Be Televised....
By R. Suave
10 Jan 2024 2:27 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
10 Jan 2024 2:27 pm
“Thus, in my sole discretion, I will consent to let Mr. Trump make a closing argument if, and only if, through counsel by 1/9/2024, and by himself, personally, on the record, just before he speaks, he agrees to limit his subjects to what is permissible in a counsel’s closing argument, that is, commentary on the relevant, material facts that are in evidence, and application of the relevant law to those facts,” Engoron wrote in an email last week.
“He may not seek to introduce new evidence. He may not ‘testify.’ He may not comment on irrelevant matters,” Engoron wrote. “In particular, and without limitation, he may not deliver a campaign speech, and he may not impugn myself, my staff, plaintiff, plaintiff’s staff, or the New York State Court System, none of which is relevant to this case, and all of which, except commenting on my staff, can be done, and is being done, in other forums.”
Trump’s attorney Chris Kise said Trump would not agree to such terms and went back and forth with Engoron minutes before the deadline, email records show.
“He cannot agree (nor would i recommend he do so) to the proposed preconditions and prior restraints,” Kise wrote in an email response.
Engoron pushed back in a subsequent email Tuesday, writing, “Your and your client’s rejection of the reasonable, normal limits I am imposing on any argument by Mr. Trump, which are the same limits that the law imposes on any person making a closing argument, completely justifies the need to impose them.”
https://www.cnn.com/2024/01/10/politics ... index.html
OH, SNAPPAGE!
“He may not seek to introduce new evidence. He may not ‘testify.’ He may not comment on irrelevant matters,” Engoron wrote. “In particular, and without limitation, he may not deliver a campaign speech, and he may not impugn myself, my staff, plaintiff, plaintiff’s staff, or the New York State Court System, none of which is relevant to this case, and all of which, except commenting on my staff, can be done, and is being done, in other forums.”
Trump’s attorney Chris Kise said Trump would not agree to such terms and went back and forth with Engoron minutes before the deadline, email records show.
“He cannot agree (nor would i recommend he do so) to the proposed preconditions and prior restraints,” Kise wrote in an email response.
Engoron pushed back in a subsequent email Tuesday, writing, “Your and your client’s rejection of the reasonable, normal limits I am imposing on any argument by Mr. Trump, which are the same limits that the law imposes on any person making a closing argument, completely justifies the need to impose them.”
https://www.cnn.com/2024/01/10/politics ... index.html
OH, SNAPPAGE!
10 Jan 2024 2:31 pm
10 Jan 2024 2:33 pm
Winner Winner Chicken Dinner.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
10 Jan 2024 3:06 pm
Why doesn't the judge just say he has no first amendment rights and shut his barfing pie hole?R.Suave » 10 Jan 2024, 3:27 pm » wrote: ↑ “Thus, in my sole discretion, I will consent to let Mr. Trump make a closing argument if, and only if, through counsel by 1/9/2024, and by himself, personally, on the record, just before he speaks, he agrees to limit his subjects to what is permissible in a counsel’s closing argument, that is, commentary on the relevant, material facts that are in evidence, and application of the relevant law to those facts,” Engoron wrote in an email last week.
“He may not seek to introduce new evidence. He may not ‘testify.’ He may not comment on irrelevant matters,” Engoron wrote. “In particular, and without limitation, he may not deliver a campaign speech, and he may not impugn myself, my staff, plaintiff, plaintiff’s staff, or the New York State Court System, none of which is relevant to this case, and all of which, except commenting on my staff, can be done, and is being done, in other forums.”
Trump’s attorney Chris Kise said Trump would not agree to such terms and went back and forth with Engoron minutes before the deadline, email records show.
“He cannot agree (nor would i recommend he do so) to the proposed preconditions and prior restraints,” Kise wrote in an email response.
Engoron pushed back in a subsequent email Tuesday, writing, “Your and your client’s rejection of the reasonable, normal limits I am imposing on any argument by Mr. Trump, which are the same limits that the law imposes on any person making a closing argument, completely justifies the need to impose them.”
https://www.cnn.com/2024/01/10/politics ... index.html
OH, SNAPPAGE!
10 Jan 2024 3:08 pm
WOW using reasonable doubt against citizens. If nobody can disprove a negative, then everyone cannot prove what is positive either.R. Suave » 10 Jan 2024, 3:27 pm » wrote: ↑ “Thus, in my sole discretion, I will consent to let Mr. Trump make a closing argument if, and only if, through counsel by 1/9/2024, and by himself, personally, on the record, just before he speaks, he agrees to limit his subjects to what is permissible in a counsel’s closing argument, that is, commentary on the relevant, material facts that are in evidence, and application of the relevant law to those facts,” Engoron wrote in an email last week.
“He may not seek to introduce new evidence. He may not ‘testify.’ He may not comment on irrelevant matters,” Engoron wrote. “In particular, and without limitation, he may not deliver a campaign speech, and he may not impugn myself, my staff, plaintiff, plaintiff’s staff, or the New York State Court System, none of which is relevant to this case, and all of which, except commenting on my staff, can be done, and is being done, in other forums.”
