**** him, find him in contempt to highlight Garlands asshattery.Huey » 12 Jan 2024, 11:45 am » wrote: ↑ Hunter Biden says he'll speak to House committee on dad's impeachment inquiry — under this condition
WASHINGTON — Hunter Biden caved Friday and agreed to sit for a deposition in the House impeachment inquiry into his father — moving to avoid a vote as soon as next week to hold him in contempt of Congress.Hunter, 53, waved a white flag in a letter to Congress from his attorney Abbe Lowell.“If you issue a new proper subpoena, now that there is a duly authorized impeachment inquiry, Mr. Biden will comply for a hearing or deposition. We will accept such a subpoena on Mr. Biden’s behalf,” Lowell wrote.
His little plan backfired the other day when he crashed the hearing.
Hunter needs to be charged with contempt just like Bannon was.Huey » 12 Jan 2024, 11:45 am » wrote: ↑ Hunter Biden says he'll speak to House committee on dad's impeachment inquiry — under this condition
WASHINGTON — Hunter Biden caved Friday and agreed to sit for a deposition in the House impeachment inquiry into his father — moving to avoid a vote as soon as next week to hold him in contempt of Congress.Hunter, 53, waved a white flag in a letter to Congress from his attorney Abbe Lowell.“If you issue a new proper subpoena, now that there is a duly authorized impeachment inquiry, Mr. Biden will comply for a hearing or deposition. We will accept such a subpoena on Mr. Biden’s behalf,” Lowell wrote.
RedheadedStranger » 12 Jan 2024, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑ Hunter needs to be charges with contempt just like Bannon was.
The precedent has been set.
How about Meadows, or Scott Perry?RedheadedStranger » 12 Jan 2024, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑ Hunter needs to be charged with contempt just like Bannon was.
The precedent has been set.
This thread is about the doper Hunter Biden.
Be tough with a two tiered justice system....the Judiciary is infected with stage four libtard cancer.RedheadedStranger » 12 Jan 2024, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑ Hunter needs to be charged with contempt just like Bannon was.
The precedent has been set.
The context was "precedent", snapperhead.ConsRule » 12 Jan 2024, 3:19 pm » wrote: ↑ This thread is about the doper Hunter Biden.
Typical of you to start trying to hijack it with a diversion.
But he didn't appear...
Your answer to my question is two questions.Huey » 12 Jan 2024, 4:00 pm » wrote: ↑ Did the house ever charge him with it? A simple yes or no will do?
R.Suave » 12 Jan 2024, 4:02 pm » wrote: ↑ Your answer to my question is two questions.
Just to be clear, did either answer my question?
R.Suave » 12 Jan 2024, 4:02 pm » wrote: ↑ Your answer to my question is two questions.
Just to be clear, did either answer my question?
Is this yet another answer?Huey » 12 Jan 2024, 4:22 pm » wrote: ↑ Just to be clear, Askholio, my answer about Jim Jordan is the same the last two times you asked me. Put on your thinking cap...no, not the pointy one they make you wear when you are told to sit in the corner...the other one.