Facts nurture minds as people find it easier to follow consensus and pick sides than have eternal hell come knocking on their door by people demanding human rights to ignore genetic timing as displaced in plain sight evolving uniquely here at the same time.
yes
Do you understand why they are used?Mrkelly » 31 Jan 2024, 4:57 pm » wrote: ↑ yes
I was talking about callout threads
do you know what that means?
Yes
Mrkelly » 31 Jan 2024, 4:57 pm » wrote: ↑ yes
I was talking about callout threads
do you know what that means?
I was pointing out your hard on for himVegas » 31 Jan 2024, 5:04 pm » wrote: ↑ I don't care what you were talking about. You challenged my claim. My claim was about 'tags.'
I don't expect you to admit that you lied about what I said, but it doesn't hurt to expose you anyway.
Ridicule by a mob mentality defending the ground they conquered through power of suggestion corrupting other peoples ancestors added as last generation arrived forward now..
Does the picture demonstrateVegas » 31 Jan 2024, 3:51 pm » wrote: ↑ Dude, look...you **** up. Projecting won't help you. It never does.
Now acknowledge the following:
1. That you admitted the pic represents my mistake and NOT a lie. In short, you admit that you are lying by saying I was lying.
2. That you are indeed a lying sack of ****, as you admitted by agreeing to the deal in the first place.
Now!
Interpreting other people's post into your intellectual perception of life learned after birth isn't describing their perception 0of life learned after birth.R. Suave » 31 Jan 2024, 5:40 pm » wrote: ↑ Does the picture demonstrate
A) that I answer questions
B) You lie about me answering questions
C) You don't read posts.
?
R.Suave » 31 Jan 2024, 5:40 pm » wrote: ↑ Does the picture demonstrate
A) that I answer questions
B) You lie about me answering questions
C) You don't read posts.
?
The post where the bet was offered, the post where the bet was accepted, and the post where you proved up on the challenge or otherwise dummied him into losing the bet.
Do you answer, the first time around, habitually?Vegas » 31 Jan 2024, 9:23 pm » wrote: ↑ A). No. Not the first time around...habitually. How many times...
B) Nope. You have yet to demonstrate that you answer the first time around habitually.
C) Projecting.
Your turn:
Explain your understanding of the deal that you eagerly agreed to.
1. I lost count of how many evasions...but I can count on another one.
Cool.Cannonpointer » 31 Jan 2024, 9:44 pm » wrote: ↑ The post where the bet was offered, the post where the bet was accepted, and the post where you proved up on the challenge or otherwise dummied him into losing the bet.
Cannonpointer » 31 Jan 2024, 9:44 pm » wrote: ↑ The post where the bet was offered, the post where the bet was accepted, and the post where you proved up on the challenge or otherwise dummied him into losing the bet.
I asked you, lying coward.Vegas » 01 Feb 2024, 10:13 am » wrote: ↑ Ask other members. You will just call me a liar, so ask everyone else.
You sure as hell don't.
What was your understanding of the deal that you eagerly agreed to?
Vegas » 01 Feb 2024, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑ I have already answered this a million times. I answer questions to those who also answer questions. That obviously doesn't apply to you, Darth Evader.
Evidence of you evading? Sure. Watch this:
and...run.....
the first time?I answer questions to those who also answer questions