Trump’s attorney Chris Kise said Trump would not agree to such terms and went back and forth with Engoron minutes before the deadline, email records show.
“He cannot agree (nor would i recommend he do so) to the proposed preconditions and prior restraints,” Kise wrote in an email response.
Engoron pushed back in a subsequent email Tuesday, writing, “Your and your client’s rejection of the reasonable, normal limits I am imposing on any argument by Mr. Trump, which are the same limits that the law imposes on any person making a closing argument, completely justifies the need to impose them.”
https://www.cnn.com/2024/01/10/politics ... index.html
OH, SNAPPAGE!
10 Jan 2024 3:10 pm
Do you understand that there are certain procedural rules that apply....even for Mary's little bitchbundle?RebelGator » 10 Jan 2024, 4:06 pm » wrote: ↑ Why doesn't the judge just say he has no first amendment rights and shut his barfing pie hole?
10 Jan 2024 3:11 pm
10 Jan 2024 3:13 pm
10 Jan 2024 3:15 pm
No, There isn't....R.Suave » 10 Jan 2024, 4:10 pm » wrote: ↑ Do you understand that there are certain procedural rules that apply....even for Mary's little bitchbundle?
but let's see you squirm in trying to back up your claim with a link .....
10 Jan 2024 3:17 pm
The rules are whatever that libtard judge says they are....you didn't know that?R.Suave » 10 Jan 2024, 4:10 pm » wrote: ↑ Do you understand that there are certain procedural rules that apply....even for Mary's little bitchbundle?
I'm leaving with a question.......you don't have that ploy copyrighted, do you?
10 Jan 2024 3:22 pm
You ask a intelligent question. I'm supervising.RebelGator » 10 Jan 2024, 4:17 pm » wrote: ↑ The rules are whatever that libtard judge says they are....you didn't know that?
I'm leaving with a question.......you don't have that ploy copyrighted, do you?
10 Jan 2024 3:27 pm
10 Jan 2024 3:30 pm
How do you deal with people who can't read?RebelGator » 10 Jan 2024, 4:17 pm » wrote: ↑ The rules are whatever that libtard judge says they are....you didn't know that?
I'm leaving with a question.......you don't have that ploy copyrighted, do you?
10 Jan 2024 3:31 pm
Read the one I posted.Majik » 10 Jan 2024, 4:15 pm » wrote: ↑ No, There isn't....
but let's see you squirm in trying to back up your claim with a link .....
10 Jan 2024 3:48 pm
If New Yorkers had a 
they'd be rioting over the 10's of millions of their tax dollars being pissed away on this ridiculously embarrassing **** show that will be overturned on appeal 
they'd be rioting over the 10's of millions of their tax dollars being pissed away on this ridiculously embarrassing **** show that will be overturned on appeal 
10 Jan 2024 3:53 pm
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom 
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
10 Jan 2024 3:54 pm
abide...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
11 Jan 2024 7:10 am
Trump folded. He is not going to make his little speech. What a coward.R.Suave » 10 Jan 2024, 3:27 pm » wrote: ↑ “Thus, in my sole discretion, I will consent to let Mr. Trump make a closing argument if, and only if, through counsel by 1/9/2024, and by himself, personally, on the record, just before he speaks, he agrees to limit his subjects to what is permissible in a counsel’s closing argument, that is, commentary on the relevant, material facts that are in evidence, and application of the relevant law to those facts,” Engoron wrote in an email last week.
“He may not seek to introduce new evidence. He may not ‘testify.’ He may not comment on irrelevant matters,” Engoron wrote. “In particular, and without limitation, he may not deliver a campaign speech, and he may not impugn myself, my staff, plaintiff, plaintiff’s staff, or the New York State Court System, none of which is relevant to this case, and all of which, except commenting on my staff, can be done, and is being done, in other forums.”
Trump’s attorney Chris Kise said Trump would not agree to such terms and went back and forth with Engoron minutes before the deadline, email records show.
“He cannot agree (nor would i recommend he do so) to the proposed preconditions and prior restraints,” Kise wrote in an email response.
Engoron pushed back in a subsequent email Tuesday, writing, “Your and your client’s rejection of the reasonable, normal limits I am imposing on any argument by Mr. Trump, which are the same limits that the law imposes on any person making a closing argument, completely justifies the need to impose them.”
https://www.cnn.com/2024/01/10/politics ... index.html
OH, SNAPPAGE!
11 Jan 2024 7:12 am
Rules don't apply to Grifty..Bidencrimefamily » 11 Jan 2024, 8:10 am » wrote: ↑ Trump folded. He is not going to make his little speech. What a coward.
@Vegas can tell you what that means.
11 Jan 2024 7:16 am
Vegas doesn't know much of anything I've found.R.Suave » 11 Jan 2024, 8:12 am » wrote: ↑ Rules don't apply to Grifty..
@Vegas can tell you what that means.
Who is online
In total there are 2421 users online :: 6 registered, 13 bots, and 2402 guests
Bots: ADmantX, MQQBrowser, proximic, CriteoBot, DSearch, DuckDuckBot, Mediapartners-Google, Googlebot, YandexBot, bingbot, curl/7, facebookexternalhit, Applebot