Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Plugs says US does not support independent Taiwan
Plugs says US does not support independent Taiwan
By Buck Naked
13 Jan 2024 3:58 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
11 posts • Page 1 of 1
13 Jan 2024 3:58 pm
https://www.foxnews.com/world/biden-str ... ection-win
i thought we didnt want Chyna to take it over?
i thought we didnt want Chyna to take it over?
13 Jan 2024 4:40 pm
Well
The One China policy has been WASH DC policy for decades.
Its China's Monroe Doctrine. Only seems right.
The One China policy has been WASH DC policy for decades.
Its China's Monroe Doctrine. Only seems right.
13 Jan 2024 6:29 pm
13 Jan 2024 6:30 pm
So confusing
The term One China may refer, in alphabetical order, to one of the following:
The One China policy refers to a United States policy of strategic ambiguity regarding Taiwan.[1] In a 1972 joint communiqué with the PRC, the United States "acknowledges that all Chinese on either side of the Taiwan Strait maintain there is but one China and that Taiwan is a part of China" and "does not challenge that position."[2] It reaffirms the U.S. interest in a peaceful settlement of the Taiwan question.[3] The United States has formal relations with the PRC, recognizes the PRC as the sole legal government of China, and simultaneously maintains its unofficial relations with Taiwan while taking no official position on Taiwanese sovereignty.[4][5][6] The US “acknowledges” but does not “endorse” PRC's position over Taiwan,[7][8] implying it neither supports nor rejects China's sovereignty over Taiwan, and has considered Taiwan's political status as “undetermined”.[9]
Internationally, it may also refer to the stance of numerous other countries. For instance, Australia's 1972 Joint Communiqué with the PRC recognised the Government of the PRC as China's sole legal government, and acknowledged the position of the PRC that Taiwan was a province of the PRC",[10] but "neither supports nor opposes the PRC position" on the matter.[11] While some countries, such as the UK, Canada, Australia, and Japan like the U.S. acknowledge but do not recognise the PRC's claim, the communiqués of some others, including Israel, Panama, and the Gambia, concurs with the PRC's interpretation.[12]
The One China principle is the position held by the People's Republic of China (PRC) and the ruling Chinese Communist Party (CCP) that there is only one sovereign state under the name China, with the PRC serving as the sole legitimate government of that China, and Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.[13][14] It is opposed to the idea that there are two states holding the name "China", the People's Republic of China (PRC) and the Republic of China (ROC); as well as the idea that China and Taiwan form two separate countries.[15]
One China with respective interpretations refers to the interpretation of the 1992 Consensus asserted by the ROC's then-governing political party Kuomintang (KMT) that both the PRC and ROC had agreed that there is one "China", but disagreed on whether "China" is represented by the PRC or ROC.[16][17] This interpretation of the 1992 Consensus has not been accepted by the PRC.[18][19] The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), the other major party of the ROC politics, has never acknowledged the existence of the so-called "1992 consensus" and also rejected any claim that both sides of the Taiwan Strait as "one China".[20] Lee Teng-hui, the President of the ROC from the KMT at the time, said no consensus had been reached in 1992 and claims to the contrary were "nonsense", and that the term was "something that former Mainland Affairs Council minister Su Chi (蘇起) fabricated to placate the KMT in 2000s", which Su conceded in 2006.[21]
Prior to the 1991 constitutional amendments and democratization of Taiwan, the KMT-dominated Republic of China (ROC) government considered the ROC itself as the sole legitimate government of "China", which contested sovereignty over its constitutionally-defined territories, including the former late Qing dynasty borders of Mainland China, Tibet, Outer Mongolia, Tannu Uriankhai, and Badakhshan etc.,[22][23] and also legally designated the Chinese Communist Party as a "rebellious group".[24]
The term One China may refer, in alphabetical order, to one of the following:
The One China policy refers to a United States policy of strategic ambiguity regarding Taiwan.[1] In a 1972 joint communiqué with the PRC, the United States "acknowledges that all Chinese on either side of the Taiwan Strait maintain there is but one China and that Taiwan is a part of China" and "does not challenge that position."[2] It reaffirms the U.S. interest in a peaceful settlement of the Taiwan question.[3] The United States has formal relations with the PRC, recognizes the PRC as the sole legal government of China, and simultaneously maintains its unofficial relations with Taiwan while taking no official position on Taiwanese sovereignty.[4][5][6] The US “acknowledges” but does not “endorse” PRC's position over Taiwan,[7][8] implying it neither supports nor rejects China's sovereignty over Taiwan, and has considered Taiwan's political status as “undetermined”.[9]
