Liberal Forum

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/02/us/p ... oters.html
Trump’s Tariffs Hurt U.S. Jobs but Swayed American Voters, Study Says

New research finds that former President Donald J. Trump’s tariffs did not bring back U.S. jobs, but voters appeared to reward him for the levies anyway.

**** idiots.

 The sweeping tariffs that former President Donald J. Trump imposed on China and other American trading partners were simultaneously a political success and an economic failure, a new study suggests. That’s because the levies won over voters for the Republican Party even though they did not bring back jobs.

 The nonpartisan working paper examines monthly data on U.S. employment by industry to find that the tariffs that Mr. Trump placed on foreign metals, washing machines and an array of goods from China starting in 2018 neither raised nor lowered the overall number of jobs in the affected industries.

 But the tariffs did incite other countries to impose their own retaliatory tariffs on American products, making them more expensive to sell overseas, and those levies had a negative effect on American jobs, the paper finds. That was particularly true in agriculture: Farmers who exported soybeans, cotton and sorghum to China were hit by Beijing’s decision to raise tariffs on those products to as much as 25 percent.

 The Trump administration aimed to offset those losses by offering financial support for farmers, ultimately giving out $23 billion in 2018 and 2019. But those funds were distributed unevenly, a government assessment found, and the economists say those subsidies only partially mitigated the harm that had been caused by the tariffs.

"B...b...b...b...Solynduhra!"

 
 

R.Suave » 02 Feb 2024, 8:55 am » wrote: ↑

02 Feb 2024, 8:55 am

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/02/us/p ... oters.html
Trump’s Tariffs Hurt U.S. Jobs but Swayed American Voters, Study Says

New research finds that former President Donald J. Trump’s tariffs did not bring back U.S. jobs, but voters appeared to reward him for the levies anyway.

**** idiots.

 The sweeping tariffs that former President Donald J. Trump imposed on China and other American trading partners were simultaneously a political success and an economic failure, a new study suggests. That’s because the levies won over voters for the Republican Party even though they did not bring back jobs.

 The nonpartisan working paper examines monthly data on U.S. employment by industry to find that the tariffs that Mr. Trump placed on foreign metals, washing machines and an array of goods from China starting in 2018 neither raised nor lowered the overall number of jobs in the affected industries.

 But the tariffs did incite other countries to impose their own retaliatory tariffs on American products, making them more expensive to sell overseas, and those levies had a negative effect on American jobs, the paper finds. That was particularly true in agriculture: Farmers who exported soybeans, cotton and sorghum to China were hit by Beijing’s decision to raise tariffs on those products to as much as 25 percent.

 The Trump administration aimed to offset those losses by offering financial support for farmers, ultimately giving out $23 billion in 2018 and 2019. But those funds were distributed unevenly, a government assessment found, and the economists say those subsidies only partially mitigated the harm that had been caused by the tariffs.

"B...b...b...b...Solynduhra!"

No thoughts, etc...copy/paste. TDS level 10. 

Media comment substantiated again. 
 

Vegas » 02 Feb 2024, 3:38 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Feb 2024, 3:38 pm

No thoughts, etc...copy/paste. TDS level 10. 

Media comment substantiated again.

I already told you this.


Don't be so small because I'm prescient...

R.Suave » 02 Feb 2024, 3:51 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Feb 2024, 3:51 pm

I already told you this.

Don't be so small because I'm prescient...

You didn't say ****. You have no thoughts of your own. Therefore, it's impossible for you to have said anything intelligent. 

Vegas » 02 Feb 2024, 4:26 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Feb 2024, 4:26 pm

You didn't say ****. You have no thoughts of your own. Therefore, it's impossible for you to have said anything intelligent.

There's cheese...

There's the fact that someone has been consistently trashing your media's narratives about the economy and Biden....that being me, of course.

There's your gas price poll...

Your innumeracy...

Your malapropisms...

I could go on..
 

R.Suave » 02 Feb 2024, 4:41 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Feb 2024, 4:41 pm

There's cheese...

 

      1/1000s. How in the hell could you be impressed with that stat?

There's the fact that someone has been consistently trashing your media's narratives about the economy and Biden....that being me, of course.

There's your gas price poll...

Your innumeracy...

Your malapropisms...

I could go on..

All vague accusations. Nothing of substance. 

