Liberal Forum

https://www.statista.com/statistics/195 ... apon-used/

knifes 1630

Rifles 541

i a@R. Suave  will be leading the charge 

more children in America- have been killed with Fentanyl.... but don't worry about that? Don't try to stop it? Let the kids die so the libbies can get a few more votes. Its ELECTION year... very sickening to me!

Huey » 02 Mar 2024, 2:06 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2024, 2:06 pm

https://www.statista.com/statistics/195 ... apon-used/

knifes 1630

Rifles 541

i a@R. Suave  will be leading the charge

Good thing all of my knives are unregistered....  
 

No bans. Just allow the victims and families of knife violence to sue the cutlery industry for their product being misused by criminals.

ROG62 » 02 Mar 2024, 2:42 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2024, 2:42 pm

Good thing all of my knives are unregistered....

Yeah, you may have to get a CCP to carry one.

Huey » 02 Mar 2024, 2:06 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2024, 2:06 pm

https://www.statista.com/statistics/195 ... apon-used/

knifes 1630

Rifles 541

i a@R. Suave  will be leading the charge

Dumbest **** Alive.

R.Suave » 02 Mar 2024, 4:04 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2024, 4:04 pm

Dumbest **** Alive.

Yes your are.  Love your signature block.

More people are killed with knives than they are with ALL rifle.  To include those scary black rifles you fear so much.  So you must want to ban them.

 

Huey » 02 Mar 2024, 4:23 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2024, 4:23 pm

Yes your are.  Love your signature block.

More people are killed with knives than they are with ALL rifle.  To include those scary black rifles you fear so much.  So you must want to ban them.

To include those scary black rifles you fear so much.  So you must want to ban them.

Not once have I cited this as reason to ban them.

Why do you lie about it?

First time.

R.Suave » 02 Mar 2024, 4:28 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2024, 4:28 pm

Not once have I cited this as reason to ban them.

Why do you lie about it?

First time.

Oh, my bad.  You don't care about dead people from violence.  You advocate it, like for those who didn't wear mask or get the vax.  My bad.  Although you weren't man enough to do it yourself.

You just don't like the people you PERCEIVE are attracted to the black scary weapons you fear.  

Acknowledge you were answered.  

Huey » 02 Mar 2024, 4:33 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2024, 4:33 pm

Oh, my bad.  You don't care about dead people from violence.  You advocate it, like for those who didn't wear mask or get the vax.  My bad.  Although you weren't man enough to do it yourself.

You just don't like the people you PERCEIVE are attracted to the black scary weapons you fear. 

Acknowledge you were answered.

The question isn't about me.

Try again.
 

R.Suave » 02 Mar 2024, 4:40 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2024, 4:40 pm

The question isn't about me.

Try again.

I’m good.  I answered you.




 

Huey » 02 Mar 2024, 4:44 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2024, 4:44 pm

I’m good.  I answered you.

Run.

R.Suave » 02 Mar 2024, 4:46 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2024, 4:46 pm

Run.

I am right here.  You want to ban semi automatic sports rifles because you erroneously believe they were designed for the battle field AND who you perceive they attract.

Now keep lying, Titled Family Boy.

Huey » 02 Mar 2024, 4:47 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2024, 4:47 pm

I am right here.  You want to ban semi automatic sports rifles because you erroneously believe they were designed for the battle field AND who you perceive they attract.

Now keep lying, Titled Family Boy.

There is nothing erroneous about my position.

R.Suave » 02 Mar 2024, 4:49 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2024, 4:49 pm

There is nothing erroneous about my position.

Well, except the art you claim those black scary weapons were designed for combat.  Problem is you have been given the new design, what is different from the combat rife, it has never been used in combat, and the ATF classification letter that says you are liar.

What else ya got?  Nothing supports your argument.

Huey » 02 Mar 2024, 4:51 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2024, 4:51 pm

Well, except the art you claim those black scary weapons were designed for combat.  Problem is you have been given the new design, what is different from the combat rife, it has never been used in combat, and the ATF classification letter that says you are liar.

What else ya got?  Nothing supports your argument.

the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... ian_models

 
How many families?

How many designs?

R.Suave » 02 Mar 2024, 5:08 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2024, 5:08 pm

the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... ian_models

How many families?

How many designs?

THat's nice.

Read more: https://www.ammoland.com/2021/12/origin ... z8TMHozk00
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution
Follow us: @Ammoland on Twitter | Ammoland on Facebook

Original ATF AR-15 Classification Refutes Claim that Rifle ‘Not Meant’ for Civilians

Read the embedded BATF classification letter.  Pay particular attention to the part that talks about the change in basic design.

Now that talking point of yours is dead, what else you got?

Huey » 02 Mar 2024, 5:12 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2024, 5:12 pm

THat's nice.

Read more: https://www.ammoland.com/2021/12/origin ... z8TMHozk00
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution
Follow us: @Ammoland on Twitter | Ammoland on Facebook

Original ATF AR-15 Classification Refutes Claim that Rifle ‘Not Meant’ for Civilians

Read the embedded BATF classification letter.  Pay particular attention to the part that talks about the change in basic design.

Now that talking point of yours is dead, what else you got?

How can we be certain it must be irrelevant?

R. » wrote:

29 Jan 1970, 8:10 pm

Huey » 02 Mar 2024, 5:12 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2024, 5:12 pm

THat's nice.

Read more: https://www.ammoland.com/2021/12/origin ... z8TMHozk00
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution
Follow us: @Ammoland on Twitter | Ammoland on Facebook

Original ATF AR-15 Classification Refutes Claim that Rifle ‘Not Meant’ for Civilians

Read the embedded BATF classification letter.  Pay particular attention to the part that talks about the change in basic design.

Now that talking point of yours is dead, what else you got?

How can we be certain it must be irrelevant?

You need to bring more to this conversation than questions. Askholio.

Just post when this weapon (the Colt AR 15 SPORTER  )that was designed for civilians, according to the BATF, was actually ISSUED TO US INFANTRY UNITS  and used in combat.

If you do I will take 3 days off fro posting.

It will cost you nothing other than me bringing up the fact you lost this challenge.
 

Huey » 02 Mar 2024, 2:06 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2024, 2:06 pm

https://www.statista.com/statistics/195 ... apon-used/

knifes 1630

Rifles 541

i a@R. Suave  will be leading the charge 

titles like your get my instincts on full alert I am being triggered again. the carefully worded title specifying rifles vs knives.