Liberal Forum

Racheal Maddow makes excuses for censorship
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M85vGG0Yo-A


 
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6344986002112
 
 
 

Sad.

Huey » 17 Jan 2024, 7:51 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 7:51 am

Sad.

That the GOP frontrunner is a chronic liar?

R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 8:09 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 8:09 am

That the GOP frontrunner is a chronic liar?

Fox always shows braindead.
The more they show him- the dumber and out of it -he looks.
speak more biden!!!  
 

sootedupCyndi » 17 Jan 2024, 8:14 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 8:14 am

Fox always shows braindead.
The more they show him- the dumber and out of it -he looks.
speak more biden!!!

FOX has to put Grifty on a 7 second delay....

He cost them a **** TON of money...

Good heavens is Grifty good at losing money....

R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 8:09 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 8:09 am

That the GOP frontrunner is a chronic liar?

No, that news companies don't report the news.  OF course that is their choice but not a good business model.  

R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 8:22 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 8:22 am

FOX has to put Grifty on a 7 second delay....

He cost them a **** TON of money...

Good heavens is Grifty good at losing money....

How much will Biden give Ukraine today, you **** moron?

sootedupCyndi » 17 Jan 2024, 1:04 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 1:04 am

Racheal Maddow makes excuses for censorship

 
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6344986002112

I watched the clip.  She very sheepishly and rather ashamed made remarks supporting censorship of Trump.  Not a good segment for her at all.  That will definitely come back to biter her.  

BTW, thanks for posting a succinct statement about what the video clip was about.  I wouldn't have watched the link otherwise.
 

Skans » 17 Jan 2024, 8:45 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 8:45 am

I watched the clip.  She very sheepishly and rather ashamed made remarks supporting censorship of Trump.  Not a good segment for her at all.  That will definitely come back to biter her.  

BTW, thanks for posting a succinct statement about what the video clip was about.  I wouldn't have watched the link otherwise.

I know. I pass by links too. Its all over the news. 
edited it- just showed up on you tube. 
 

R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 8:22 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 8:22 am

FOX has to put Grifty on a 7 second delay....

He cost them a **** TON of money...

Good heavens is Grifty good at losing money....

NO they don't.  That only applies to TV stations broadcasting over the public airways.  Now what the pundits themselves say is can get them in civil issues. 

Huey » 17 Jan 2024, 8:58 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 8:58 am

NO they don't.  That only applies to TV stations broadcasting over the public airways.  Now what the pundits themselves say is can get them in civil issues.

NO they don't.  That only applies to TV stations broadcasting over the public airways

 

Huey » 17 Jan 2024, 8:58 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 8:58 am

NO they don't.  That only applies to TV stations broadcasting over the public airways.  Now what the pundits themselves say is can get them in civil issues.

CNN — Former President Donald Trump tried to call into Fox News after his supporters attacked the US Capitol on January 6, 2021, but the network refused to put him on air, according to court filings from Dominion Voting Systems in its defamation case against the company.

R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 9:04 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 9:04 am

 

But cable is a different medium. The words and images that come via cable are not through public, broadcast airwaves, or what someone can get on a TV with an antenna.
 The FCC's regulation only applies to licensed, local broadcast outlets that transmit through the airwaves. This is largely because of the way these regulations came to be. Because the first broadcast medium was radio and it was available to anyone at any time, public access signals are regulated.
 "Unfortunately, the FCC does not have jurisdiction over cable networks," former FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler said. "In fact, it doesn't even have jurisdiction over networks like CBS and NBC who use the airwaves."
 The FCC regulates the local stations that carry your local news programs, which are affiliates of CBS, NBC, ABC and Fox. But there's essentially no regulation of what's said on cable networks like MSNBC, CNN or, you guessed it, Fox News.

https://www.npr.org/2023/03/16/11635055 ... Fox%20News.

R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 9:07 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 9:07 am

CNN — Former President Donald Trump tried to call into Fox News after his supporters attacked the US Capitol on January 6, 2021, but the network refused to put him on air, according to court filings from Dominion Voting Systems in its defamation case against the company.

 

Which has nothing to do with a 7 second delay.  

Now, but to the subject...go ruin one of your threads.  

Huey » 17 Jan 2024, 9:09 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 9:09 am

But cable is a different medium. The words and images that come via cable are not through public, broadcast airwaves, or what someone can get on a TV with an antenna.
 The FCC's regulation only applies to licensed, local broadcast outlets that transmit through the airwaves. This is largely because of the way these regulations came to be. Because the first broadcast medium was radio and it was available to anyone at any time, public access signals are regulated.
 "Unfortunately, the FCC does not have jurisdiction over cable networks," former FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler said. "In fact, it doesn't even have jurisdiction over networks like CBS and NBC who use the airwaves."
 The FCC regulates the local stations that carry your local news programs, which are affiliates of CBS, NBC, ABC and Fox. But there's essentially no regulation of what's said on cable networks like MSNBC, CNN or, you guessed it, Fox News.

https://www.npr.org/2023/03/16/11635055 ... Fox%20News.

We aren't talking about "regulation", we are talking about legal consequences.

787 million of them....and counting.
 

Huey » 17 Jan 2024, 9:11 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 9:11 am

Which has nothing to do with a 7 second delay.  

Now, but to the subject...go ruin one of your threads.

What does the OP assert?

sootedupCyndi » 17 Jan 2024, 1:04 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 1:04 am

Racheal Maddow makes excuses for censorship
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M85vGG0Yo-A


 
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6344986002112

times have changed 

back in 2015 MSNBC covered tRump almost wall to wall

they even showed an empty podium waiting on tRump to show up to his rally 

and they never showed bernies rallies

they even fired Ed Schultz for wanting to cover berni more

but that was when hillary was pushing for tRump to be the nominee 

she did a back door campaign for tRump because she thought that he would be easier to beat 

  seems they are not gonna make that mistake again
 

A bit more of the same but watch the last 20 seconds, it's a good summary..

 

https://youtu.be/Ihr7UETUDDc

Mrkelly » 17 Jan 2024, 9:16 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 9:16 am

times have changed 

back in 2015 MSNBC covered tRump almost wall to wall


 

And, now they are deathly afraid that Trump is going to steamroll Biden, and along with it, hand the Senate and House over to Republicans.  Maddow's little prune-****** is all twisted up over this.
 

Skans » 17 Jan 2024, 10:52 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2024, 10:52 am

And, now they are deathly afraid that Trump is going to steamroll Biden, and along with it, hand the Senate and House over to Republicans.  Maddow's little prune-****** is all twisted up over this.
 

 

They may show less coverage of his events but they are still talking about him.