Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
MARINE COLONEL TARNISHES TIN EAGLES WITH FALSE TESTIMONY...Lies about the effectiveness of 5.56/.223
MARINE COLONEL TARNISHES TIN EAGLES WITH FALSE TESTIMONY...Lies about the effectiveness of 5.56/.223
By Huey
19 Feb 2024 11:29 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
20 Feb 2024 2:11 pm
No case.Huey » 20 Feb 2024, 3:00 pm » wrote: ↑ Nah. More relevance to the OP. You are really proving you are clueless on the issue of firearms and ammunition.
You are really proving you are clueless on the issue of firearms and ammunition.
You're clear on that body armor thing now, right?
20 Feb 2024 2:22 pm
R.Suave » 20 Feb 2024, 3:11 pm » wrote: ↑ No case.
You're clear on that body armor thing now, right?
I never was in doubt about it. Regardless, nothing posted shows that the single 5.56/.223 can sever the top of the body from the lower body or decapitate someone.
Which is the lie the Colonel told.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
20 Feb 2024 3:08 pm
I didn't even try it...GHETTOBLASTER » 20 Feb 2024, 2:08 pm » wrote: ↑ Did you get the same search result...?
[It would be kind of creepy if it was just me who did....]
Please seat yourself.
I like the very things you hate.
I like the very things you hate.
20 Feb 2024 3:48 pm
You clearly were....until I told you about it.Huey » 20 Feb 2024, 3:22 pm » wrote: ↑ I never was in doubt about it. Regardless, nothing posted shows that the single 5.56/.223 can sever the top of the body from the lower body or decapitate someone.
Which is the lie the Colonel told.
Take it up the Colonel...I'm sure he'll defer to your raghead head count.Which is the lie the Colonel told.
20 Feb 2024 7:43 pm
.223/5.56
.22
The same size.
You can shoot .22lr. through an AR 15 barrel.
They have conversion kits.
20 Feb 2024 7:46 pm
Mine are loaded with 62 gr jacketed soft point deer hunting rounds for self defense.Skans » 19 Feb 2024, 5:05 pm » wrote: ↑ The problem with the military's 5.56 round has more to do with it being jacketed ball ammo, or even steel core ammo as opposed to a hollow point expanding round. Unless it hits bone or vital organs, it's basically going straight through in a lot of instances. So, yes, when it goes straight through, it only wounds.
20 Feb 2024 7:52 pm
The muskets that the framers protected from government gun grabs when they wrote the second amendment, these were mostly 75 caliber, yes?Huey » 19 Feb 2024, 12:29 pm » wrote: ↑ Sounds like this guy sold his integrity....He is paid $200 bucks an hour as a court expert.
Colonel Tucker qualified MSRs as “assault weapons” based on California’s list of cosmetic characteristics that have nothing to do whatsoever with the rifle’s actual functions. He testifies that the selector switch that renders an M-4 capable of automatic fire is a “picayune” or “petty or worthless” difference. By that definition, Colonel Tucker would classify any semiautomatic firearm as a “weapon of war.”
But he goes further.
“A single round is capable of severing the upper body from the lower body, or decapitation. The round is designed to kill, not wound,
And were they primarily designed to wound elk, or kill elk? And are elk much larger than humans?
I think it's time for you to accept that your homosexual/trangender military is no longer apolitical and no longer worthy of respect. It ain't the colonel, son. It's the **** he was packed in.Huey » 19 Feb 2024, 12:29 pm » wrote: ↑I’m not doubting the colonel’s combat acumen. I certainly can’t say that’s what I saw in combat. I never witnessed a single 5.56mm round fired at the enemy decapitate or sever a human body in half. If this were true of the 5.56mm cartridge, it would beg the question why the military is spending millions to move to the 6.8mm Next Generation Squad Weapon, using a heavier caliber that carries more kinetic energy downrange. It would also beg the question of why the military also uses 7.62x51mm, .300 Winchester Magnum, .338 Lapua Magnum and .50 BMG caliber ammunition. If the 5.56mm cartridge were that devastating, there would clearly be no additional need for heavier bullets with more gunpowder behind them.
I’ve killed coyotes and prairie dogs with both 5.56mm and .223 Remington. Nothing of what Colonel Tucker describes ever happened on these much smaller targets. In fact, in my home state, the .223/5.56mm cartridge isn’t considered powerful enough for an ethical harvest of whitetail deer.
https://www.nssf.org/articles/marine-co ... testimony/
I have also shot live targets. The Colonel is full of ****.
@R. Suave is there where you get you info from?
