Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
A Saloshn Tuh Da Konstatoooshanl Konundrm...
A Saloshn Tuh Da Konstatoooshanl Konundrm...
By R. Suave
8 Feb 2024 8:03 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
8 Feb 2024 8:03 am
The Supreme Court may be wary of disqualifying Trump based solely on their own ruling as a group of unelected judges. But they do not have to do so. They can ground their ruling in the determination that Congress has already made, thus giving their decision both legal and political legitimacy. The Constitution is clear, Congress’ votes are clear and Trump’s disqualification is thus wholly justified. If some people disagree, they can push for Congress to reinstate Trump as provided by the Constitution.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/08/opinions ... index.html
sounds origanilis and tekstuwhatevah tuh me...I feelz.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/08/opinions ... index.html
sounds origanilis and tekstuwhatevah tuh me...I feelz.
8 Feb 2024 8:19 am
8 Feb 2024 8:37 am
Another whine by from someone too ashamed to name their sources....
Zzzzz
8 Feb 2024 8:44 am
I'll name them when it's important to the conversation (and I can remember/find them). It's not my fault you're a baby.R.Suave » 08 Feb 2024, 9:37 am » wrote: ↑ Another whine by from someone too ashamed to name their sources....
Zzzzz
I will also state my thoughts and opinions for the record. You, not so much.
8 Feb 2024 9:05 am
No....when you're asked.ConsRule » 08 Feb 2024, 9:44 am » wrote: ↑ I'll name them when it's important to the conversation (and I can remember/find them). It's not my fault you're a baby.
I will also state my thoughts and opinions for the record. You, not so much.
Unless you're putting them out there for my review keep your bitching to yourself, child.
8 Feb 2024 9:09 am
R.Suave » 08 Feb 2024, 9:03 am » wrote: ↑ The Supreme Court may be wary of disqualifying Trump based solely on their own ruling as a group of unelected judges. But they do not have to do so. They can ground their ruling in the determination that Congress has already made, thus giving their decision both legal and political legitimacy. The Constitution is clear, Congress’ votes are clear and Trump’s disqualification is thus wholly justified. If some people disagree, they can push for Congress to reinstate Trump as provided by the Constitution.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/08/opinions ... index.html
sounds origanilis and tekstuwhatevah tuh me...I feelz.
No thoughts, etc...copy/paste.
TDS. Media comment justified.
CNN:
Retarded Horse's view on women.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
- I LOVE IT WHEN A CRACK WHORE GETS BEAT UP Image
- I WANT TO WATCH YOU BEAT YOUR CRACK WHORE WIFE Image Image Image
- PUT THAT WIFE BEATER ON AND GET BUSY
8 Feb 2024 9:14 am
This may come as a emotional shock to your system...but I don't have to do what you want or ask.R.Suave » 08 Feb 2024, 10:05 am » wrote: ↑ No....when you're asked.
Unless you're putting them out there for my review keep your bitching to yourself, child.
You'll take what you get and like it...or go **** yourself...whichever you choose.
8 Feb 2024 9:30 am
I understand.ConsRule » 08 Feb 2024, 10:14 am » wrote: ↑ This may come as a emotional shock to your system...but I don't have to do what you want or ask.
You'll take what you get and like it...or go **** yourself...whichever you choose.
Being a child, you insist your fee-fees must matter.
Having no balls, you want to do so from under your mama's skirt.
8 Feb 2024 9:52 am
<<<yawn>>>R.Suave » 08 Feb 2024, 10:30 am » wrote: ↑I understand.
Being a child, you insist your fee-fees must matter.
Having no balls, you want to do so from under your mama's skirt.
8 Feb 2024 10:45 am
That is Rico's specialty.
That and his phonetic spelling **** that makes absolutely no sense to anyone but himself.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
8 Feb 2024 10:48 am
Sounds tuh me like they think they got him now...R.Suave » 08 Feb 2024, 9:03 am » wrote: ↑ The Supreme Court may be wary of disqualifying Trump based solely on their own ruling as a group of unelected judges. But they do not have to do so. They can ground their ruling in the determination that Congress has already made, thus giving their decision both legal and political legitimacy. The Constitution is clear, Congress’ votes are clear and Trump’s disqualification is thus wholly justified. If some people disagree, they can push for Congress to reinstate Trump as provided by the Constitution.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/08/opinions ... index.html
sounds origanilis and tekstuwhatevah tuh me...I feelz.
