Hahahaha!maineman » 08 Feb 2024, 1:41 pm » wrote: ↑ It's nice to know that I live rent-free inside the apiarist's head. I don't visit there very often, however, as empty and cavernous as it may be up there... I have the fool on ignore and will continue to do so.
But while I am here - I can't ignore the list of thread names- I will say that I never gave this case much chance, especially if it were framed as an all-or-nothing sort of case where the SCOTUS ruling would apply to all states. I do hope they go 9-0 on the verdict. It will make it that much easier for them to rule against the clown on the Presidential Immunity case coming up soon. I'd much rather have Joe running against a convicted felon in all 50 states than let him skate on his criminal activity and only get banned in states where he didn't have a prayer to begin with.
The U.S. Supreme Court has overturned the constitutional right to an abortion, reversing Roe v. WadeSquatchman » 08 Feb 2024, 7:51 pm » wrote: ↑ It doesn't make sense for it to be anything other than a 9 to 0 ruling.
I'm fine with it.
Democracy in action.
He is in to bees - not apes.maineman » 08 Feb 2024, 1:41 pm » wrote: ↑ It's nice to know that I live rent-free inside the apiarist's head. I don't visit there very often, however, as empty and cavernous as it may be up there... I have the fool on ignore and will continue to do so.
Newsflash, kid. Brandon isn't running. He just looks like he's running, as part of a long con on stupid democrat voters.maineman » 08 Feb 2024, 1:41 pm » wrote: ↑ But while I am here - I can't ignore the list of thread names- I will say that I never gave this case much chance, especially if it were framed as an all-or-nothing sort of case where the SCOTUS ruling would apply to all states. I do hope they go 9-0 on the verdict. It will make it that much easier for them to rule against the clown on the Presidential Immunity case coming up soon. I'd much rather have Joe running against a convicted felon in all 50 states than let him skate on his criminal activity and only get banned in states where he didn't have a prayer to begin with.
Bee ****.Vegas » 08 Feb 2024, 2:03 pm » wrote: ↑ Oh man. @R. Suave is going to go ape ****.
I am talking TDS level 10 ape ****.
He's an ape.Beekeeper » 08 Feb 2024, 3:35 pm » wrote: ↑ No, she won't. It's going to be a 9-0 decision with the impetus being that only Congress can determine the eligibility of a candidate under the 14th Amendment. As that is what the 5th section of the 14th says- Congress has the power to legislate this article. There is no leeway on that and even ol Sotomeyor has to agree on that one.
AND it may include that there is no single standard under the Constitution for any State to use as some States said no insurrection, and others thought there was. And that Congress has set no legal definition or standard for ANY State to use.
@maineman is going to get BITCH SLAPPED MASSIVELY when that ruling comes down!!
They're not sending their best Justices.
It veritably drips from him, his love of the Constitution to which he swore an oath.
We have no democracy. If we had a democracy, our local mayors' decisions would have a greater effect on our lives than what some far removed, foreign jurisdiction gets up to. If we had a democracy, the people we elect would do the things we elected them to do - instead of the precise opposite. If we had a democracy, the federal government would serve the various states - not master them. If we had a democracy, the greatest share of our taxes would fund our local government DIRECTLY, rather than going to washington, being loaded down with strings, and then sent back - brutally pinched.Squatchman » 08 Feb 2024, 7:51 pm » wrote: ↑ It doesn't make sense for it to be anything other than a 9 to 0 ruling.
I'm fine with it.
Democracy in action.
You know it's not fair to hold mainbitch, or any liberal, responsible for what they said yesterday.BooRadley » 08 Feb 2024, 6:39 pm » wrote: ↑ "I will say that I never gave this case much chance"
Yeah but when your Sec of State took Trump off the ballot you priased her and said "Sheena is doing a great job"...
She's doing a great job but at the same time you're saying her decision doesn't stand much of a chance?
Why not...."This has no chance and she's wasting time and resources"....???
I see what you did there