Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
maineBITCH will be pissed. TRUMP will be on ballot on ALL 50 States. 9-0 SCOTUS RULING
maineBITCH will be pissed. TRUMP will be on ballot on ALL 50 States. 9-0 SCOTUS RULING
By Beekeeper
8 Feb 2024 12:19 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
8 Feb 2024 12:19 pm
Let the WHINING and gnashing of teeth begin!!
The SCOTUS will rule, 9-0, that the STATES do NOT have the authority to remove Trump from ANY ballot.
Even Maine will NOT be able to prevent it @maineman !!!
ONLY Congress has the AUTHORITY UNDER SECTION 5 of the 14th Amendment to determine is someone was involved in an "insurrection" and can be removed from the ballot!!
Even the LWNJ justices agreed today!!
The SCOTUS will rule, 9-0, that the STATES do NOT have the authority to remove Trump from ANY ballot.
Even Maine will NOT be able to prevent it @maineman !!!
ONLY Congress has the AUTHORITY UNDER SECTION 5 of the 14th Amendment to determine is someone was involved in an "insurrection" and can be removed from the ballot!!
Even the LWNJ justices agreed today!!
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
8 Feb 2024 12:41 pm
It's nice to know that I live rent-free inside the apiarist's head. I don't visit there very often, however, as empty and cavernous as it may be up there... I have the fool on ignore and will continue to do so.
But while I am here - I can't ignore the list of thread names- I will say that I never gave this case much chance, especially if it were framed as an all-or-nothing sort of case where the SCOTUS ruling would apply to all states. I do hope they go 9-0 on the verdict. It will make it that much easier for them to rule against the clown on the Presidential Immunity case coming up soon. I'd much rather have Joe running against a convicted felon in all 50 states than let him skate on his criminal activity and only get banned in states where he didn't have a prayer to begin with.
But while I am here - I can't ignore the list of thread names- I will say that I never gave this case much chance, especially if it were framed as an all-or-nothing sort of case where the SCOTUS ruling would apply to all states. I do hope they go 9-0 on the verdict. It will make it that much easier for them to rule against the clown on the Presidential Immunity case coming up soon. I'd much rather have Joe running against a convicted felon in all 50 states than let him skate on his criminal activity and only get banned in states where he didn't have a prayer to begin with.
8 Feb 2024 1:00 pm
Poor thing. I kicked his *** massively and now he HIDES LIKE THE ****** COWARD PIECE OF **** she is!!!maineman » 08 Feb 2024, 1:41 pm » wrote: ↑ It's nice to know that I live rent-free inside the apiarist's head. I don't visit there very often, however, as empty and cavernous as it may be up there... I have the fool on ignore and will continue to do so.
But while I am here - I can't ignore the list of thread names- I will say that I never gave this case much chance, especially if it were framed as an all-or-nothing sort of case where the SCOTUS ruling would apply to all states. I do hope they go 9-0 on the verdict. It will make it that much easier for them to rule against the clown on the Presidential Immunity case coming up soon. I'd much rather have Joe running against a convicted felon in all 50 states than let him skate on his criminal activity and only get banned in states where he didn't have a prayer to begin with.
RUN COWARD, RUN!!!
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
8 Feb 2024 1:03 pm
Oh man. @R. Suave is going to go ape ****.
I am talking TDS level 10 ape ****.
I am talking TDS level 10 ape ****.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
8 Feb 2024 1:04 pm
"I never gave this case much chance..'maineman » 08 Feb 2024, 1:41 pm » wrote: ↑ It's nice to know that I live rent-free inside the apiarist's head. I don't visit there very often, however, as empty and cavernous as it may be up there... I have the fool on ignore and will continue to do so.
But while I am here - I can't ignore the list of thread names- I will say that I never gave this case much chance, especially if it were framed as an all-or-nothing sort of case where the SCOTUS ruling would apply to all states. I do hope they go 9-0 on the verdict. It will make it that much easier for them to rule against the clown on the Presidential Immunity case coming up soon. I'd much rather have Joe running against a convicted felon in all 50 states than let him skate on his criminal activity and only get banned in states where he didn't have a prayer to begin with.
Remarkable
You celebrated the decision at the time ..
What a waste..
Really .
8 Feb 2024 1:18 pm
That is called a bad case of the sour grapes Boo.BooRadley » 08 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm » wrote: ↑ "I never gave this case much chance..'
Remarkable
You celebrated the decision at the time ..
What a waste..
Really .
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
8 Feb 2024 1:36 pm
RedheadedStranger » 08 Feb 2024, 2:18 pm » wrote: ↑ That is called a bad case of the sour grapes Boo.
More like a bad case of the dumb ***.
8 Feb 2024 1:39 pm
8 Feb 2024 1:53 pm
Maybe he just mis-spoke.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
8 Feb 2024 1:59 pm
Now that's funny
8 Feb 2024 2:11 pm
Man,
Talk about some Political Merch that will sell like Hotcakes..... A T-Shirt with a 2024 Ballot on the Front from Maine with Trump's name on it --- and a 2024 Ballot with Trump's Name from Colorado on the Back.....
