Did you get dibs on his dessert?Huey » 03 Feb 2024, 4:52 pm » wrote: ↑
I did not hear it from a friend. I saw it happen to a friend.
You aren't doing so well. What else you got? Bring it on, Intern!
RedheadedStranger » 03 Feb 2024, 4:51 pm » wrote: ↑ I find it hilarious that Rico's ego simply will NOT allow him to stay away from subjects that he knows little to nothing about.
ok how about this?Huey » 03 Feb 2024, 4:05 pm » wrote: ↑ No.The 6.8x51mm Common Cartridge, also known as the .277 Fury, was developed by Sig Sauer as part of the United States Army’s Next Generation Squad Weapon Program…more on that in a minute.
https://www.pewpewtactical.com/6-8x51mm-277-fury/
@R. Suave you might want to read that article and get a little knowledge on why they are switching from 5.56. That is a freebie although I did your work for you.
You need to work o your zingers, PFC.
You need to work on those two letter words, Expendable.
You tell 'em, Chalk Outline..
That's a question, 30MilesShortNoCars..Huey » 04 Feb 2024, 10:14 am » wrote: ↑ So, Cowardly Too Far", what do you think of the latest semi auto sports rifle designed specifically for the civilian market?
Yeah, you have no knowledge of the subject. It would be a waste of greenies, “No Ordinality”.R.Suave » 04 Feb 2024, 10:19 am » wrote: ↑ That's a question, 30MilesShortNoCars..
Are you good for the 25,000 greenies?
Your rule.
From mister believe anything else is possible than how evolving continues here now leaving results never same total sum again as individually here since conceived to replace those added the conception between inception and extinction of one's ancestral lineage present 5 generations deep after birth, or not..
Everything you know, that is demonstrably true about the AR-15/M16 family of weapons, you learned under the heel of my boot, little Runny.Huey » 04 Feb 2024, 10:22 am » wrote: ↑ Yeah, you have no knowledge of the subject. It would be a waste of greenies, “No Ordinality”.
So you are admitting you are an intellectual tyrant that will do anything to eliminate anyone not complying to your dream state of mind. Wasn't a question but an observation. You practice psychological class warfare to keep others fighting against each other.R. Suave » 04 Feb 2024, 10:24 am » wrote: ↑ Everything you know, that is demonstrably true about the AR-15/M16 family of weapons, you learned under the heel of my boot, little Runny.
HAHAHAHAHA! HooHoo!R.Suave » 04 Feb 2024, 10:24 am » wrote: ↑ Everything you know, that is demonstrably true about the AR-15/M16 family of weapons, you learned under the heel of my boot, little Runny.
Don't melt down.Huey » 04 Feb 2024, 10:31 am » wrote: ↑ HAHAHAHAHA! HooHoo!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
That is the funniest post you have ever made.
This isn't about the AR 15 or M 16. The weapon in question is made by another company and isn't even the same caliber. Now you look dumb.
Son, there is absolutely no context, NONE, where I will find myself under your boot. That includes physical. You had your shot, Cowardly Too Far, and you chickened out. Ad if you jump me in my driveway like you did your neighbor it won't be pepper spray you get shot with. Nod.
I fixed fit or you, Mary. Now, again, this is not about the M16 or the specifically designed for civilian use Colt Sporter. Nod. The subject of the OP, a civilian rifle, is not based on any Colt firearm.R. » wrote:Don't melt down.Huey » 04 Feb 2024, 10:31 am » wrote: ↑ HAHAHAHAHA! HooHoo!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
That is the funniest post you have ever made.
This isn't about the AR 15 or M 16. The weapon in question is made by another company and isn't even the same caliber. Now you look dumb.
Son, there is absolutely no context, NONE, where I will find myself under your boot. That includes physical. You had your shot, Cowardly Too Far, and you chickened out. Ad if you jump me in my driveway like you did your neighbor it won't be pepper spray you get shot with. Nod.
We both know it's true.
I even have to explain your citations to you.
Huey » 04 Feb 2024, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑ I fixed fit or you, Mary. Now, again, this is not about the M16 or the specifically designed for civilian use Colt Sporter. Nod. The subject of the OP, a civilian rifle, is not based on any Colt firearm.
Nod again.
There is no such thing..or the specifically designed for civilian use Colt Sporter.
Does ‘t matter if you think there is or isn’t one.
Obviously not, Bitter Little Twatty...Huey » 04 Feb 2024, 3:11 pm » wrote: ↑ Does ‘t matter if you think there is or isn’t one.
It is about the civilian weapon discussed in the OP.