Why were there more nuclear black families before the Civil Rights Act, then dived after?

User avatar
By Vegas
23 Jan 2024 10:24 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
1 2 3 4
User avatar
Vegas
23 Jan 2024 9:54 am
User avatar
Beevee's Owner/Giant Slayer
Beevee's Owner/Giant Slayer
20,945 posts
Even black men were getting more jobs, the employment among blacks was climbing before 1964, then it stalled. Since then black women went on welfare, due to fragmented families. It's odd. You would think the opposite would be true , since legal discrimination against blacks was illegal, along with a climbing employment rate among black men. 
Conditions for testing that proposition looked good. Between the 1954 Brown decision and the Civil Rights Act of 1964, legal racism had been dismantled. And the economy was humming along; in the first five years of the sixties, the economy generated 7 million jobs.Yet those most familiar with what was called “the Negro problem” were getting nervous. About half of all blacks had moved into the middle class by the mid-sixties, but now progress seemed to be stalling. The rise in black income relative to that of whites, steady throughout the fifties, was sputtering to a halt. More blacks were out of work in 1964 than in 1954. Most alarming, after rioting in Harlem and Paterson, New Jersey, in 1964, the problems of the northern ghettos suddenly seemed more intractable than those of the George Wallace South.Moynihan, then assistant secretary of labor and one of a new class of government social scientists, was among the worriers, as he puzzled over his charts. One in particular caught his eye. Instead of rates of black male unemployment and welfare enrollment running parallel as they always had, in 1962 they started to diverge in a way that would come to be called “Moynihan’s scissors.” In the past, policymakers had assumed that if the male heads of household had jobs, women and children would be provided for. This no longer seemed true. Even while more black men—though still “catastrophically” low numbers—were getting jobs, more black women were joining the welfare rolls. Moynihan and his aides decided that a serious analysis was in order.
https://www.city-journal.org/article/th ... rs-of-lies
 
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...



Image
User avatar
*GHETTO BLASTER
23 Jan 2024 10:04 am
User avatar
      
17,379 posts
Blacks in general do better when ruled with an Iron Fist.
I submit to you as proof of that statement being true...THE US MILITARY..... :)  
 
User avatar
Skans
23 Jan 2024 10:15 am
User avatar
      
15,413 posts
GHETTOBLASTER » 23 Jan 2024, 11:04 am » wrote: Blacks in general do better when ruled with an Iron Fist.
I submit to you as proof of that statement being true...THE US MILITARY..... Image
 Image
HAPPIER TIMES FOR
BLACK PEOPLE
User avatar
*GHETTO BLASTER
23 Jan 2024 10:21 am
User avatar
      
17,379 posts
Skans » 23 Jan 2024, 11:15 am » wrote: HAPPIER TIMES FOR
BLACK PEOPLE
GOOD TIMES...!!! I HAZ A WOWDAMELM...!!!

Image
 
 
User avatar
Skans
23 Jan 2024 10:22 am
User avatar
      
15,413 posts
GHETTOBLASTER » 23 Jan 2024, 11:21 am » wrote: GOOD TIMES...!!! I HAZ A WOWDAMELM...!!!

Image
Happier times, indeed.  It is Liberals who should be paying reparations to Blacks for the misery they have created for them over the past 70 years.
 
User avatar
*GHETTO BLASTER
23 Jan 2024 10:25 am
User avatar
      
17,379 posts
Skans » 23 Jan 2024, 11:22 am » wrote: Happier times, indeed.  It is Liberals who should be paying reparations to Blacks for the misery they have created for them over the past 70 years.
Everything we've witnessed during that time frame  was planned well before Rothschild Agents founded, funded and ran the NAACP at the turn of the 20th Century.
 
User avatar
Majik
23 Jan 2024 10:40 am
User avatar
      
6,222 posts
Vegas » 23 Jan 2024, 10:54 am » wrote: Even black men were getting more jobs, the employment among blacks was climbing before 1964, then it stalled. Since then black women went on welfare, due to fragmented families. It's odd. You would think the opposite would be true , since legal discrimination against blacks was illegal, along with a climbing employment rate among black men. 

https://www.city-journal.org/article/th ... rs-of-lies
The emergence of the illicit drug industry ......
when selling pot, heroin, coke and crack etc.....became easier to make money than being gainfully employed .

 
User avatar
some leftist homo
23 Jan 2024 11:42 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
1,348 posts
Majik » 23 Jan 2024, 11:40 am » wrote: The emergence of the illicit drug industry ......
when selling pot, heroin, coke and crack etc.....became easier to make money than being gainfully employed .

