Biden on Border Fences in 2006

User avatar
By Huey
27 Jan 2024 11:57 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
3 posts • Page 1 of 1
User avatar
*Huey
27 Jan 2024 11:57 am
User avatar
      
24,357 posts
“Folks, I voted for a fence, I voted, unlike most Democrats – and some of you won’t like it – I voted for 700 miles of fence,” Biden told the group. “But, let me tell you, we can build a fence 40 stories high – unless you change the dynamic in Mexico and – and you will not like this, and – punish American employers who knowingly violate the law when, in fact, they hire illegals. Unless you do those two things, all the rest is window dressing.”  “Now, I know I’m not supposed to say it that bluntly, but they’re the facts, they’re the facts. And so everything else we do is in between here. Everything else we do is at the margins. And the reason why I add that parenthetically, why I believe the fence is needed does not have anything to do with immigration as much as drugs,” Biden continued. “And let me tell you something folks, people are driving across that border with tons, tons, hear me, tons of everything from byproducts for methamphetamine to cocaine to heroin and it’s all coming up through corrupt Mexico.”

https://www.cnn.com/2019/05/10/politics ... index.html

BV, that is your favorite source.  

It seems Biden can't make up his mind.
User avatar
*Huey
27 Jan 2024 12:07 pm
User avatar
      
24,357 posts
It also appears Joe forgot his stance on sanctuary cities:When Biden was running to be the Democratic presidential nominee in 2007, he was unequivocal when asked at a debate about whether he would allow sanctuary cities to ignore federal law.“No,” he responded.

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4 ... stand-now/


While running for the Democratic presidential nomination, Biden was asked, “Would you allow [sanctuary cities] to ignore the federal law regarding the reporting of illegal immigrants and in fact provide sanctuary to these immigrants?

“The reason these cities ignore the federal law is the fact that there is no funding at the federal level to provide for the kind of enforcement at a federal level you need. Pick up The New York Times today, there’s a city not far across the river from my state, that imposed a similar sanctions and what they found out is, as a consequence of that, their city went in the dumps, in the dumpster. Stores started closing, everything started to happen and they changed the policy.”

“Part of the problem is, you have to have a federal government that can enforce laws. This administration has been fundamentally derelict in not funding any of the requirements … needed to enforce existing law.”

 “Senator Biden, yes or no, would you allow those cities to ignore the federal law?” 

 “No,” Biden said.

https://dailycaller.com/2024/01/25/joe- ... ry-cities/

 For the naysayers their is a video at the link.
User avatar
*GHETTO BLASTER
27 Jan 2024 6:21 pm
User avatar
      
11,454 posts
Biden is obviously a [[[JWO PUPPET]]]

https://thehill.com/opinion/4423296-mat ... the-start/

"Matthews: Illegal immigrants double under Biden — and that’s just the start. "
3 posts • Page 1 of 1

Who is online

In total there are 2289 users online :: 3 registered, 14 bots, and 2272 guests
Registered users: Vegas, LowIQTrash, Cannonpointer
Bots: proximic, DuckDuckBot, AHC/2.1, CriteoBot, GPTBot, YandexBot, ADmantX, Mediapartners-Google, bingbot, facebookexternalhit, DuckDuckGo, Applebot, curl/7, Googlebot
Updated 1 minute ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search