Internationally, it may also refer to the stance of numerous other countries. For instance, Australia's 1972 Joint Communiqué with the PRC recognised the Government of the PRC as China's sole legal government, and acknowledged the position of the PRC that Taiwan was a province of the PRC",[10] but "neither supports nor opposes the PRC position" on the matter.[11] While some countries, such as the UK, Canada, Australia, and Japan like the U.S. acknowledge but do not recognise the PRC's claim, the communiqués of some others, including Israel, Panama, and the Gambia, concurs with the PRC's interpretation.[12]
The One China principle is the position held by the People's Republic of China (PRC) and the ruling Chinese Communist Party (CCP) that there is only one sovereign state under the name China, with the PRC serving as the sole legitimate government of that China, and Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.[13][14] It is opposed to the idea that there are two states holding the name "China", the People's Republic of China (PRC) and the Republic of China (ROC); as well as the idea that China and Taiwan form two separate countries.[15]
One China with respective interpretations refers to the interpretation of the 1992 Consensus asserted by the ROC's then-governing political party Kuomintang (KMT) that both the PRC and ROC had agreed that there is one "China", but disagreed on whether "China" is represented by the PRC or ROC.[16][17] This interpretation of the 1992 Consensus has not been accepted by the PRC.[18][19] The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), the other major party of the ROC politics, has never acknowledged the existence of the so-called "1992 consensus" and also rejected any claim that both sides of the Taiwan Strait as "one China".[20] Lee Teng-hui, the President of the ROC from the KMT at the time, said no consensus had been reached in 1992 and claims to the contrary were "nonsense", and that the term was "something that former Mainland Affairs Council minister Su Chi (蘇起) fabricated to placate the KMT in 2000s", which Su conceded in 2006.[21]
Prior to the 1991 constitutional amendments and democratization of Taiwan, the KMT-dominated Republic of China (ROC) government considered the ROC itself as the sole legitimate government of "China", which contested sovereignty over its constitutionally-defined territories, including the former late Qing dynasty borders of Mainland China, Tibet, Outer Mongolia, Tannu Uriankhai, and Badakhshan etc.,[22][23] and also legally designated the Chinese Communist Party as a "rebellious group".[24]
13 Jan 2024 7:22 pm
Focus on OUR border, child - let China focus on theirs.BuckNaked » 13 Jan 2024, 4:58 pm » wrote: ↑ https://www.foxnews.com/world/biden-str ... ection-win
i thought we didnt want Chyna to take it over?
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
13 Jan 2024 7:32 pm
Yes.
Always.
According to BOTH China AND Taiwan.
The only argument has been who should be in charge. But that they are ONE COUNTRY has never been in dispute by anyone, including every nation on earth.
For a number of years, some nations recognized taiwan as the "legitimate" ROC. But for the past 50 years, the mainland PROC has been viewed as the legitimate government.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
13 Jan 2024 7:54 pm
When we leave Cuba alone?.....right?
13 Jan 2024 7:54 pm
DAMN...I do love UksepshuNAL kids....their posts warm my cock-lesCannonpointer » 13 Jan 2024, 8:32 pm » wrote: ↑ Yes.
Always.
According to BOTH China AND Taiwan.
The only argument has been who should be in charge. But that they are ONE COUNTRY has never been in dispute by anyone, including every nation on earth.
For a number of years, some nations recognized taiwan as the "legitimate" ROC. But for the past 50 years, the mainland PROC has been viewed as the legitimate government.
14 Jan 2024 6:36 pm
Cannonpointer » 13 Jan 2024, 8:22 pm » wrote: ↑ Focus on OUR border, child - let China focus on theirs.
it’s hopeless that’s what they want
14 Jan 2024 6:44 pm
Joe Biden giving Putin the Green Light in Ukraine:
"I think what you're going to see is that Russia will be held accountable if it invades. And it depends on what it does. It's one thing if it's a minor incursion and then we end up having a fight about what to do and not do."
Why would he say anything differently to Xi who's already bought and paid for Biden's cooperation?
"I think what you're going to see is that Russia will be held accountable if it invades. And it depends on what it does. It's one thing if it's a minor incursion and then we end up having a fight about what to do and not do."
Why would he say anything differently to Xi who's already bought and paid for Biden's cooperation?
15 Jan 2024 8:31 am
plugs saying very confusing stuff
11 posts • Page 1 of 1
Who is online
In total there are 2307 users online :: 3 registered, 14 bots, and 2290 guests
Bots: proximic, DSearch, DuckDuckBot, MicroMessenger, Mediatoolkitbot, CriteoBot, Baiduspider, Mediapartners-Google, bingbot, facebookexternalhit, Googlebot, YandexBot, curl/7, Applebot