Now mainbitch is claiming he watches Hannity.maineman » 15 Feb 2024, 8:17 pm » wrote: ↑ damn.... how many times did Hannity claim that this guy was THE story that tied the whole Hunter investigation together?
From the CNN story...maineman » 15 Feb 2024, 8:17 pm » wrote: ↑ https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/15/politics ... index.html
damn.... how many times did Hannity claim that this guy was THE story that tied the whole Hunter investigation together?
What now, MAGA morons? @RebelGator claims something called the Red Binder is gonna be the new thing.
I'm gonna have to lay in a stock of popcorn... this is getting fun!
golfboy » 15 Feb 2024, 8:23 pm » wrote: ↑ Now mainbitch is claiming he watches Hannity.![]()
I'll bet he just "knows" that Hannity talked to this guy, like he knows the facts presented in 2000 Mules.
What exactly did you think Biden's FBI was going to do?maineman » 15 Feb 2024, 8:17 pm » wrote: ↑ https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/15/politics ... index.html
damn.... how many times did Hannity claim that this guy was THE story that tied the whole Hunter investigation together?
What now, MAGA morons? @RebelGator claims something called the Red Binder is gonna be the new thing.
I'm gonna have to lay in a stock of popcorn... this is getting fun!
Did you, or did you not ask " how many times did Hannity claim that this guy was THE story that tied the whole Hunter investigation together?"maineman » 15 Feb 2024, 8:32 pm » wrote: ↑ Where, in my post, do I EVER claim that I "watched" Hannity? Seriously. The whole of your understanding of the English Language could fit into a coffee cup, and there'd still be room for a cup of coffee.
RebelGator » 15 Feb 2024, 8:33 pm » wrote: ↑ What exactly did you think Biden's FBI was going to do?
Who's gonna step up and claim that Joe really didn't say that he and Obama bribed the Ukrainian President to fire the investigator looking into the corruption?
Well, son of a bitch, they fired the guy.....that ring a bell in your partisan ears?
golfboy » 15 Feb 2024, 8:36 pm » wrote: ↑ Did you, or did you not ask " how many times did Hannity claim that this guy was THE story that tied the whole Hunter investigation together?"
Or did you just assume this happened?
What do you do, close your eyes and just listen to his TV show?maineman » 15 Feb 2024, 8:42 pm » wrote: ↑ is the word "watched" in my post? Y/N?
I watched several different film clips of Hannity saying that this informant's story was the most damning thing in the Hunter investigation. I also listened to a report that Hannity had brought up that investigator 83 times in monologs during 2023.
I don't assume anything.
I do know, without a doubt, that you are an idiot.
golfboy » 15 Feb 2024, 8:51 pm » wrote: ↑ What do you do, close your eyes and just listen to his TV show?
lol. Let me guess... msLSD.maineman » 15 Feb 2024, 9:11 pm » wrote: ↑ I watched another TV show that was chronicling Hannity's obsession with the FBI informant. On that show, there were several clips of Hannity speaking and they all said basically the same thing. And the host of that show indicated that his staff had found 83 instances of Hannity talking about that informant during CY2023.
I can't make it any plainer than that. Well... I guess I could rework it so that no word was more than two syllables. Would that be helpful for you? In advance, I gotta say "Hannity" is gonna be problematic if that's the way you want to go...
You also spent half your life here and the other site discussing pee tapes and Russian Collusion...maineman » 15 Feb 2024, 9:11 pm » wrote: ↑ I watched another TV show that was chronicling Hannity's obsession with the FBI informant. On that show, there were several clips of Hannity speaking and they all said basically the same thing. And the host of that show indicated that his staff had found 83 instances of Hannity talking about that informant during CY2023.
I can't make it any plainer than that. Well... I guess I could rework it so that no word was more than two syllables. Would that be helpful for you? In advance, I gotta say "Hannity" is gonna be problematic if that's the way you want to go...
RebelGator » 15 Feb 2024, 8:33 pm » wrote: ↑ What exactly did you think Biden's FBI was going to do?
Who's gonna step up and claim that Joe really didn't say that he and Obama bribed the Ukrainian President to fire the investigator looking into the corruption?
Well, son of a bitch, they fired the guy.....that ring a bell in your partisan ears?

JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Don't believe his denials, he has a long history of lying that's been chronicled many times on the forum.golfboy » 15 Feb 2024, 8:51 pm » wrote: ↑ What do you do, close your eyes and just listen to his TV show?
Wasn't his accuser part of the process the biden family was doing? He lost his immunity deal. This is all a smoke screen line of ****.maineman » 15 Feb 2024, 8:17 pm » wrote: ↑ https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/15/politics ... index.html
damn.... how many times did Hannity claim that this guy was THE story that tied the whole Hunter investigation together?
What now, MAGA morons? @RebelGator claims something called the Red Binder is gonna be the new thing.
I'm gonna have to lay in a stock of popcorn... this is getting fun! :rofl:
A consortium of thieves is your final answer?maineman » 15 Feb 2024, 8:38 pm » wrote: ↑ the indictment claims that the informant made it all up.
Joe and Obama pressured the Ukrainian President to fire a corrupt prosecutor and that move had the full support of the European Union and the IMF.
maineman » 15 Feb 2024, 8:38 pm » wrote: ↑ the indictment claims that the informant made it all up.
Joe and Obama pressured the Ukrainian President to fire a corrupt prosecutor and that move had the full support of the European Union and the IMF.