Liberal Forum

Here is the new firearm that will cause gun grabbers, gunophobes, those who lose their shot guns in their house, and overall gun illiterate people to lose their minds.


This weapon is a 7.62 x 51.  The Army wanted a heavier round than the 5.56 because in battle the 5.56 has had issue in battle.  It is not the super round that the gun ignorant were told it is.
 
 

I can see the wimpy gunophobes now:




Remember, invest with @SOCK SAVINGS  
 

5.56 is under rated. True it may not have the stopping power or range but, When you wound a combatant, it takes at least 3 out of the fight. And carrying 13 mags full of 5.56 is a lot lighter than 7.62.

PhiloBeddo » 03 Feb 2024, 2:44 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Feb 2024, 2:44 pm

5.56 is under rated. True it may not have the stopping power or range but, When you wound a combatant, it takes at least 3 out of the fight. And carrying 13 mags full of 5.56 is a lot lighter than 7.62.

That's true.  But the complaints about the 5.56 were it didn't have the stopping power.  And the military version will be a 6.8 mm.

Huey » 03 Feb 2024, 2:18 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Feb 2024, 2:18 pm

Here is the new firearm that will cause gun grabbers, gunophobes, those who lose their shot guns in their house, and overall gun illiterate people to lose their minds.


This weapon is a 7.62 x 51.  The Army wanted a heavier round than the 5.56 because in battle the 5.56 has had issue in battle.  It is not the super round that the gun ignorant were told it is.

Waiting for @R. Suave  to chime in and get curb stomped. 

Vegas » 03 Feb 2024, 3:01 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Feb 2024, 3:01 pm

Huey » 03 Feb 2024, 2:18 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Feb 2024, 2:18 pm

Here is the new firearm that will cause gun grabbers, gunophobes, those who lose their shot guns in their house, and overall gun illiterate people to lose their minds.


This weapon is a 7.62 x 51.  The Army wanted a heavier round than the 5.56 because in battle the 5.56 has had issue in battle.  It is not the super round that the gun ignorant were told it is.

Waiting for @R. Suave  to chime in and get curb stomped. 

 

The M 16 platform is such a super duper killing machine they are replacing it.

F16 is one of the best fighter jets of all time.

So replace it with a TRILLION$$ money-pit glitchy POS - F35.

Huey » 03 Feb 2024, 3:06 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Feb 2024, 3:06 pm

The M 16 platform is such a super duper killing machine they are replacing it.

No one on Earth is this stupid.

Huey » 03 Feb 2024, 2:59 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Feb 2024, 2:59 pm

That's true.  But the complaints about the 5.56 were it didn't have the stopping power.  And the military version will be a 6.8 mm.

More than true, it is the point.

Even if nothing can be done to make you understand it..
 

R. » wrote:

29 Jan 1970, 1:09 pm

Huey » 03 Feb 2024, 3:06 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Feb 2024, 3:06 pm

The M 16 platform is such a super duper killing machine they are replacing it.

No one on Earth is this stupid.

 

Yes, you are.

R. » wrote:

29 Jan 1970, 1:09 pm

Huey » 03 Feb 2024, 2:59 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Feb 2024, 2:59 pm

That's true.  But the complaints about the 5.56 were it didn't have the stopping power.  And the military version will be a 6.8 mm.

More than true, it is the point.

Even if nothing can be done to make you understand it..
 

 

You shouldn't be trying to discuss topics in which you are ignorant.

Tell me, does this weapon fire a round 5x faster than any other?     You went on for days covering for Biden over that bit of dumbassery.

Huey » 03 Feb 2024, 2:18 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Feb 2024, 2:18 pm

Here is the new firearm that will cause gun grabbers, gunophobes, those who lose their shot guns in their house, and overall gun illiterate people to lose their minds.


This weapon is a 7.62 x 51.  The Army wanted a heavier round than the 5.56 because in battle the 5.56 has had issue in battle.  It is not the super round that the gun ignorant were told it is.
 
 

Isn't that Russian ammunition?

Nostradamus' » wrote:

29 Jan 1970, 1:09 pm

Huey » 03 Feb 2024, 2:18 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Feb 2024, 2:18 pm

Here is the new firearm that will cause gun grabbers, gunophobes, those who lose their shot guns in their house, and overall gun illiterate people to lose their minds.


This weapon is a 7.62 x 51.  The Army wanted a heavier round than the 5.56 because in battle the 5.56 has had issue in battle.  It is not the super round that the gun ignorant were told it is.
 
 

 

Isn't that Russian ammunition?

 

No.The 6.8x51mm Common Cartridge, also known as the .277 Fury, was developed by Sig Sauer as part of the United States Army’s Next Generation Squad Weapon Program…more on that in a minute. 

https://www.pewpewtactical.com/6-8x51mm-277-fury/

@R. Suave   you might want to read that article and get a little knowledge on why they are switching from 5.56.  That is a freebie although I did your work for you.

 

Huey » 03 Feb 2024, 2:18 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Feb 2024, 2:18 pm

Here is the new firearm that will cause gun grabbers, gunophobes, those who lose their shot guns in their house, and overall gun illiterate people to lose their minds.


