Please, that idiot only knows how to deny life in real time.R. Suave » 23 Feb 2024, 8:57 am » wrote: ↑ https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/22/opin ... onomy.html
The economic news in 2023 was almost miraculously good. Not only did America’s economy defy widespread predictions of recession, it also defied claims that only a significant rise in unemployment could bring inflation under control. Instead, we got a combination of strong growth, unemployment near a 50-year low and plunging inflation....
First, I was looking at financial markets, where instruments like inflation swaps and index bonds tell you what inflation rates investors putting real money on the line expect. The pricing on these instruments is still pointing to low inflation, around 2 percent or a bit more.
Second, I was waiting to see what happened in the Atlanta Federal Reserve’s survey of business inflation expectations, which asks businesses how much they expect costs to rise over the next year. If inflation were suddenly surging, you’d expect businesses to notice. But their inflation expectations rose to 2.3 percent in February from … 2.2 percent in January.
America thrives, MAGAts rend their garments.
R.Suave » 23 Feb 2024, 8:57 am » wrote: ↑ https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/22/opin ... onomy.html
The economic news in 2023 was almost miraculously good. Not only did America’s economy defy widespread predictions of recession, it also defied claims that only a significant rise in unemployment could bring inflation under control. Instead, we got a combination of strong growth, unemployment near a 50-year low and plunging inflation....
First, I was looking at financial markets, where instruments like inflation swaps and index bonds tell you what inflation rates investors putting real money on the line expect. The pricing on these instruments is still pointing to low inflation, around 2 percent or a bit more.
Second, I was waiting to see what happened in the Atlanta Federal Reserve’s survey of business inflation expectations, which asks businesses how much they expect costs to rise over the next year. If inflation were suddenly surging, you’d expect businesses to notice. But their inflation expectations rose to 2.3 percent in February from … 2.2 percent in January.
America thrives, MAGAts rend their garments.
R.Suave » 23 Feb 2024, 8:57 am » wrote: ↑ https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/22/opin ... onomy.html
The economic news in 2023 was almost miraculously good. Not only did America’s economy defy widespread predictions of recession, it also defied claims that only a significant rise in unemployment could bring inflation under control. Instead, we got a combination of strong growth, unemployment near a 50-year low and plunging inflation....
First, I was looking at financial markets, where instruments like inflation swaps and index bonds tell you what inflation rates investors putting real money on the line expect. The pricing on these instruments is still pointing to low inflation, around 2 percent or a bit more.
Second, I was waiting to see what happened in the Atlanta Federal Reserve’s survey of business inflation expectations, which asks businesses how much they expect costs to rise over the next year. If inflation were suddenly surging, you’d expect businesses to notice. But their inflation expectations rose to 2.3 percent in February from … 2.2 percent in January.
America thrives, MAGAts rend their garments.
No thoughts, etc...copy/paste. Etc...
Yea...he's got a really broad Level 1 base...maineman » 23 Feb 2024, 10:16 am » wrote: ↑ When Nobel Prize winners speak, smart stuff issues forth!
R.Suave » 23 Feb 2024, 10:20 am » wrote: ↑ Yea...he's got a really broad Level 1 base...
His level 7 stuff is remarkably well informed.
Must look like Aramaic to a Level 0, like
@Vegas
Paul "Confetti Head" Krugman is a complete ****.Nostradamus'omh » 23 Feb 2024, 9:00 am » wrote: ↑ Please, that idiot only knows how to deny life in real time.
You notice I agree with that? that fruitcake got how many awards by Global ruling elites?Deezer Shoove » 23 Feb 2024, 10:58 am » wrote: ↑ Paul "Confetti Head" Krugman is a complete ****.
He advocated yet another round of quantitative easing because he is stupid.
From an analyst's 2016 article last lines:
"The Fed ended QE3 and stopped expanding its balance sheet in late 2014.
By early 2016, high inflation as a result of QE had yet to be seen, but as the economy
continues to expand, such potential costs of QE may become reality, and future research
would be needed to quantify them."
Edison Yu
Had we followed Confetti Head's direction, we'd be hurting that much more right now.
That's how they measure success.Nostradamus'omh » 23 Feb 2024, 11:04 am » wrote: ↑ You notice I agree with that? that fruitcake got how many awards by Global ruling elites?
Hey Dickhead Number 1...R.Suave » 23 Feb 2024, 8:57 am » wrote: ↑ https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/22/opin ... onomy.html
The economic news in 2023 was almost miraculously good. Not only did America’s economy defy widespread predictions of recession, it also defied claims that only a significant rise in unemployment could bring inflation under control. Instead, we got a combination of strong growth, unemployment near a 50-year low and plunging inflation....
First, I was looking at financial markets, where instruments like inflation swaps and index bonds tell you what inflation rates investors putting real money on the line expect. The pricing on these instruments is still pointing to low inflation, around 2 percent or a bit more.
Second, I was waiting to see what happened in the Atlanta Federal Reserve’s survey of business inflation expectations, which asks businesses how much they expect costs to rise over the next year. If inflation were suddenly surging, you’d expect businesses to notice. But their inflation expectations rose to 2.3 percent in February from … 2.2 percent in January.
America thrives, MAGAts rend their garments.
