I laugh at those concerning the stolen valor.Skans » 11 Jan 2024, 11:29 am » wrote: ↑ I've got two things to say about Stolen Valor. The first is that if I were in the military and I found anyone intentionally impersonating a service member to get sympathy or freebees, it would piss me off - I get it.
The second thing I have to say is that I HATE X-military assholes who take this to the extreme. When I was about 17 years old, I happened to be wearing my dad's military fatigues - it was an OG long sleeve shirt, or light jacket as I recall, and I think I was wearing jeans. It did still have some insignia on it - really wasn't paying attention, just liked my dad's old military shirt.
So, some military guy comes up to me and demands that I take off the shirt - I thought he was just funnin around. He asked where I got the shirt, and I said it was my dad's. His buddy said "let it go" to him, but the guy didn't want to let it go. I had no idea that the guy even had a beef with me. He kept demanding that I take it off. I finally told the guy (he was a pretty young, skinny guy) that he'd have to make me take it off.
Finally, his buddy (who was not a dick) explained a couple of things to me. That, as a civilian, I shouldn't be wearing any fatigues with insignia on it, that its disrespectful to military members, and that at the very least, I need to remove the rank insignia if I want to wear it. I thanked him, said I would, but that I'm not taking it off - he understood. The other guy still had his nose bent over this, but backed off.
I don't believe that Stolen Valor was a real thing in my dad's time - he didn't think to remove the insignia or warn me not to wear it anywhere. Well, that's my rant about stolen valor - - feel free to leave encouraging, kind, complimentary comments for me.
The law amends the federal criminal code to make it a crime for a person to fraudulently claim having received a valor award specified in the Act, with the intention of obtaining money, property, or other tangible benefit by convincing another that he or she received the award.
I used to work with a guy that used to always tell war stories about his tour in Vietnam, and I never gave it much thought until I overheard a conversation one day and found out he was only three years older than me.Warcok » 11 Jan 2024, 11:55 am » wrote: ↑ A lot of those assholes don't know what stolen valor is. Putting on some BDU's and saying you served in 'Nam isn't stolen valor
Yeah that guy needs his *** beat but the supreme Court ruled that it's considered free speech to play pretend soldier.RedheadedStranger » 11 Jan 2024, 12:37 pm » wrote: ↑ I used to work with a guy that used to always tell war stories about his tour in Vietnam, and I never gave it much thought until I overheard a conversation one day and found out he was only three years older than me.
I was 9 in 1975... so for this guy to have served in Vietnam, even as late as 1975, he would have only been 12 at the oldest. In short, his Vietnam war stories were all ****. He was way too young to have been there.
His motorcycle vest and gear had several "Vietnam Veteran" patches and insignia and **** on them so he was straight up trying to convince everyone that he had served in SE Asia during the war too.
He worked in a different department from me so I didn't really have much to do with him in the first place, but i really didn't after I found out how full of **** he was.
Good point. Didn't even know there was a law on this.Warcok » 11 Jan 2024, 11:55 am » wrote: ↑ A lot of those assholes don't know what stolen valor is. Putting on some BDU's and saying you served in 'Nam isn't stolen valor
"The law amends the federal criminal code to make it a crime for a person to fraudulently claim having received a valor award specified in the Act, with the intention of obtaining money, property, or other tangible benefit by convincing another that he or she received the award."
I never understood why folks lie like that?RedheadedStranger » 11 Jan 2024, 12:37 pm » wrote: ↑ I used to work with a guy that used to always tell war stories about his tour in Vietnam, and I never gave it much thought until I overheard a conversation one day and found out he was only three years older than me.
I was 9 in 1975... so for this guy to have served in Vietnam, even as late as 1975, he would have only been 12 at the oldest. In short, his Vietnam war stories were all ****. He was way too young to have been there.
His motorcycle vest and gear had several "Vietnam Veteran" patches and insignia and **** on them so he was straight up trying to convince everyone that he had served in SE Asia during the war too.
He worked in a different department from me so I didn't really have much to do with him in the first place, but i really didn't after I found out how full of **** he was.
High heels galoreSumela » 11 Jan 2024, 11:51 am » wrote: ↑ US Military garb in 2024
is quite open for interpretation
by ***, trannies, and gender-retards.![]()
Homer » 11 Jan 2024, 3:06 pm » wrote: ↑ High heels galore
Girls are boys & boys are girls
Stolen Valerie
Might have been @Cannonpointer , he served in the baby seals.RedheadedStranger » 11 Jan 2024, 12:37 pm » wrote: ↑ I used to work with a guy that used to always tell war stories about his tour in Vietnam, and I never gave it much thought until I overheard a conversation one day and found out he was only three years older than me.
I was 9 in 1975... so for this guy to have served in Vietnam, even as late as 1975, he would have only been 12 at the oldest. In short, his Vietnam war stories were all ****. He was way too young to have been there.
His motorcycle vest and gear had several "Vietnam Veteran" patches and insignia and **** on them so he was straight up trying to convince everyone that he had served in SE Asia during the war too.
He worked in a different department from me so I didn't really have much to do with him in the first place, but i really didn't after I found out how full of **** he was.
Nice call back!Cedar » 11 Jan 2024, 3:56 pm » wrote: ↑ Might have been @Cannonpointer , he served in the baby seals.
I served as a second lieutenant when I was only three years old. That guy might have been telling the truth - although, if he was, he served in a top secret unit and was violating his oath of secrecy.RedheadedStranger » 11 Jan 2024, 12:37 pm » wrote: ↑ I used to work with a guy that used to always tell war stories about his tour in Vietnam, and I never gave it much thought until I overheard a conversation one day and found out he was only three years older than me.
I was 9 in 1975... so for this guy to have served in Vietnam, even as late as 1975, he would have only been 12 at the oldest. In short, his Vietnam war stories were all ****. He was way too young to have been there.
His motorcycle vest and gear had several "Vietnam Veteran" patches and insignia and **** on them so he was straight up trying to convince everyone that he had served in SE Asia during the war too.
He worked in a different department from me so I didn't really have much to do with him in the first place, but i really didn't after I found out how full of **** he was.
Is this you?Cannonpointer » 11 Jan 2024, 4:11 pm » wrote: ↑ I served as a second lieutenant when I was only three years old. That guy might have been telling the truth - although, if he was, he served in a top secret unit and was violating his oath of secrecy.
I NEVER talked about the Baby SEALS until it was declassified.

Yes but I was not 3 in that photo I was 33.
Cannonpointer » 11 Jan 2024, 4:11 pm » wrote: ↑ I served as a second lieutenant when I was only three years old. That guy might have been telling the truth - although, if he was, he served in a top secret unit and was violating his oath of secrecy.
I NEVER talked about the Baby SEALS until it was declassified.