Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
What would Reagan think of Trump?
What would Reagan think of Trump?
By Monderegal
12 Feb 2024 6:53 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
13 Feb 2024 5:38 pm
will you ever accept the effects your cause caused throughout history so far?
Because when Ronald used there instead of hear, he was in on the misdirection by all side of humanity playing same optical illusions living exceeds adapting as displaced.
13 Feb 2024 5:40 pm
You cannot say "here" as the events take place. always out there beyond total sum reached evolving became here now.
13 Feb 2024 5:41 pm
So join soleNostradamus'omh » 13 Feb 2024, 6:38 pm » wrote: ↑ will you ever accept the effects your cause caused throughout history so far?
13 Feb 2024 5:44 pm
I quit joining self deceiving ideologies 42 years ago, but I still obey rule of law because reality doesn't give any other options except self destruction which is taking place anyway ignoring how living is physically balancing genetic results as eternally separated here now.
why I became apathetic and lethargic while still being completely empathic instinctively aware of how intellect motivates brains to mind suggestions life isn't self evident philosophically, psychologically, physically punishing anyone resisting what people choose to believe possible.
13 Feb 2024 5:46 pm
Well they do have some navel assets in Syria and some air forces and missile bases there too. They could probably wage an air campaign but without ground forces the worst they could do is some hardware damage. Probably not worth it for Russia. Most of those assets are to prompt up Assad and squeeze some favoritism in the region. I think the last thing Putin would do is strike Israel over some sort of human rights designation when he's using his resources in his backyard for the glory of Russia. The international order and law is more of a Western thing. Zoom in on Syria if you want to see the military that Russia has in the region.jerrab » 13 Feb 2024, 6:04 pm » wrote: ↑ they could go thru another country in the area. us and israel better stop this ****.
https://youtu.be/9-gHMEaKtCs?si=S8BjrzGJe__e8MsL
https://gfsis.org.ge/maps/russian-military-forces
Nothing is easier than defending the status quo.
13 Feb 2024 5:49 pm
Skans » 13 Feb 2024, 5:09 pm » wrote: ↑ Maineman, fair is fair. If the European Nations fail to fund NATO, then we reduce our funding accordingly. Why would even Democrats want Europe to abuse our hard earned American tax dollars like that?
The sad thing is when Trump got more funding from NATO members in his term, he also increased AMERICAN funding for NATO. Kinda defeats the purpose.
Nothing is easier than defending the status quo.
13 Feb 2024 5:49 pm
13 Feb 2024 5:51 pm
Monderegal » 13 Feb 2024, 6:46 pm » wrote: ↑ Well they do have some navel assets in Syria and some air forces and missile bases there too. They could probably wage an air campaign but without ground forces the worst they could do is some hardware damage. Probably not worth it for Russia. Most of those assets are to prompt up Assad and squeeze some favoritism in the region. I think the last thing Putin would do is strike Israel over some sort of human rights designation when he's using his resources in his backyard for the glory of Russia. The international order and law is more of a Western thing. Zoom in on Syria if you want to see the military that Russia has in the region.
https://gfsis.org.ge/maps/russian-military-forces
ukraine rfeuses to have peace negotiations
13 Feb 2024 5:51 pm
Nostradamus'omh » 13 Feb 2024, 6:40 pm » wrote: ↑ You cannot say "here" as the events take place. always out there beyond total sum reached evolving became here now.
Stop it sole, you are embarrassing yourself
You have said yourself
"Now is eternity"
We are always here now
13 Feb 2024 5:54 pm
No I am not embarrassed at all. I don't carry social guilt anymore. I am the only one not denying how evolving is self evident genetics has always been eternally separating ancestral positions since inception of ancestral lineages here today.Mrkelly » 13 Feb 2024, 6:51 pm » wrote: ↑ Stop it sole, you are embarrassing yourself
You have said yourself
"Now is eternity"
We are always here now
Your have true doesn't include time separated conceive to decomposed so far population never same numbers again every ancestor does or doesn't become 1 of 2 parents, 1 of 4 grandparents, 1 of 8 great grandparents, 1 of 16 great great grandparents and sibling of each generation gap that didn't reproduce or outlived their reproductions.
13 Feb 2024 5:54 pm
I answered your question
Go away troll 🧌
13 Feb 2024 5:56 pm
No, you did not answer.
13 Feb 2024 6:01 pm
Incomplete is never entirely accurate. truth is relative to what people believe without being completely accurate about understanding life living in plain sight as one unique result from the rest equally sharing space now.
13 Feb 2024 6:04 pm
13 Feb 2024 6:08 pm
Why not?
13 Feb 2024 6:32 pm
Monderegal » 13 Feb 2024, 6:46 pm » wrote: ↑ Well they do have some navel assets in Syria and some air forces and missile bases there too. They could probably wage an air campaign but without ground forces the worst they could do is some hardware damage. Probably not worth it for Russia. Most of those assets are to prompt up Assad and squeeze some favoritism in the region. I think the last thing Putin would do is strike Israel over some sort of human rights designation when he's using his resources in his backyard for the glory of Russia. The international order and law is more of a Western thing. Zoom in on Syria if you want to see the military that Russia has in the region.
https://gfsis.org.ge/maps/russian-military-forces
zelenski vowed for fight russia to get crimea back and that he wanted to join nato- putting nato in russia's backyard, a very real threat for russia.
13 Feb 2024 6:43 pm
People don't **** get itjerrab » 13 Feb 2024, 7:32 pm » wrote: ↑ zelenski vowed for fight russia to get crimea back and that he wanted to join nato- putting nato in russia's backyard, a very real threat for russia.
Never will
https://youtu.be/ATJJaCaWLZw?si=GEJBYo0sg5C7JOno
13 Feb 2024 6:51 pm
Trump would in no shape or form support Russian aggression on any nation, let alone a NATO nation. That's just not Trump. That is pure Democrat false narratives about Trump.maineman » 13 Feb 2024, 5:35 pm » wrote: ↑ Why would republicans continue to support a candidate who advocates one of our century-old villains attacking our allies?
Face it: he really could shoot someone in the middle of fifth avenue and you'd still vote for him.
13 Feb 2024 6:53 pm
Not at all. Like I said, fair is fair. Getting NATO nations to be invested in their own defense is important. And, Trump made it happen. It just goes to prove that Trump has never been anti-NATO. What Trump is is pro-fairness, especially in how we are treated by other nations that are supposed to be our allies.Monderegal » 13 Feb 2024, 6:49 pm » wrote: ↑ The sad thing is when Trump got more funding from NATO members in his term, he also increased AMERICAN funding for NATO. Kinda defeats the purpose.
13 Feb 2024 6:59 pm
Skans » 13 Feb 2024, 7:51 pm » wrote: ↑ Trump would in no shape or form support Russian aggression on any nation, let alone a NATO nation. That's just not Trump. That is pure Democrat false narratives about Trump.
They are his exact words.
Who is online
In total there are 6300 users online :: 2 registered, 14 bots, and 6284 guests
Registered users: SouthernFried, Cannonpointer
Bots: proximic, DuckDuckBot, Mojeek, Bolt, YandexBot, ADmantX, facebookexternalhit, CriteoBot, Mediapartners-Google, bingbot, curl/7, MicroMessenger, Applebot, Googlebot