But wait, there's moremaineman » 23 Feb 2024, 10:16 am » wrote: ↑ When Nobel Prize winners speak, smart stuff issues forth!
Can you connect your 2016 citation with your bold conclusion?DeezerShoove » 23 Feb 2024, 10:58 am » wrote: ↑ Paul "Confetti Head" Krugman is a complete ****.
He advocated yet another round of quantitative easing because he is stupid.
From an analyst's 2016 article last lines:
"The Fed ended QE3 and stopped expanding its balance sheet in late 2014.
By early 2016, high inflation as a result of QE had yet to be seen, but as the economy
continues to expand, such potential costs of QE may become reality, and future research
would be needed to quantify them."
Edison Yu
Had we followed Confetti Head's direction, we'd be hurting that much more right now.
This is hilarious.Huey » 23 Feb 2024, 12:47 pm » wrote: ↑ But wait, there's more
Paul Krugman and other mainstream trade experts are now admitting that they were wrong about globalization: It hurt American workers far more than they thought it would. Did America’s free market economists help put a protectionist demagogue in the White House?
https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/10/22/ec ... man-china/
A winner of the Nobel Prize in Economics, Paul Krugman wrote in 1998, “The growth of the Internet will slow drastically, as the flaw in ‘Metcalfe’s law’—which states that the number of potential connections in a network is proportional to the square of the number of participants—becomes apparent: most people have nothing to say to each other! By 2005 or so, it will become clear that the Internet’s impact on the economy has been no greater than the fax machine’s.”
https://www.laphamsquarterly.org/revolu ... prediction
https://thespectator.com/topic/the-top- ... axEALw_wcB
Oh, you can listen, but make sure you question......
R.Suave » 23 Feb 2024, 1:52 pm » wrote: ↑ This is hilarious.
A) you're innumerate
B) your influencers lie rotting on boot hill.
C) you have no idea what to ask
D) what search string did you use? The same as Coozie?
R.Suave » 23 Feb 2024, 1:49 pm » wrote: ↑ Can you connect your 2016 citation with your bold conclusion?
I have another idea In the Old Testament The burning bush told Moses to answer anyone asking Who is in charge of your time living here now? the answer is "I am".Deezer Shoove » 23 Feb 2024, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑ That's how they measure success.
How many credentials/awards did their compadres give each other?
Sickening.
Nostradamus'omh » 23 Feb 2024, 3:41 pm » wrote: ↑ I have another idea In the Old Testament The burning bush told Moses to answer anyone asking Who is in charge of your time living here now? the answer is "I am".
Now compare "I am" here same as "you are" now, and no we consensus can alter that result of ancestry changing population so far. I don't disrespect what God represent, I just don't follow the tyranny practiced within a one god, many gods religions be they theology, or mythology, or scientology, sociology of governing generation gaps by power of suggesting life isn't self evident. that leaves this species misleading each other in the promise of being chosen people, that ruling elites feel like exceptions to natural displacement one elected to be in charge of the future "unfolding from past behaviors.".
Why history dictates policies applied to next generation already arriving one at a time now. It is always centered around relative time logistics no matter how money and alternate realities are at fault and every generation gap is blaming every other.
this is why I post like I do and nobody will agree. The simplicity of understanding natural time limit to adapt or become extinct rises from genetic outcomes only live eternally separated now and homo sapien species were the only ones capable of denying it. The price for being the top predator added to the food chain.
This species is smart enough to fool itself into self extinction intellectually. Instincts will try to prevent it and rule of law eliminates any brain trying since it most likely would arrive last generation added since previous 4 were already programmed to follow previous generation gaps social behavior written in history of legal precedences and spiritual convictions against anyone questioning societal evolutionists being in the chain of command to academia, arts, economics, politics, relitions, social consensus by community organizers.
Leaderships to fellowships are as much as sacrificial lambs as the fellowships themselves. Middle class management of tomorrow is 8 great grandparents and siblings, 4 grandparents and siblings, 2 parenting last generation gap so far.
MY thinking fits how humanity has governed since dawn of civilization as life never exceeded mutually evolving here since conceived to replace previous 4 generation gaps.
All the cycles of life only are living here(this moment of universal perpetual balancing) now. It limits life in any atmosphere to remain native to its unique atmosphere as ancestors are to ancestry. Eternity doing eternal separation in plain sight and that is essentially the intellectual God element to any religion, mythology, scientology.
it is the original sin to one's own brain is to mind social consensus one isn't one of a kind.
I trust you will call it nonsense and gibberish again. It is expected.
Trust me, I am not worried. I know I cannot stop it but I can explain what is coming in this decade. This species is intellectually erasing itself from history and current events to become some intellectual entities with no bodies.Deezer Shoove » 23 Feb 2024, 3:56 pm » wrote: ↑ You worry too much.
I think you believe in some version of hell or a "retribution" after this life.
Religion is a good way to teach people that it's important and yields real and tangible results when you treat others well. If needing to think that "God's gonna getcha" is what it takes for pricks to not be such pricks, I'm all for it. The Golden Rule.
In this view, I don't need to believe an afterlife exists in a heaven or hell.
That's just how I happen to think. Opinions vary. :cool: