Liberal Forum

GHETTO » wrote:

29 Jan 1970, 12:15 pm

Huey » 30 Jan 2024, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2024, 2:26 pm

Past comments on past immigration bills that did not age well:When the U.S. Congress passed—and President Lyndon B. Johnson signed into law—the Immigration and Naturalization Act of 1965, the move was largely seen as symbolic.
 "The bill will not flood our cities with immigrants,” lead supporter Sen. Edward “Ted” Kennedy (D-Mass.) told the Senate during debate. “It will not upset the ethnic mix of our society. It will not relax the standards of admission. It will not cause American workers to lose their jobs.”That sentiment was echoed by Johnson, who, upon signing the act on October 3, 1965, said the bill would not be revolutionary: “It does not affect the lives of millions … It will not reshape the structure of our daily lives or add importantly to either our wealth or our power.”

https://www.history.com/news/immigratio ... 65-changes

Nice find...!
The die was cast way back then...but the [[[JWO]]] patiently waited for the patriotic WWII Generation to die off before daring to "ramp up" the pace of their Illegal Alien Invasion Program to what it is now.
 
 

 

R.Suave » 31 Jan 2024, 8:27 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jan 2024, 8:27 am

Between you and the OP, we're talking world class stupid.

RebelGator » 31 Jan 2024, 8:54 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jan 2024, 8:54 am

It's apparent that you have never owned a business where it was necessary to recognize a problem and then apply a fix to the problem.....it's almost like you were a government bureaucrat, or something.

R.Suave » 31 Jan 2024, 8:22 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jan 2024, 8:22 am

The citation doesn't match the OP.

I suspect it was provided by the arm up the OP's ***..

 "The bill will not flood our cities with immigrants,”

Huey » 31 Jan 2024, 8:56 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jan 2024, 8:56 am

Someone say something from the peanut gallery?

I guess you are tone deaf.  Listen to the mayors of Denver, Chicago, NYC....

You live in a lily-white state and are immune to such issues.

R.Suave » 31 Jan 2024, 9:05 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jan 2024, 9:05 am

Hides behind a question.

R.Suave » 31 Jan 2024, 8:26 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jan 2024, 8:26 am

Why?

Do you know anything about the history of such efforts?

Huey » 31 Jan 2024, 7:33 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jan 2024, 7:33 am

Thanks to title 42 and other things there wasn't much to bitch about concerning the border relative to now.  Remember, partisan, your boy immediately went to the oval office to undo everything Trump.  That is why we are where we are not now concerning the border.  Remain in Mexico was working so well that Mexico had to secure it's southern border Title 42 became a two for one deal.

Your whataboutism just went down the toilet.  And remember, Partisan, this thread is about Biden.  

Now, I had plenty of thread bitching about Trump but the border was not one of them, Partisan.

Mrkelly » 31 Jan 2024, 9:19 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jan 2024, 9:19 am

so at no other time in history 

NO  president could fine the hell out employers for hiring illegals ?

Huey » 31 Jan 2024, 9:23 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jan 2024, 9:23 am

This is about Biden.  No matter how hard you try.  Biden voted for the 1986 bill that gave wider authority to fine employers.

Mrkelly » 31 Jan 2024, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jan 2024, 9:27 am

That's what partisans do

they avoid any discussion about their sides faults 

I have dumped on biden  a lot

you going after tRump?

not so much

Huey » 31 Jan 2024, 9:31 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jan 2024, 9:31 am

This thread is about Biden.  Feel free to start your own thread.

As far a Trump, I have no issues with his immigration policy.

Mrkelly » 31 Jan 2024, 9:37 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jan 2024, 9:37 am

Of course you don't 

tRump can do no wrong 

you guys need a new leader 

this one is a hack

Huey » 31 Jan 2024, 9:42 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jan 2024, 9:42 am

You come in here whining about partisans, ignore Biden, and complain about others and Trump.

**** Hypocrite.

Go start a thread.

Mrkelly » 31 Jan 2024, 9:47 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jan 2024, 9:47 am

That's the point skippy

I don't ignore biden 

but tRump is  your God
 

 

Bidencrimefamily » 30 Jan 2024, 2:56 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2024, 2:56 pm

No that's what Biden new border deal will do.

“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” LAVRENTIY BERIA "Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." brown's unheeded words of wisdom

Kobia2 » 31 Jan 2024, 9:56 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jan 2024, 9:56 am

 
        Plenty of blame to go around..... The issues with our Southwest Border should have been addressed decades ago by both Parties... Much of the problem is traced to as the numbers of people crossed the Border, the Hispanic Vote in this country became a powerful enough Block where they could factor in elections ----- thus they became in a position where they could hold our politicians hostage.... Where I fault the Democrats is they adopted the political strategy of fanning the perception that any tightening of the Border or enforcement of our immigration laws was an attack on the Hispanic community... 

Huey » 30 Jan 2024, 3:51 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2024, 3:51 pm

This discussion is about Biden and what he really wants.  Right now, Biden is President.  Right now, that precludes the others.  You are using the same excuse my sons used as children.  "But he didn't do it".  "Or, he gets away with it".

You are diverting.  Because you go nuttin'. 

Biden has had the ability to do what he said needed to be done in the past.  And you can say is "no one else did it".

“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” LAVRENTIY BERIA "Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." brown's unheeded words of wisdom