Here is an example of specifics: 
1. Survivorship bias.
2. 100% of 90. 
3. Exp model vs log model
4. Linear graphs vs exponential graphs. 
5. Agreeing to deal where you wanted to prove that you were a liar. 
6. Cannot define "bias."
7. Thinks 1/1000s is an impressive stat. 
8. No thoughts of your own...ever. 
9. Cannot differentiate between raw tabulated data vs percents and proportions. 
10. 100% accuracy.

Shall I go on?

Vegas » 02 Feb 2024, 4:52 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Feb 2024, 4:52 pm

      1/1000s. How in the hell could you be impressed with that stat?

All vague accusations. Nothing of substance. 

Here is an example of specifics: 
1. Survivorship bias.
2. 100% of 90. 
3. Exp model vs log model
4. Linear graphs vs exponential graphs. 
5. Agreeing to deal where you wanted to prove that you were a liar. 
6. Cannot define "bias."
7. Thinks 1/1000s is an impressive stat. 
8. No thoughts of your own...ever. 
9. Cannot differentiate between raw tabulated data vs percents and proportions. 
10. 100% accuracy.

Shall I go on?

All fiction.

 

R.Suave » 02 Feb 2024, 4:57 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Feb 2024, 4:57 pm

All fiction.

Like I would expect you to admit to it. Duh. 

Moron. 

 

R. Suave » 02 Feb 2024, 8:55 am » wrote: ↑

02 Feb 2024, 8:55 am

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/02/us/p ... oters.html
Trump’s Tariffs Hurt U.S. Jobs but Swayed American Voters, Study Says

New research finds that former President Donald J. Trump’s tariffs did not bring back U.S. jobs, but voters appeared to reward him for the levies anyway.

**** idiots.

 The sweeping tariffs that former President Donald J. Trump imposed on China and other American trading partners were simultaneously a political success and an economic failure, a new study suggests. That’s because the levies won over voters for the Republican Party even though they did not bring back jobs.

 The nonpartisan working paper examines monthly data on U.S. employment by industry to find that the tariffs that Mr. Trump placed on foreign metals, washing machines and an array of goods from China starting in 2018 neither raised nor lowered the overall number of jobs in the affected industries.

 But the tariffs did incite other countries to impose their own retaliatory tariffs on American products, making them more expensive to sell overseas, and those levies had a negative effect on American jobs, the paper finds. That was particularly true in agriculture: Farmers who exported soybeans, cotton and sorghum to China were hit by Beijing’s decision to raise tariffs on those products to as much as 25 percent.

 The Trump administration aimed to offset those losses by offering financial support for farmers, ultimately giving out $23 billion in 2018 and 2019. But those funds were distributed unevenly, a government assessment found, and the economists say those subsidies only partially mitigated the harm that had been caused by the tariffs.

"B...b...b...b...Solynduhra!"

 
 

Dick suckers like you swallow everything the TV tells you. You really are stupid.

R. » wrote:

29 Jan 1970, 12:55 pm

Vegas » 02 Feb 2024, 3:38 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Feb 2024, 3:38 pm

No thoughts, etc...copy/paste. TDS level 10. 

Media comment substantiated again.

I already told you this.


Don't be so small because I'm prescient...

 

No, you are not.   You are just an Avg Joe living a middle class life in a shared wall duplex....oh, excuse me, a 40 year old condo ex.

Maybe you should invest with bob @SOCK SAVINGS  

Huey » 02 Feb 2024, 5:20 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Feb 2024, 5:20 pm

No, you are not.   You are just an Avg Joe living a middle class life in a shared wall duplex....oh, excuse me, a 40 year old condo ex.

Maybe you should invest with bob @SOCK SAVINGS

Hello friend. 
Character @R. Suave  is a Child Groomer Sexual Predator

SOCK SAVINGS does not do business with these types.

Bob


 
 

SSL services are not available to any user tagged or formerly tagged "Child Groomer, Sexual Predator" per India banking policies. End of story. 

SCHUMER PRAISES TRUMP FOR CHINA TARIFFS
 

 

murdock » 02 Feb 2024, 5:17 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Feb 2024, 5:17 pm

Dick suckers like you swallow everything the TV tells you. You really are stupid.

The NYT is a newspaper.

People, who aren't stupid, know this.

R. Suave » 02 Feb 2024, 6:54 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Feb 2024, 6:54 pm

The NYT is a newspaper.

People, who aren't stupid, know this.

Everybody knows that you **** child raping idiot.

R.Suave » 02 Feb 2024, 8:55 am » wrote: ↑

02 Feb 2024, 8:55 am

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/02/us/p ... oters.html
Trump’s Tariffs Hurt U.S. Jobs but Swayed American Voters, Study Says

New research finds that former President Donald J. Trump’s tariffs did not bring back U.S. jobs, but voters appeared to reward him for the levies anyway.

**** idiots.

 The sweeping tariffs that former President Donald J. Trump imposed on China and other American trading partners were simultaneously a political success and an economic failure, a new study suggests. That’s because the levies won over voters for the Republican Party even though they did not bring back jobs.

 The nonpartisan working paper examines monthly data on U.S. employment by industry to find that the tariffs that Mr. Trump placed on foreign metals, washing machines and an array of goods from China starting in 2018 neither raised nor lowered the overall number of jobs in the affected industries.

 But the tariffs did incite other countries to impose their own retaliatory tariffs on American products, making them more expensive to sell overseas, and those levies had a negative effect on American jobs, the paper finds. That was particularly true in agriculture: Farmers who exported soybeans, cotton and sorghum to China were hit by Beijing’s decision to raise tariffs on those products to as much as 25 percent.

 The Trump administration aimed to offset those losses by offering financial support for farmers, ultimately giving out $23 billion in 2018 and 2019. But those funds were distributed unevenly, a government assessment found, and the economists say those subsidies only partially mitigated the harm that had been caused by the tariffs.

"B...b...b...b...Solynduhra!"

  What did you expect?
Trump doesn't know ****.
 

Squatchman » 03 Feb 2024, 5:30 am » wrote: ↑

03 Feb 2024, 5:30 am

  What did you expect?
Trump doesn't know ****.
 

I see you're still sucking on the media dick. Ignorant bastard.

murdock » 03 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm

I see you're still sucking on the media dick. Ignorant bastard.

He sounds like a moron.

Everyone who has dealt with him says he's a moron..


But you know better.

R. Suave » 03 Feb 2024, 7:03 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Feb 2024, 7:03 pm

He sounds like a moron.

Everyone who has dealt with him says he's a moron..


But you know better.

Failure to understand the simplicity and self evident results of balancing in the moment adapting as uniquely displaced trying to prove one is exceptional besides being unique like any other ancestor.

R. Suave » 03 Feb 2024, 7:03 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Feb 2024, 7:03 pm

He sounds like a moron.

Everyone who has dealt with him says he's a moron..


But you know better.

I know he's a moron, either that or he plays one on the internet.

R.Suave » 02 Feb 2024, 8:55 am » wrote: ↑

02 Feb 2024, 8:55 am

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/02/us/p ... oters.html
Trump’s Tariffs Hurt U.S. Jobs but Swayed American Voters, Study Says

New research finds that former President Donald J. Trump’s tariffs did not bring back U.S. jobs, but voters appeared to reward him for the levies anyway.

**** idiots.

 The sweeping tariffs that former President Donald J. Trump imposed on China and other American trading partners were simultaneously a political success and an economic failure, a new study suggests. That’s because the levies won over voters for the Republican Party even though they did not bring back jobs.

 The nonpartisan working paper examines monthly data on U.S. employment by industry to find that the tariffs that Mr. Trump placed on foreign metals, washing machines and an array of goods from China starting in 2018 neither raised nor lowered the overall number of jobs in the affected industries.

 But the tariffs did incite other countries to impose their own retaliatory tariffs on American products, making them more expensive to sell overseas, and those levies had a negative effect on American jobs, the paper finds. That was particularly true in agriculture: Farmers who exported soybeans, cotton and sorghum to China were hit by Beijing’s decision to raise tariffs on those products to as much as 25 percent.

 The Trump administration aimed to offset those losses by offering financial support for farmers, ultimately giving out $23 billion in 2018 and 2019. But those funds were distributed unevenly, a government assessment found, and the economists say those subsidies only partially mitigated the harm that had been caused by the tariffs.

"B...b...b...b...Solynduhra!"

No thoughts, etc...copy/paste. As always. 

TDS level 10. (The same response of "what's not to loathe...to which I give...well you know the repetitive ****.)

Media comment justified, as always.