ConservativeWave » 07 Feb 2024, 7:46 pm » wrote: ↑ YEP... THAT'S RIGHT !! Maine has NOT kept voter rolls up to date... and now, the court has said that disseminating the voter file to the public is ‘necessary’ if they want to ‘fix irregularities’ in the state’s voter rolls.
HA!! BUT, THAT'S a trick question... MAIN DOES NOT want to fix the voter rolls... HOW can the CHEAT if people are WATCHING what they're doing???
"A federal appeals court has ruled in favor of a conservative-backed group, concluding that Maine’s restrictions on the release of voter lists violated the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA)."
"The Public Interest Legal Foundation (PILF) filed a lawsuit in February 2020 after the Maine Secretary of State’s office denied the foundation’s request for a copy of the state’s voter registration file and voting histories in 2019. In a ruling on Feb. 2, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit said that disseminating voter file information to the public is “necessary” if members of the public or organizations are “ever to identify, address, and fix irregularities in states’ voter rolls by exercising their private right of action under the NVRA.”
https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/court- ... DC8A%3D%3D
Every "vote by mail" state has dirty voter registration rolls.ConservativeWave » 07 Feb 2024, 7:46 pm » wrote: ↑ YEP... THAT'S RIGHT !! Maine has NOT kept voter rolls up to date... and now, the court has said that disseminating the voter file to the public is ‘necessary’ if they want to ‘fix irregularities’ in the state’s voter rolls.
HA!! BUT, THAT'S a trick question... MAIN DOES NOT want to fix the voter rolls... HOW can the CHEAT if people are WATCHING what they're doing???
"A federal appeals court has ruled in favor of a conservative-backed group, concluding that Maine’s restrictions on the release of voter lists violated the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA)."
"The Public Interest Legal Foundation (PILF) filed a lawsuit in February 2020 after the Maine Secretary of State’s office denied the foundation’s request for a copy of the state’s voter registration file and voting histories in 2019. In a ruling on Feb. 2, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit said that disseminating voter file information to the public is “necessary” if members of the public or organizations are “ever to identify, address, and fix irregularities in states’ voter rolls by exercising their private right of action under the NVRA.”
https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/court- ... DC8A%3D%3D
ConservativeWave » 07 Feb 2024, 7:46 pm » wrote: ↑ YEP... THAT'S RIGHT !! Maine has NOT kept voter rolls up to date... and now, the court has said that disseminating the voter file to the public is ‘necessary’ if they want to ‘fix irregularities’ in the state’s voter rolls.
HA!! BUT, THAT'S a trick question... MAIN DOES NOT want to fix the voter rolls... HOW can the CHEAT if people are WATCHING what they're doing???
"A federal appeals court has ruled in favor of a conservative-backed group, concluding that Maine’s restrictions on the release of voter lists violated the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA)."
"The Public Interest Legal Foundation (PILF) filed a lawsuit in February 2020 after the Maine Secretary of State’s office denied the foundation’s request for a copy of the state’s voter registration file and voting histories in 2019. In a ruling on Feb. 2, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit said that disseminating voter file information to the public is “necessary” if members of the public or organizations are “ever to identify, address, and fix irregularities in states’ voter rolls by exercising their private right of action under the NVRA.”
https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/court- ... DC8A%3D%3D
If it weren't dirty, they wouldn't be hiding it.maineman » 07 Feb 2024, 9:07 pm » wrote: ↑ nothing in your post says that Maine's rolls are not any less up to date than any other state's
Why, you booking tickets to come **** a sheep again?maineman » 07 Feb 2024, 9:24 pm » wrote: ↑ Hey...yes or no...have they finally passed a law that makes **** sheep illegal in Idaho?
Why, because no dead people have come forward to complain?maineman » 07 Feb 2024, 9:07 pm » wrote: ↑ nothing in your post says that Maine's rolls are not any less up to date than any other state's
RebelGator » 08 Feb 2024, 7:02 am » wrote: ↑ Why, because no dead people have come forward to complain?
Another perfect example of liberal reasoning.
THAT in itself is a form of election FRAUD !golfboy » 07 Feb 2024, 8:06 pm » wrote: ↑ Every "vote by mail" state has dirty voter registration rolls.
Los Angeles was forced to delete 1.6 MILLION bad registrations in a state where they send ballots to everyone registered.
ConservativeWave » 08 Feb 2024, 9:52 am » wrote: ↑ THAT in itself is a form of election FRAUD !
...AND, may be a GREAT reason to RE-ENGINEER the current election systems (in all states) to make them UNIFORM, and FRAUD FREE !!
SOME of the elements that are ABSOLUTELY Required are:
1) Traceable and Verifiable Paper Ballots that are MAINTAINED for 20 years BY LAW (NO exceptions)
2) A National Election day HOLIDAY... ALL elections are Conducted, Completed, and CLOSED on THAT DAY !
3) Computer systems are used to register voters and maintain ACCURATE and UP TO DATE voter records... based on a UNIQUE Identified (i.e. Social Security Number) !
4) Tampering with, or Falsifying, or Manipulating voting records... woill be a FEDERAL OFFENSE, punishable by MANDATORY Jail Time, and Financial Penalties !!
Yea, you live there. How can it NOT be corrupt?maineman » 07 Feb 2024, 10:29 pm » wrote: ↑ got anything to back up your opinion about my state's voter rolls?
IS THAT EVEN AN EXCUSE? If all other states are CORRUPT and DYSFUNCTIONAL... is THAT an excuse for Maine?maineman » 07 Feb 2024, 9:07 pm » wrote: ↑ nothing in your post says that Maine's rolls are not any less up to date than any other state's
NO... it would PROBABLY take a Federal mandate, and action by all 50 states to CLEAN UP, and to MAKE their voting process LESS INCLINED to be CORRUPTED and INFLUENCED by UNSCRUPULOUS and PARTISAN politicians, and SPECIAL Interest groups... Since the states are ULTIMATELY responsible for their voting process !!maineman » 08 Feb 2024, 1:27 pm » wrote: ↑![]()
![]()
All that would take a constitutional amendment.
No way that passes muster in 38 states.