Liberal Forum

Don't underestimate Commander in Chief, Gavin Newsome.

California Secession Movement Pushes for National Divorce as a Means to Prevent ‘Civil War’ (msn.com)

The head of the ‘Yes California’ secessionist movement stressed the urgency of a ‘national divorce’ to avert a possible ‘civil war.’
‘Yes California’ is actively promoting CalExit 3.1, a ballot measure aiming to divide California and create an independent nation named Pacifica in the San Francisco Bay area and central California coast. The campaign has attracted 92,000 supporters through its website, although the exact number of California residents among them remains uncertain. “So right now we’re more working on the concept of national divorce as an alternative to potential civil violence and civil war in the country,” Marinelli told Newsweek on Saturday. "But if things get violent, so be it. We don't play."“Our belief is that there’s a lot of growing political violence and political problems in the country that may lead to fighting in the streets, civil war too, some people are calling for,” Marinelli continued. “We are trying to propose the idea of potentially doing a national divorce of some sort…to avoid that type of situation.”
Georgia Republican Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene has repeatedly used the term ‘national divorce,’ advocating for a separation along party lines. In a February 2023 post on X, formerly known as Twitter, she called for a division between ‘red states and blue states.’ 
In December last year, Greene expressed her concerns on X, writing, “America is in a constitutional crisis. The admin is enabling a full scale border invasion and harboring illegal migrants. The courts are engaging in judicial tyranny. The government is politically weaponized against the people.” “Soon national divorce may be our only option.”

 

good start? each new nation draft their own way of the people living in harmony.

Punch » 08 Feb 2024, 3:03 am » wrote: ↑

08 Feb 2024, 3:03 am

Don't underestimate Commander in Chief, Gavin Newsome.

In a civil war, we get to slaughter the **** that now inhabit that region of california.  So, I opt for civil war.  F- a friendly divorce.  Let the war begin, slaughter the **** and to the victors go the spoils of war!!!!
 

Skans » 08 Feb 2024, 7:09 am » wrote: ↑

08 Feb 2024, 7:09 am

In a civil war, we get to slaughter the **** that now inhabit that region of california.  So, I opt for civil war.  F- a friendly divorce.  Let the war begin, slaughter the **** and to the victors go the spoils of war!!!!

All the trannies you can rape, huh? Sick bastard.

Punch » 08 Feb 2024, 11:15 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Feb 2024, 11:15 pm

All the trannies you can rape, huh? Sick bastard.

You're weird.  I never mentioned anything about "trannies" or "rape".  That sick **** came straight from your own mind.