This is more of a commentary on human nature than politics. You see the same thing in the poorer (and yet very white) areas in the mid-size cities of the West. Reno, SLC, Boise, Spokane... go to the more rundown parts of town and the drug use goes up. Along with drug use is the selling, distributing, and manufacturing. Why? Bigger paydays and less effort. Dangerous and usually you do get caught in the end but in the short term.. the money is good. 
User avatar
Majik
23 Jan 2024 12:02 pm
User avatar
      
6,222 posts
impartialobserver » 23 Jan 2024, 12:42 pm » wrote: This is more of a commentary on human nature than politics. You see the same thing in the poorer (and yet very white) areas in the mid-size cities of the West. Reno, SLC, Boise, Spokane... go to the more rundown parts of town and the drug use goes up. Along with drug use is the selling, distributing, and manufacturing. Why? Bigger paydays and less effort. Dangerous and usually you do get caught in the end but in the short term.. the money is good.
In some respects it is .....
but there is no doubt that The Black community since the early seventies fostered what is now called the "Thug" lifestyle which destroyed nuclear black families because of the illicit drug trade and promises of easy money.....
White nuclear families  didn't catch up to the devastation of the illicit drug trade until the appearance of Meth which devastated both Urban and Rural White America in the 90's....


 
User avatar
some leftist homo
23 Jan 2024 12:08 pm
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
1,348 posts
Majik » 23 Jan 2024, 1:02 pm » wrote: In some respects it is .....
but there is no doubt that The Black community since the early seventies fostered what is now called the "Thug" lifestyle which destroyed nuclear black families because of the illicit drug trade and promises of easy money.....
White nuclear families  didn't catch up to the devastation of the illicit drug trade until the appearance of Meth which devastated both Urban and Rural White America in the 90's....

It takes time for something to filter across society. The illicit drug trade did not start in Salmon, Idaho. Nope.. it started in LA, NY, Miami and then took time to spread across the country. Meth coming about in the 90's was simple coincidence. It took time for folks to concoct a ready made formula for making it. I saw it firsthand. in the beginning, it would come to my hometown of Boise from LA, LV, or PHX. With that comes a lag in distribution and inevitably somebody getting caught along the way. Well.. early 90's and folks started to figure how to make their own. Late 90's, they figured out how to make it in a greenhouse with light bulbs. Usually they added lithium to this. From there, it spread to the rural places being as the old method of making meth was very smelly and noticeable. 
User avatar
Beekeeper
23 Jan 2024 12:18 pm
User avatar
      
10,460 posts
Vegas » 23 Jan 2024, 10:54 am » wrote: Even black men were getting more jobs, the employment among blacks was climbing before 1964, then it stalled. Since then black women went on welfare, due to fragmented families. It's odd. You would think the opposite would be true , since legal discrimination against blacks was illegal, along with a climbing employment rate among black men. 

https://www.city-journal.org/article/th ... rs-of-lies
The destruction of the nuclear black family has its foundations in LBJs "Great Society" WELFARE **** that he used and defined in his statement "I'll have every *** voting Democrat for the next 200 years". He made sure that any REPUBLICAN who attempted to end it would never be elected- or so he thought. Government became "Daddy" to many black babies, an entire network of government workers started "educating" the black race on how to get the government goodies from housing to food stamps. And as  long as these girls never married, they got them for life.

What's so sad about this entire destruction of the black race BY DEMOCRATS is that they brag about it and then double down on how they are supposedly "helping blacks" out of their misery as they push more into the misery dump THEY created and want more of.
 
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke

The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
User avatar
Skans
23 Jan 2024 12:50 pm
User avatar
      
15,413 posts
Vegas » 23 Jan 2024, 10:54 am » wrote: Even black men were getting more jobs, the employment among blacks was climbing before 1964, then it stalled. Since then black women went on welfare, due to fragmented families. It's odd. You would think the opposite would be true , since legal discrimination against blacks was illegal, along with a climbing employment rate among black men. 

https://www.city-journal.org/article/th ... rs-of-lies
There's only one answer - White people having sex with ******.  If the races never mixed, then Blacks would take their Black kin and potential mates more seriously.  Also, there would be far less pressure by whites to give "free stuff" to blacks.
 
User avatar
Kobia2
23 Jan 2024 12:54 pm
User avatar
     
2,726 posts
Beekeeper » 23 Jan 2024, 1:18 pm » wrote: The destruction of the nuclear black family has its foundations in LBJs "Great Society" WELFARE **** that he used and defined in his statement "I'll have every *** voting Democrat for the next 200 years". He made sure that any REPUBLICAN who attempted to end it would never be elected- or so he thought. Government became "Daddy" to many black babies, an entire network of government workers started "educating" the black race on how to get the government goodies from housing to food stamps. And as  long as these girls never married, they got them for life.

What's so sad about this entire destruction of the black race BY DEMOCRATS is that they brag about it and then double down on how they are supposedly "helping blacks" out of their misery as they push more into the misery dump THEY created and want more of.
     Spot on analysis......
The death spiral ****** find themselves in today began with LBJ's "Great Society"...... The generational breeding of Negro dependence on Government for Votes by the Democrats has reduced them to the status of Special Needs Children... Much of the blame can also be placed on the post MLK Negro leadership who helped facilitate it for personal & political gain.. 

