If going Texas, Ken Paxton a much better choice. He kicked in balls of the last vestiges of the disgraced **** Bush dynasty.walkingstick » 22 Feb 2024, 12:16 am » wrote: ↑ stop scratching your balls, mr. trump. go all in on immigration. select greg abbott for v.p. . show. stop tell. let abbott vs harris battle it out. people of usa will side with abbott. oh. your afraid abbott would steal the stage? well you are right on that one.
Isn't Kenny under indictment for securities fraud?Tempest62 » 22 Feb 2024, 1:39 am » wrote: ↑ If going Texas, Ken Paxton a much better choice. He kicked in balls of the last vestiges of the disgraced **** Bush dynasty.
Abbott is a ****** and all in with big tech. **** Abbott.
You are inaccurate about evolving in every topic you debate about saving humanity and tomorrow's children been conceived today.walkingstick » 22 Feb 2024, 12:16 am » wrote: ↑ stop scratching your balls, mr. trump. go all in on immigration. select greg abbott for v.p. . show. stop tell. let abbott vs harris battle it out. people of usa will side with abbott. oh. your afraid abbott would steal the stage? well you are right on that one.
Actually, I think Abbott is far too valuable to lose his leadership in closing the TX border to illegals, and I'd hate to lose him there.walkingstick » 22 Feb 2024, 12:16 am » wrote: ↑ stop scratching your balls, mr. trump. go all in on immigration. select greg abbott for v.p. . show. stop tell. let abbott vs harris battle it out. people of usa will side with abbott. oh. your afraid abbott would steal the stage? well you are right on that one.
look at you playing to social consensus by selecting a female vp. Not that I don't think they are bad choices, as they are persons I can agree about to an extent.Zeets2 » 22 Feb 2024, 8:47 am » wrote: ↑ Actually, I think Abbott is far too valuable to lose his leadership in closing the TX border to illegals, and I'd hate to lose him there.
My choice would be another outsider like Trump himself, someone like Keri Lake or Candace Owens. I'll take either one of them in a debate between ANY Democrat, as I still believe their nominee will NOT be the inept and corrupt Biden. Can't you just picture what either of those women would do to a dope like Kamala in a VP debate?
DAMN, I'd pay good money to see that!!
Frankly, I don't give a **** if his VP selection is a man or woman, or whether he or she be black or white. If you think that choosing one of them is nothing but a social ploy, you couldn't be more wrong.Nostradamus'omh » 22 Feb 2024, 8:52 am » wrote: ↑ look at you playing to social consensus by selecting a female vp. Not that I don't think they are bad choices, as they are persons I can agree about to an extent.
However, they defend humanity over humans evolving as equally eternally separated as displaced. Doesn't solve the underlying problem of this species destroying itself inside out.
does your mind ever read your subliminal brain controlled by other peoples' wishful thinking your body isn't self evidently you since conceived as genetics eternally separates the living replacements changing population forward one at a time in series parallel events taking place now?Zeets2 » 22 Feb 2024, 9:18 am » wrote: ↑ Frankly, I don't give a **** if his VP selection is a man or woman, or whether he or she be black or white. If you think that choosing one of them is nothing but a social ploy, you couldn't be more wrong.
I see only how an outsider like Trump upset the incredible degree of government corruption that existed when he was elected, and I think he needs someone who can be a great mouthpiece for him in the same manner. And the selection of either Keri Lake or Candace Owens would quickly become respected and admired by all in the Republican party, and their common sense would be a perfect mirror of Trump's vision for the country, as someone who is equally capable of fighting back against the media onslaught that is certain to come at his VP selection, no matter who he selects.
Why should the sanctity of life be ignored?
syllogism at ^^^^^^ its worst.Tempest62 » 22 Feb 2024, 10:01 am » wrote: ↑ Why should the sanctity of life be ignored?
Who is going to represent the God given inalienable right to life?
I expect this from someone who laughs at God.
you are so wrapped up in language arts promising tomorrow that you failed to recognize I describe what eternity physically does eternally separating the reproductions adapting in the moment here uniquely timed apart as you and everything else self evidently universally positioned in ever changing form left alive next.
Tempest62 » 22 Feb 2024, 10:01 am » wrote: ↑ Why should the sanctity of life be ignored?
Who is going to represent the God given inalienable right to life?
Abbott isn't on Trump's short list for VP. His short list is: DeSantis, Byron Donalds, Gabbard, Noem, Ramaswamy, and Scott.walkingstick » 22 Feb 2024, 12:16 am » wrote: ↑ stop scratching your balls, mr. trump. go all in on immigration. select greg abbott for v.p. . show. stop tell. let abbott vs harris battle it out. people of usa will side with abbott. oh. your afraid abbott would steal the stage? well you are right on that one.
this is a joke, can you imagine what would happen if Donald picked on of his sons or son in law as vp?or daughter, daughter in law.Skans » 22 Feb 2024, 11:26 am » wrote: ↑ Abbott isn't on Trump's short list for VP. His short list is: DeSantis, Byron Donalds, Gabbard, Noem, Ramaswamy, and Scott.
It won't be Ramaswamy. And, I don't see how it can be DeSantis, since they are from the same state.
What about sanders and StefanicSkans » 22 Feb 2024, 11:26 am » wrote: ↑ Abbott isn't on Trump's short list for VP. His short list is: DeSantis, Byron Donalds, Gabbard, Noem, Ramaswamy, and Scott.
It won't be Ramaswamy. And, I don't see how it can be DeSantis, since they are from the same state.