Liberal Forum

Don't tell me that getting rid of me for a month is not an attractive incentive for you. 

You win: I am banned for a month.
I win: You are banned for 2 weeks. 

 @R. Suave  @Cannonpointer  

Deal: For 100 consecutive posts (and no, I won’t define consecutive *******. Look it up.) you are to post under the following stipulations:  

1. Absolutely no questions or demands. None. Zip. Nada. Under any circumstances. For 100 consecutive posts, you are not allowed to hide behind that ****. 
2. No copy/paste of anything. Only thoughts of your own. This is your time to shine. You can spend this opportunity to post the usual insults and evasions, or you can actually show the forum that you do indeed have meaningful thoughts of your own. Your choice. 
3. If you do that stupid childish immature tactic of asking a question with an omitted question mark, then you are permanently banned. **** you. 

1. Here comes his predictable usual lie: "You already lost three times." Uggghhhh...Give it up already. Come up with a different lie. 

I know what this sleaze bag is going to do. He will stay up when everyone is sleeping, then do this without telling anyone. Of course, the posts will be brainless phrases. Then he will turn around and say he won. **** that noise Veghead. This only counts when both CP and I hear your agreement and we both know when it begins.

Vegas » 30 Jan 2024, 11:36 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2024, 11:36 am

Don't tell me that getting rid of me for a month is not an attractive incentive for you. 

You win: I am banned for a month.
I win: You are banned for 2 weeks. 

 @R. Suave  @Cannonpointer  

Deal: For 100 consecutive posts (and no, I won’t define consecutive *******. Look it up.) you are to post under the following stipulations:  

1. Absolutely no questions or demands. None. Zip. Nada. Under any circumstances. For 100 consecutive posts, you are not allowed to hide behind that ****. 
2. No copy/paste of anything. Only thoughts of your own. This is your time to shine. You can spend this opportunity to post the usual insults and evasions, or you can actually show the forum that you do indeed have meaningful thoughts of your own. Your choice. 
3. If you do that stupid childish immature tactic of asking a question with an omitted question mark, then you are permanently banned. **** you. 

1. Here comes his predictable usual lie: "You already lost three times." Uggghhhh...Give it up already. Come up with a different lie.

It's only an incentive if you actually uphold your end.

But you don't.

Get a room

R.Suave » 30 Jan 2024, 11:59 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2024, 11:59 am

It's only an incentive if you actually uphold your end.

But you don't.

     I am not the one modding it *******. Why do you think I tagged CP? He has the controls to ban. 

God man. You are so **** stupid.

Vegas » 30 Jan 2024, 11:36 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2024, 11:36 am

Don't tell me that getting rid of me for a month is not an attractive incentive for you. 

You win: I am banned for a month.
I win: You are banned for 2 weeks. 

 @R. Suave  

Deal: For 100 consecutive posts (and no, I won’t define consecutive *******. Look it up.) you are to post under the following stipulations:  

1. Absolutely no questions or demands. None. Zip. Nada. Under any circumstances. For 100 consecutive posts, you are not allowed to hide behind that ****. 
2. No copy/paste of anything. Only thoughts of your own. This is your time to shine. You can spend this opportunity to post the usual insults and evasions, or you can actually show the forum that you do indeed have meaningful thoughts of your own. Your choice. 
3. If you do that stupid childish immature tactic of asking a question with an omitted question mark, then you are permanently banned. **** you. 

1. Here comes his predictable usual lie: "You already lost three times." Uggghhhh...Give it up already. Come up with a different lie.

This deal takes away all of his hiding places.    There is no way in hell he will agree to that. 

Mrkelly » 30 Jan 2024, 11:59 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2024, 11:59 am

Get a room

The room is getting smaller.

Mrkelly » 30 Jan 2024, 11:59 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2024, 11:59 am

Get a room

You appear to be the monkey in your pic.

R.Suave » 30 Jan 2024, 11:59 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2024, 11:59 am

It's only an incentive if you actually uphold your end.

But you don't.

It sure seems to me that somebody's got a schoolboy crush on YOU!  

maineman » 30 Jan 2024, 12:22 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2024, 12:22 pm

It sure seems to me that somebody's got a schoolboy crush on YOU!

Have you seen how many times he tags @Huey  and I?    Trust me. The ratio between his tags to mine are statistically insignificant. 

Vegas » 30 Jan 2024, 12:00 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2024, 12:00 pm

     I am not the one modding it *******. Why do you think I tagged CP? He has the controls to ban. 

God man. You are so **** stupid.

You admit that you welshed previously.
 
 

maineman » 30 Jan 2024, 12:22 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2024, 12:22 pm

It sure seems to me that somebody's got a schoolboy crush on YOU!

I have that effect on living things..

R.Suave » 30 Jan 2024, 12:36 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2024, 12:36 pm

You admit that you welshed previously.

   God your lies are so blatant. I would ask you to prove it, but we both know how you feel about questions, so I won't bother. 

Vegas » 30 Jan 2024, 12:26 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2024, 12:26 pm

Have you seen how many times he tags @Huey  and I?    Trust me. The ratio between his tags to mine are statistically insignificant.

does he start tribute threads about you?



oh...and it's Huey and ME.  fyi

maineman » 30 Jan 2024, 12:39 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2024, 12:39 pm

does he start tribute threads about you?

Yes. He tags me in his OPs. Pay attention. Just because you are both libtards doesn't mean that you can't focus. 

maineman » 30 Jan 2024, 12:39 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2024, 12:39 pm

oh...and it's Huey and ME.  fyi

You sure? I was always taught it was _______ and I.
 

Vegas » 30 Jan 2024, 12:40 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2024, 12:40 pm

You sure? I was always taught it was _______ and I.

it depends on whether the pronoun is the subject or object of the verb.

Have you seen how many times I tag him?  You wouldn't say "I tag HE", would you?
 

maineman » 30 Jan 2024, 12:39 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2024, 12:39 pm

does he start tribute threads about you?

oh...and it's Huey and ME.  fyi

This post started out stupid and went downhill from there...

 
 

maineman » 30 Jan 2024, 12:44 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2024, 12:44 pm

it depends on whether the pronoun is the subject or object of the verb.

Have you seen how many times I tag him?  You wouldn't say "I tag HE", would you?

I looked it up. It appears you are correct. My bad.


Hey @R. Suave  , it appears you have another repetitive go-to post to use on me. God knows you will use this 300 million times. 

Just know, I can do it right back at ya, hypocrite boy, given all of the stupid **** you have said. 

What's to keep either one of you making a new account?