Liberal Forum

R.Suave » 21 Feb 2024, 7:48 am » wrote: ↑

21 Feb 2024, 7:48 am

I made no error.


I didn't lie.

You did.

 

I'm good with my point that you obviously did not understand.    

R.Suave » 21 Feb 2024, 7:59 am » wrote: ↑

21 Feb 2024, 7:59 am

I dream about TrumpyBear 24/7! I need help!

Poor guy...

 

Huey » 21 Feb 2024, 8:01 am » wrote: ↑

21 Feb 2024, 8:01 am

I'm good with my point that you obviously did not understand.  

Tiny,

You were insisting that the change in round was due to "ragheads using SPF 50".....

Because you're a **** idiot.
 

R.Suave » 21 Feb 2024, 8:08 am » wrote: ↑

21 Feb 2024, 8:08 am

Tiny,

You were insisting that the change in round was due to "ragheads using SPF 50".....

Because you're a **** idiot.

                                                                            (past tense)
Actually, no.  I was pointing out that ragheads did not have effective body armor, if any body armor at all, and the rounds were not that effective.  I am not denying the fact advances in body armor are also a factor.  

The effectiveness of the round has been debated for 60 years, long before advances in body armor. 

Huey » 21 Feb 2024, 8:13 am » wrote: ↑

21 Feb 2024, 8:13 am

                                                                            (past tense)
Actually, no.  I was pointing out that ragheads did not have effective body armor, if any body armor at all, and the rounds were not that effective. (S] I am not denying the fact advances in body armor are also a factor.  [/s]

The effectiveness of the round has been debated for 60 years, long before advances in body armor.

So you never knew the primary reason for the change, until I told you.

R.Suave » 21 Feb 2024, 8:15 am » wrote: ↑

21 Feb 2024, 8:15 am

So you never knew the primary reason for the change, until I told you.

 

I never discussed it.  You created a strawman.  And then you lied about what I wrote.  

Squatchman » 20 Feb 2024, 8:46 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Feb 2024, 8:46 pm

  Mine are loaded with 62 gr jacketed soft point deer hunting rounds for self defense.

A little different performance out of the 62 grain bullets (than 55). Lots of people have gone to "Hybrid" barrels (1:8 twist) for more versatility. Is that what you're using on your 62gr bullets?

Huey » 21 Feb 2024, 8:25 am » wrote: ↑

21 Feb 2024, 8:25 am

I never discussed it. You created a strawman.  And then you lied about what I wrote.

You're lying.

You tried to argue that the original round was always "inadequate"...it's an "intermediate" round....

All a bunch of crap in the service of your debunked sporting rifle narrative.

The .556 round was developed entirely around the idea of causing maximum trauma to human bodies within 500 yds.
 

R.Suave » 21 Feb 2024, 8:34 am » wrote: ↑

21 Feb 2024, 8:34 am

You're lying.

You tried to argue that the original round was always "inadequate"...it's an "intermediate" round....

All a bunch of crap in the service of your debunked sporting rifle narrative.

The .556 round was developed entirely around the idea of causing maximum trauma to human bodies within 500 yds.

I guess your google is broke.  Hell, there was talk for the last 25 years that the US should switch to hollow points because of the issues with the ball ammunition.

Now go google both.  

Huey » 21 Feb 2024, 8:42 am » wrote: ↑

21 Feb 2024, 8:42 am

I guess your google is broke. Hell, there was talk for the last 25 years that the US should switch to hollow points because of the issues with the ball ammunition.

Now go google both.

You can yap when you start getting things right.

R.Suave » 21 Feb 2024, 8:45 am » wrote: ↑

21 Feb 2024, 8:45 am

You can yap when you start getting things right.

 

 

Try again:

I guess your google is broke. Hell, there was talk for the last 25 years that the US should switch to hollow points because of the issues with the ball ammunition.

Now go google both.
 

Huey » 21 Feb 2024, 8:50 am » wrote: ↑

21 Feb 2024, 8:50 am

 

Try again:

I guess your google is broke. Hell, there was talk for the last 25 years that the US should switch to hollow points because of the issues with the ball ammunition.

Now go google both.

I nailed it.

The first time.
 

R.Suave » 21 Feb 2024, 8:54 am » wrote: ↑

21 Feb 2024, 8:54 am

I nailed it.

The first time.

Nah, not really.  But, my work is done here.  

I guess your google is broke. Hell, there was talk for the last 25 years that the US should switch to hollow points because of the issues with the ball ammunition.

Now go google both.

You go ahead and get the last word on this portion of the discussion.  Remember, the discussion about the OP and the effectiveness of the round still stands. 

Huey » 21 Feb 2024, 8:58 am » wrote: ↑

21 Feb 2024, 8:58 am

Nah, not really.  But, my work is done here.  

I guess your google is broke. Hell, there was talk for the last 25 years that the US should switch to hollow points because of the issues with the ball ammunition.

Now go google both.

You go ahead and get the last word on this portion of the discussion.  Remember, the discussion about the OP and the effectiveness of the round still stands.

I still can't for the life of me understand why Rico doesn't just avoid trying to talk about **** he knows absolutely nothing about.

I'm honestly embarrassed for him.

Let him up Huey... he's had enough.

 
 

RedheadedStranger » 21 Feb 2024, 9:17 am » wrote: ↑

21 Feb 2024, 9:17 am

I still can't for the life of me understand why Rico doesn't just avoid trying to talk about **** he knows absolutely nothing about.

I'm honestly embarrassed for him.

Let him up Huey... he's had enough.

 
 

 

HIs past history is he comes from a group of self described intelligent, college educated people who basically play gotcha games.  On issues they are google educated, never admit they are wrong or don't know something, and will reframe and move goal posts in the hopes of getting you to say something they can pounce on.

Huey » 21 Feb 2024, 9:30 am » wrote: ↑

21 Feb 2024, 9:30 am

HIs past history is he comes from a group of self described intelligent, college educated people who basically play gotcha games.  On issues they are google educated, never admit they are wrong or don't know something, and will reframe and move goal posts in the hopes of getting you to say something they can pounce on.

Well, he needs to change tactics then because he sucks at this **** 


 

Skans » 21 Feb 2024, 8:32 am » wrote: ↑

21 Feb 2024, 8:32 am

A little different performance out of the 62 grain bullets (than 55). Lots of people have gone to "Hybrid" barrels (1:8 twist) for more versatility. Is that what you're using on your 62gr bullets?

Nope.
1:7 twist.
 

Squatchman » 21 Feb 2024, 1:40 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Feb 2024, 1:40 pm

Nope.
1:7 twist.

Hey...
You live in Michigan

How many illegals moving into your house?