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
20 Feb 2024 8:13 pm
But they are designed to wound, yes? Not to kill, fer pete's sake...Squatchman » 20 Feb 2024, 8:46 pm » wrote: ↑ Mine are loaded with 62 gr jacketed soft point deer hunting rounds for self defense.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
20 Feb 2024 8:21 pm
Squatchman » 20 Feb 2024, 8:43 pm » wrote: ↑ .223/5.56
.22
The same size.
You can shoot .22lr. through an AR 15 barrel.
They have conversion kits.
A .223 cal is NOT the same as a 5.56mm round. PERIOD!!!
You're a **** IDIOT if you shoot an interchange like that. Sure a .22 LR can be fired in a .223 AR, since the DIAMETER IS SMALLER in the .22 cal LR. A 5.56mm bullet is 0.2188976 cal. And small difference is enough to peel back a barrel and kill you, ****!!!
I used to shoot 25-06 sabot in my 30-06 SAFELY. but you shoot a .223 cal in a 5.56mm and you split a barrel in your face you **** IDIOT!!
NOTE TO FORUM- NEVER GO SHOOTING WITH THIS **** PIECE OF **** IDIOT. HE'S LIKELY TO KILL YOU WITH HIS BELIEF HE CAN INTERCHANGE CARTRAGES!!
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
21 Feb 2024 4:59 am
Once again your reading and comprehension skills fail you AND you outright lie.R.Suave » 20 Feb 2024, 4:48 pm » wrote: ↑ You clearly were....until I told you about it.
Take it up the Colonel...I'm sure he'll defer to your raghead head count.
Before you ask this is your lie:
You clearly were....until I told you about it.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
21 Feb 2024 6:35 am
Just show me where you attributed the change to advances in body armor.Huey » 21 Feb 2024, 5:59 am » wrote: ↑ Once again your reading and comprehension skills fail you AND you outright lie.
Before you ask this is your lie:
Lying little twat.
21 Feb 2024 6:36 am
R.Suave » 21 Feb 2024, 7:35 am » wrote: ↑ Just show me where you attributed the change to advances in body armor.
Lying little twat.
I didn't say I did. I am saying, as usual, you reframed what I did say.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
21 Feb 2024 6:38 am
Huey » 21 Feb 2024, 7:36 am » wrote: ↑ I didn't say I did. I am saying, as usual, you reframed what I did say.
so you agree you.lied.
21 Feb 2024 6:40 am
@R. SuaveHuey » 19 Feb 2024, 3:52 pm » wrote: ↑ PS. Most rag heads did not have body armor, never mind effective body armor. You have not experience.
Notice the comment was past tense. You then countered with this:
R.
Yammering stool.
The new weapons use 6.8mm rounds as the Army looked for heftier ammo than the current 5.56mm used in the M4 and SAW to better defeat body armor, protective equipment that adversaries are expected to have in future conflicts and gear that is already becoming more commonplace for terror groups
https://www.military.com/daily-news/202 ... rifle.html
THat is present and future tense. Note the BECOMING. Expected to have. Even without the futuristic body armor the round is not performing.
And the round will not sever a the upper body from the lower body or decapitate the combatant.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
21 Feb 2024 6:44 am
Post my lie as I posted yours. For once admit your error graciously.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
21 Feb 2024 6:46 am
That's impossible for him to do.Huey » 21 Feb 2024, 7:44 am » wrote: ↑ Post my lie as I posted yours. For once admit your error graciously.
Literally impossible.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
21 Feb 2024 6:48 am
I made no error.Huey » 21 Feb 2024, 7:44 am » wrote: ↑ Post my lie as I posted yours. For once admit your error graciously.
I didn't lie.Before you ask this is your lie:
You did.
21 Feb 2024 6:55 am
That would require DEMONSTRATING that I'm wrong....not balling your little hands into fists and pounding the children's table.RedheadedStranger » 21 Feb 2024, 7:46 am » wrote: ↑ That's impossible for him to do.
Literally impossible.
21 Feb 2024 6:57 am
Which is exactly what you do, day in and day out on this forum...R.Suave » 21 Feb 2024, 7:55 am » wrote: ↑ That would require DEMONSTRATING that I'm wrong....not balling your little hands into fists and pounding the children's table.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
21 Feb 2024 6:59 am
Dry your tears, Ruby...
Who is online
In total there are 4377 users online :: 13 registered, 14 bots, and 4350 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, Blackvegetable, Buck Naked, ROG62, RebelGator, FJB, Beekeeper, SouthernFried, Lisa 558, nefarious101, sole, ….., Huey
Bots: Bolt, TTD-Content, ADmantX, proximic, CriteoBot, YandexBot, DuckDuckBot, facebookexternalhit, Mediapartners-Google, Googlebot, NING, curl/7, bingbot, Applebot