In memory of Pumpkins
8 Feb 2024 10:50 am
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
8 Feb 2024 10:56 am
You're gonna lose this one bigly.R.Suave » 08 Feb 2024, 9:03 am » wrote: ↑ The Supreme Court may be wary of disqualifying Trump based solely on their own ruling as a group of unelected judges. But they do not have to do so. They can ground their ruling in the determination that Congress has already made, thus giving their decision both legal and political legitimacy. The Constitution is clear, Congress’ votes are clear and Trump’s disqualification is thus wholly justified. If some people disagree, they can push for Congress to reinstate Trump as provided by the Constitution.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/08/opinions ... index.html
sounds origanilis and tekstuwhatevah tuh me...I feelz.
**chuckle**
8 Feb 2024 11:08 am
I don't think you even have the liberal justices on your side, this is embarrassing.R.Suave » 08 Feb 2024, 9:03 am » wrote: ↑ The Supreme Court may be wary of disqualifying Trump based solely on their own ruling as a group of unelected judges. But they do not have to do so. They can ground their ruling in the determination that Congress has already made, thus giving their decision both legal and political legitimacy. The Constitution is clear, Congress’ votes are clear and Trump’s disqualification is thus wholly justified. If some people disagree, they can push for Congress to reinstate Trump as provided by the Constitution.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/08/opinions ... index.html
sounds origanilis and tekstuwhatevah tuh me...I feelz.
8 Feb 2024 11:13 am
You miss the point.
SCOTUS has to come up with a reason to grant the appeal. There are no easy routes.
That it will come up with something is very likely.
A sound contrarian bet is that Sammy Alito's sponsors tell him to cut Grifty loose because he is no longer useful.
8 Feb 2024 11:14 am
You think a lot of ****.Cedar » 08 Feb 2024, 12:08 pm » wrote: ↑ I don't think you even have the liberal justices on your side, this is embarrassing.
I pay it no heed.
8 Feb 2024 11:18 am
Are you listening to it?
8 Feb 2024 11:33 am
No...
I will read it.
8 Feb 2024 11:38 am
And so it begins...R.Suave » 08 Feb 2024, 12:13 pm » wrote: ↑ You miss the point.
SCOTUS has to come up with a reason to grant the appeal. There are no easy routes.
That it will come up with something is very likely.
A sound contrarian bet is that Sammy Alito's sponsors tell him to cut Grifty loose because he is no longer useful.
History of 14th amendment: Chief Justice John Roberts suggested one of the main arguments Murray raised was “at war” with the history of the 14th Amendment’s insurrectionist ban at center in the case.“The whole point of the 14th Amendment was to restrict state power,” Roberts said. “On the other hand, it augmented federal power.”
https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/ ... index.html
This court may become famous for federalizing elections.
8 Feb 2024 11:41 am
R.Suave » 08 Feb 2024, 9:03 am » wrote: ↑ The Supreme Court may be wary of disqualifying Trump based solely on their own ruling as a group of unelected judges. But they do not have to do so. They can ground their ruling in the determination that Congress has already made, thus giving their decision both legal and political legitimacy. The Constitution is clear, Congress’ votes are clear and Trump’s disqualification is thus wholly justified. If some people disagree, they can push for Congress to reinstate Trump as provided by the Constitution.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/08/opinions ... index.html
sounds origanilis and tekstuwhatevah tuh me...I feelz.
CNNLOL SAYS link again...the Russia Russia Russia network
Who is online
In total there are 3109 users online :: 11 registered, 14 bots, and 3084 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, Blackvegetable, Buck Naked, ROG62, RebelGator, jerra b, SouthernFried, Cannonpointer, Deezer Shoove, nefarious101, Fuelman
Bots: MQQBrowser, DuckDuckGo, YandexBot, proximic, DuckDuckBot, CensysInspect, ADmantX, CriteoBot, Mediapartners-Google, curl/7, Googlebot, bingbot, facebookexternalhit, Applebot