Talk about some Political Merch that will sell like Hotcakes..... A T-Shirt with a 2024 Ballot on the Front from Maine with Trump's name on it --- and a 2024 Ballot with Trump's Name from Colorado on the Back.....
8 Feb 2024 2:14 pm
My God...Kobia2 » 08 Feb 2024, 3:11 pm » wrote: ↑ Man,
Talk about some Political Mech that will sell like Hotcakes..... A T-Shirt with a 2024 Ballot on the Front from Maine with Trump's name on it --- and a 2024 Ballot with Trump's Name from Colorado on the Back.....
I love that idea...
Really
8 Feb 2024 2:29 pm
8 Feb 2024 2:35 pm
No, she won't. It's going to be a 9-0 decision with the impetus being that only Congress can determine the eligibility of a candidate under the 14th Amendment. As that is what the 5th section of the 14th says- Congress has the power to legislate this article. There is no leeway on that and even ol Sotomeyor has to agree on that one.Warcok » 08 Feb 2024, 3:29 pm » wrote: ↑ Sonia Sotomayor will be the lone descendant, my sources familiar with the situation tell me
AND it may include that there is no single standard under the Constitution for any State to use as some States said no insurrection, and others thought there was. And that Congress has set no legal definition or standard for ANY State to use.
@maineman is going to get BITCH SLAPPED MASSIVELY when that ruling comes down!!
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
8 Feb 2024 3:04 pm
Beekeeper » 08 Feb 2024, 3:35 pm » wrote: ↑ No, she won't. It's going to be a 9-0 decision with the impetus being that only Congress can determine the eligibility of a candidate under the 14th Amendment. As that is what the 5th section of the 14th says- Congress has the power to legislate this article. There is no leeway on that and even ol Sotomeyor has to agree on that one.
AND it may include that there is no single standard under the Constitution for any State to use as some States said no insurrection, and others thought there was. And that Congress has set no legal definition or standard for ANY State to use.
@maineman is going to get BITCH SLAPPED MASSIVELY when that ruling comes down!!
8-1 the Mexican will be the dissent
8 Feb 2024 3:07 pm
Racist...
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
8 Feb 2024 5:13 pm
What a bunch of BSmaineman » 08 Feb 2024, 1:41 pm » wrote: ↑ It's nice to know that I live rent-free inside the apiarist's head. I don't visit there very often, however, as empty and cavernous as it may be up there... I have the fool on ignore and will continue to do so.
But while I am here - I can't ignore the list of thread names- I will say that I never gave this case much chance, especially if it were framed as an all-or-nothing sort of case where the SCOTUS ruling would apply to all states. I do hope they go 9-0 on the verdict. It will make it that much easier for them to rule against the clown on the Presidential Immunity case coming up soon. I'd much rather have Joe running against a convicted felon in all 50 states than let him skate on his criminal activity and only get banned in states where he didn't have a prayer to begin with.
You hope they go 9-0?
No you don't..
You're hoping that he's kicked off the ballot...
8 Feb 2024 5:17 pm
We love how you care about democracy..maineman » 08 Feb 2024, 1:41 pm » wrote: ↑ It's nice to know that I live rent-free inside the apiarist's head. I don't visit there very often, however, as empty and cavernous as it may be up there... I have the fool on ignore and will continue to do so.
But while I am here - I can't ignore the list of thread names- I will say that I never gave this case much chance, especially if it were framed as an all-or-nothing sort of case where the SCOTUS ruling would apply to all states. I do hope they go 9-0 on the verdict. It will make it that much easier for them to rule against the clown on the Presidential Immunity case coming up soon. I'd much rather have Joe running against a convicted felon in all 50 states than let him skate on his criminal activity and only get banned in states where he didn't have a prayer to begin with.
8 Feb 2024 5:39 pm
"I will say that I never gave this case much chance"maineman » 08 Feb 2024, 1:41 pm » wrote: ↑ It's nice to know that I live rent-free inside the apiarist's head. I don't visit there very often, however, as empty and cavernous as it may be up there... I have the fool on ignore and will continue to do so.
But while I am here - I can't ignore the list of thread names- I will say that I never gave this case much chance, especially if it were framed as an all-or-nothing sort of case where the SCOTUS ruling would apply to all states. I do hope they go 9-0 on the verdict. It will make it that much easier for them to rule against the clown on the Presidential Immunity case coming up soon. I'd much rather have Joe running against a convicted felon in all 50 states than let him skate on his criminal activity and only get banned in states where he didn't have a prayer to begin with.
Yeah but when your Sec of State took Trump off the ballot you priased her and said "Sheena is doing a great job"...
She's doing a great job but at the same time you're saying her decision doesn't stand much of a chance?
Why not...."This has no chance and she's wasting time and resources"....???
8 Feb 2024 5:43 pm
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom 
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..." Who is online
In total there are 3109 users online :: 11 registered, 14 bots, and 3084 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, Blackvegetable, Buck Naked, ROG62, RebelGator, jerra b, SouthernFried, Cannonpointer, Deezer Shoove, nefarious101, Fuelman
Bots: MQQBrowser, DuckDuckGo, YandexBot, proximic, DuckDuckBot, CensysInspect, ADmantX, CriteoBot, Mediapartners-Google, curl/7, Googlebot, bingbot, facebookexternalhit, Applebot