I'm sorry .... I quit reading your posts a year ago.Vegas » 30 Jan 2024, 11:36 am » wrote: ↑ Don't tell me that getting rid of me for a month is not an attractive incentive for you.
You win: I am banned for a month.
I win: You are banned for 2 weeks.
@R. Suave @Cannonpointer
Deal: For 100 consecutive posts (and no, I won’t define consecutive *******. Look it up.) you are to post under the following stipulations:1. Here comes his predictable usual lie: "You already lost three times." Uggghhhh...Give it up already. Come up with a different lie.
- Absolutely no questions or demands. None. Zip. Nada. Under any circumstances. For 100 consecutive posts, you are not allowed to hide behind that ****.
- No copy/paste of anything. Only thoughts of your own. This is your time to shine. You can spend this opportunity to post the usual insults and evasions, or you can actually show the forum that you do indeed have meaningful thoughts of your own. Your choice.
- If you do that stupid childish immature tactic of asking a question with an omitted question mark, then you are permanently banned. **** you.
You are.Vegas » 31 Jan 2024, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑ I am not the one running from a simple deal.
I am not the one lying about past deals that you never did.
Coward.
Post my admission.Vegas » 31 Jan 2024, 12:37 pm » wrote: ↑ @R. Suave speaking of you being a lying sack of ****, since you admitted to lying about that pic, you should man up and acknowledge that you are a disgusting scumbag.
Hey look....you were the one that admitted it, so that's on you.
R.Suave » 31 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm » wrote: ↑ You are.
Watch...
Post any evidence that you are capable of Thought.
Vegas » 31 Jan 2024, 1:04 pm » wrote: ↑ You are now doing the "No, it's you" tactic. That's textbook narcissism.
Again, we already went through that. Compare OPs. .
Now watch this: What was your understanding of the deal you eagerly agreed to?
And run....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHhyPttsGsk&t=1s
I have.Again, we already went through that. Compare OPs. .
Now watch this: What was your understanding of the deal you eagerly agreed to?
Your have no thoughts. At all. Not ever. Which is why you have to lie about winning the challenge.
More irrational gibberish.@Cannonpointer
once you've read this, toss Vegas for the amount of time he proposed.
You challenged me to post an example where I used my wiles to oblige you to make an *** of yourself.
I did.
The "wily" trick I employed to exploit your stupid?
I answered your question, directly.
Regardless of what I posted as evidence, you would insist that your Stupid is evidence that you've been "victimized".
And my prediction has proven 100% accurate.
You appear to be Hitler's gay brother in yours. Heck, if it was the 1970's, you could join these guys, sing songs, dance and lick gay biker ***....
@R. Suave in case you need reminding of the deal that proves how dumb you are. You agreed to this.Deal: Post one example that I ever fell for one of your lies and dishonest posts
And then you happily gave an example.@CannonpointerVegas » 31 Jan 2024, 1:42 pm » wrote: ↑ Your have no thoughts. At all. Not ever. Which is why you have to lie about winning the challenge.
More irrational gibberish.
Answer this question. You have evaded too many times, even for you: What was your understanding about the deal that you eagerly agreed to?
1. Evade again. As always. Every time.
as you won't.R. Suave » 30 Jan 2024, 11:59 am » wrote: ↑ It's only an incentive if you actually uphold your end.
But you don't.
Are you now saying that this is, in fact, evidence that you're a liar and a moron?Vegas » 31 Jan 2024, 3:07 pm » wrote: ↑ Translation: Veghead owned himself, so he is going to project his stupidity on me.
What did you think this deal meant: "Post one example of your lies and dishonest posts that I ever fell for."
More evasions. Evasion after evasion after evasion....
How does any debate have two sides working 6 degrees of separation? Your one track mentality is a dead giveaway your brain isn't adapting as displaced.R. Suave » 31 Jan 2024, 3:10 pm » wrote: ↑ Are you now saying that this is, in fact, evidence that you're a liar and a moron?
It has to be one or the other.