This weapon is a 7.62 x 51.  The Army wanted a heavier round than the 5.56 because in battle the 5.56 has had issue in battle.  It is not the super round that the gun ignorant were told it is.

A whole bunch of doctors, ballistics engineers and military tacticians determine that the key objective in the assault of a defended position revolves around the "temporary cavity", and its consequences.

They spend decades, and millions, developing both the round and a "delivery platform" in the belief that they provide a superior alternative to available options. 

The US military recognizes the virtues and adopts the weapon. It proves effective in combat. Armies all over the world buy it. Hundreds of thousands of dead and wounded validate the concept.

In 2017, some ******* slack jawed ammosexual begins to spew a bunch of uninformed crap, et voila, the AR-15/M16 family of weapons was now exclusively developed for sport.

Why?

Because body armor counter measures didn't stop developing...decades spent neutralizing the effectiveness of the M16 to generate temporary cavities should eventually pay off in increased protection.

But to *******, slack jawed ammosexual in 2024, it's because it was never any good anyway. 

So pew-pew, tactically,  away at each other kids..

 
 

Huey » 03 Feb 2024, 4:05 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Feb 2024, 4:05 pm

No.The 6.8x51mm Common Cartridge, also known as the .277 Fury, was developed by Sig Sauer as part of the United States Army’s Next Generation Squad Weapon Program…more on that in a minute. 

https://www.pewpewtactical.com/6-8x51mm-277-fury/

@R. Suave   you might want to read that article and get a little knowledge on why they are switching from 5.56.  That is a freebie although I did your work for you.

I'm ahead of you, Gay Gunny...

R.Suave » 03 Feb 2024, 4:13 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Feb 2024, 4:13 pm

A whole bunch of doctors, ballistics engineers and military tacticians determine that the key objective in the assault of a defended position revolves around the "temporary cavity", and its consequences.

They spend decades, and millions, developing both the round and a "delivery platform" in the belief that they provide a superior alternative to available options. 

The US military recognizes the virtues and adopts the weapon. It proves effective in combat. Armies all over the world buy it. Hundreds of thousands of dead and wounded validate the concept.

In 2017, some ******* slack jawed ammosexual begins to spew a bunch of uninformed crap, et voila, the AR-15/M16 family of weapons was now exclusively developed for sport.

Why?

Because body armor counter measures didn't stop developing...decades spent neutralizing the effectiveness of the M16 to generate temporary cavities should eventually pay off in increased protection.

But to *******, slack jawed ammosexual in 2024, it's because it was never any good anyway. 

So pew-pew, tactically,  away at each other kids..

LMAO!  Google Soldier, I have posted over the years about the effectiveness of 5.56  Complaints dating back to Vietnam.  

And you can stop with the retellings.  You are either lying about past conversations or you have the memory of a senior citizen in the early stages of Alzheimers.  

A mini 14 in .223 does the exact same thing as an AR 15. But Dems are that stupid.

R.Suave » 03 Feb 2024, 4:16 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Feb 2024, 4:16 pm

I'm ahead of you, Gay Gunny...

I wasn't in the marine's.  That would be your daddy.  I was a Staff Sergeant in the Army.

And apparently you didn't learn much.

Huey » 03 Feb 2024, 4:19 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Feb 2024, 4:19 pm

I wasn't in the marine's.  That would be your daddy.  I was a Staff Sergeant in the Army.

And apparently you didn't learn much.

Well, there's all that stuff you only hint at....darkly, through the fog of war.

This is from an article written in Aug 2002.  I know you claim to be math genius but that is almost 22 years ago.

Vietnam, 1965. According to the Army commander of the first U.S. unit to be engaged with major North Vietnamese Army (NVA) forces, "Even after being hit several times in the chest [with 5.56-mm rounds], many continued firing and moving for several more steps before dropping dead." Another infantry officer said, "In one fire fight, I saw my RTO [radio operator] place three rounds [of 5.56-mm] in the chest of a charging NVA regular at 50 yards. He kept firing his AK [Soviet AK-47 Assault Rifle] and never slowed down. At 30 yards, I hit him with a blast of double-ought buck. It picked him up off his feet and he didn't get up again."

Gulf War, 1991. A Marine officer reported that "several Marines commented that they had to shoot Iraqi soldiers 2-3 or more times with the 62-grain 5.56mm green tip ammo before they stopped firing back at them.... An Iraqi officer, still on fire, faced the firing line of Marines and charged forward firing his weapon from the hip. He didn't hit anyone, but two Marines each nailed him with a three-- round burst from their M-16A2s. One burst hit him immediately above his heart, the other in his belly button. [He] ... kept right on charging and firing until his magazine was empty.... The surgeons told me he certainly died of burns, but not necessary from the six 5.56-mm wounds."

https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedi ... -not-rifle

There is more at the site.  I suggest you read it.  I told you not to delve into topics in which your are ignorant.

This is how a man does it.

Huey » 03 Feb 2024, 4:19 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Feb 2024, 4:19 pm

I wasn't in the marine's.  That would be your daddy.  I was a Staff Sergeant in the Army.

And apparently you didn't learn much.

And "Marines" is capitalized and plural, not genitive