      
Image

     “Everybody has asked the question. . ."What shall we do with the Negro?" I have had but one answer from the beginning. Do nothing with us! Your doing with us has already played the mischief with us. Do nothing with us! If the apples will not remain on the tree of their own strength, if they are wormeaten at the core, if they are early ripe and disposed to fall, let them fall! I am not for tying or fastening them on the tree in any way, except by nature's plan, and if they will not stay there, let them fall. And if the Negro cannot stand on his own legs, let him fall also. All I ask is, give him a chance to stand on his own legs! Let him alone!” ... Frederick Douglass.
 
 
User avatar
Tempest62
23 Jan 2024 3:50 pm
User avatar
     
3,173 posts
I have no empathy for the *** subculture. They made their bed with the left (down, not up) and most are still fighting to stay that way. **** them let them burn out.
 
User avatar
RebelGator
23 Jan 2024 5:25 pm
User avatar
      
11,332 posts
Skans » 23 Jan 2024, 1:50 pm » wrote: There's only one answer - White people having sex with ******.  If the races never mixed, then Blacks would take their Black kin and potential mates more seriously.  Also, there would be far less pressure by whites to give "free stuff" to blacks.
White people...you mean white women?
 
User avatar
Cannonpointer
23 Jan 2024 6:11 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
46,973 posts
impartialobserver » 23 Jan 2024, 12:42 pm » wrote: This is more of a commentary on human nature than politics. You see the same thing in the poorer (and yet very white) areas in the mid-size cities of the West. Reno, SLC, Boise, Spokane... go to the more rundown parts of town and the drug use goes up. Along with drug use is the selling, distributing, and manufacturing. Why? Bigger paydays and less effort. Dangerous and usually you do get caught in the end but in the short term.. the money is good.
You covered the human nature portion of the equation. Now let's look at the cultural aspect.

White folks absolutely look down on the folks that you describe. We do not lionize them. We do not buy their music bragging about their trashy behaviors - assuming they make such. We do not run to their defense when they get sideways with the cops, making their troubles some sort of societal wrong that we need to right. 

So, there in brief is the cultural aspect. 
 
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
murdock
23 Jan 2024 9:57 pm
User avatar
FLAGRANT HOMOSEXUAL, CHILD DANGER
6,474 posts
Vegas » 23 Jan 2024, 10:54 am » wrote: Even black men were getting more jobs, the employment among blacks was climbing before 1964, then it stalled. Since then black women went on welfare, due to fragmented families. It's odd. You would think the opposite would be true , since legal discrimination against blacks was illegal, along with a climbing employment rate among black men. 


https://www.city-journal.org/article/th ... rs-of-lies
WITF does "dove after" mean?
He's dead Jim!
User avatar
sole
24 Jan 2024 5:14 am
User avatar
      
27,273 posts
GHETTO BLASTER » 23 Jan 2024, 11:04 am » wrote: Blacks in general do better when ruled with an Iron Fist.
I submit to you as proof of that statement being true...THE US MILITARY..... :)  
 
Beware the chain of command system by people demanding human rights to believe real isn't real. Dictatorships and democracies don't tolerate instinctive awareness to natural process of evolving in plain sight in their laws that rule social behavior every generation added cradle to grave left alive now.

There is 7,000 years of history to back up my claim. I use a 20 year average to statistically calculate inception to conception of next generation gap changing current population evolving one at a time now(any atmosphere universally present).

This is how I came up with my so called gibberish. It discovered what every deep state of mind people wish true and became truth defended by rule of law placing ideas above evolving in plain sight.

I cover means, motives, methods, philosophy, psychology, psychiatry, hope, faith, charity, academia, arts, economics, politics, religion, 93.75% 5 generation gap limitation of being alive as part of the current population changing forms since shaped a fertilized cell when arrived to naturally timed apart here in this atmosphere in this unique universal position geographically part of everything existing kinetically evolving one at a time now.

the remaining 6.25% exponentially goes back to inception of the first generation of homo sapien lifetime became the first great great grandparent generation gap. Great great grandchildren are the 5th wave of changing population here now arriving one at a time.

I have just kept is simple stupid.

Specific gravity in motion of perpetual balancing outcomes that don't exceed the events going on now.

the whole is equal to the total sum of all its parts. I understand my placement being me since conceived.
User avatar
Skans
24 Jan 2024 7:41 am
User avatar
      
15,413 posts
RebelGator » 23 Jan 2024, 6:25 pm » wrote: White people...you mean white women?
Not just white women.  There are white men, Simps, who are to blame as well.
 
1 2 3 4

Who is online

In total there are 3492 users online :: 16 registered, 16 bots, and 3460 guests
Bots: DuckDuckBot, TTD-Content, SiteLockSpider, MicroMessenger, YandexBot, NING, ADmantX, facebookexternalhit, CriteoBot, proximic, CensysInspect, Mediapartners-Google, Googlebot, bingbot, curl/7, Applebot
Updated less than a minute ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search