Liberal Forum

RedheadedStranger » 20 Feb 2024, 9:35 am » wrote: ↑

20 Feb 2024, 9:35 am

With your caved in narrow assed chest, you may be right.

RedheadedStranger » 20 Feb 2024, 9:35 am » wrote: ↑

20 Feb 2024, 9:35 am

With your caved in narrow assed chest, you may be right.

R.Suave » 20 Feb 2024, 10:16 am » wrote: ↑

20 Feb 2024, 10:16 am

I wouldn't go there, Geezer..

It's why you need a gun.

RedheadedStranger » 20 Feb 2024, 11:26 am » wrote: ↑

20 Feb 2024, 11:26 am

You could give me a side profile target... maybe enough to hit that way...  good gut shot anyway 

Huey » 19 Feb 2024, 12:29 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Feb 2024, 12:29 pm

Sounds like this guy sold his integrity....He is paid $200 bucks an hour as a court expert.

Colonel Tucker qualified MSRs as “assault weapons” based on California’s list of cosmetic characteristics that have nothing to do whatsoever with the rifle’s actual functions. He testifies that the selector switch that renders an M-4 capable of automatic fire is a “picayune” or “petty or worthless” difference. By that definition, Colonel Tucker would classify any semiautomatic firearm as a “weapon of war.”

 But he goes further.

 “A single round is capable of severing the upper body from the lower body, or decapitation. The round is designed to kill, not wound, and both the AR-15 and M4 contain barrel rifling to make the round tumble upon impact and cause more severe injury.”

 I’m not doubting the colonel’s combat acumen. I certainly can’t say that’s what I saw in combat. I never witnessed a single 5.56mm round fired at the enemy decapitate or sever a human body in half. If this were true of the 5.56mm cartridge, it would beg the question why the military is spending millions to move to the 6.8mm Next Generation Squad Weapon, using a heavier caliber that carries more kinetic energy downrange. It would also beg the question of why the military also uses 7.62x51mm, .300 Winchester Magnum, .338 Lapua Magnum and .50 BMG caliber ammunition. If the 5.56mm cartridge were that devastating, there would clearly be no additional need for heavier bullets with more gunpowder behind them.

 I’ve killed coyotes and prairie dogs with both 5.56mm and .223 Remington. Nothing of what Colonel Tucker describes ever happened on these much smaller targets. In fact, in my home state, the .223/5.56mm cartridge isn’t considered powerful enough for an ethical harvest of whitetail deer.

https://www.nssf.org/articles/marine-co ... testimony/

I have also shot live targets.  The Colonel is full of ****.  

@R. Suave   is there where you get you info from?

RedheadedStranger » 20 Feb 2024, 11:26 am » wrote: ↑

20 Feb 2024, 11:26 am

You could give me a side profile target... maybe enough to hit that way...  good gut shot anyway 

R.Suave » 20 Feb 2024, 11:37 am » wrote: ↑

20 Feb 2024, 11:37 am

this is some hysterically hysterical ****.

 

R.Suave » 20 Feb 2024, 11:38 am » wrote: ↑

20 Feb 2024, 11:38 am

31 inch waist, 42 jacket...

You?

RedheadedStranger » 20 Feb 2024, 11:46 am » wrote: ↑

20 Feb 2024, 11:46 am

So you still shop in the boys dept.

R.Suave » 20 Feb 2024, 11:51 am » wrote: ↑

20 Feb 2024, 11:51 am

Notice that you didn't answer the question.

Huey » 20 Feb 2024, 11:40 am » wrote: ↑

20 Feb 2024, 11:40 am

You could tell us what is hysterical about it.  I see  you are having a tough go of it on this thread.  The article is spot on.  The 5.56/.223 is an intermediate charged cartridge that some states won't let you use on deer because they feel it is not powerful enought.

It will not sever a body.

RedheadedStranger » 20 Feb 2024, 11:52 am » wrote: ↑

20 Feb 2024, 11:52 am

I promise you I don't shop in the boys dept... and haven't since Jr High school.

R.Suave » 20 Feb 2024, 11:55 am » wrote: ↑

20 Feb 2024, 11:55 am

"False testimony", "tarnished eagles"....

Michael Flynn betrayed America, copped to lying, plead the 5th in response to questions about his involvement in Jan 6th, and you declared him a martyr..

In equally dramatic fashion..
 

 

R.Suave » 20 Feb 2024, 11:55 am » wrote: ↑

20 Feb 2024, 11:55 am

I didn't ask about that.

RedheadedStranger » 20 Feb 2024, 11:58 am » wrote: ↑

20 Feb 2024, 11:58 am

Newsflash Rico... this is an anonymous message board.

You can make any claim about anything you want to, and it doesn't meant squat.

For all we know you're a midget.

Huey » 20 Feb 2024, 11:58 am » wrote: ↑

20 Feb 2024, 11:58 am

The Colonel lied.  No one said anything about treason.  I'll put you in the "I believe the Col. column".

R.Suave » 20 Feb 2024, 12:07 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Feb 2024, 12:07 pm

Ask @Huey  .....insisted I must be an "underwear model"...

RedheadedStranger » 20 Feb 2024, 12:09 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Feb 2024, 12:09 pm

I do remember you posting a cropped underwear picture from a Sears catalog and claiming it was you once...

   

RedheadedStranger » 20 Feb 2024, 12:09 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Feb 2024, 12:09 pm

I do remember you posting a cropped underwear picture from a Sears catalog and claiming it was you once...

   

R.Suave » 20 Feb 2024, 12:07 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Feb 2024, 12:07 pm

Ask @Huey  .....insisted I must be an "underwear model"...