Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
A large percentage of Republicans can't stomach voting for trump in Nov.
A large percentage of Republicans can't stomach voting for trump in Nov.
By Bidencrimefamily
3 Mar 2024 4:18 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
3 Mar 2024 4:18 pm
PPORT INDEPENDENT, FACT-BASED JOURNALISM.
DONATE
Menu
Show Search
Israel-Hamas war
Caitlin Clark breaks scoring record
New search for MH370
‘Dune: Part Two’
Oregon drug recriminalization
POLITICS
A chunk of Republican primary and caucus voters say they wouldn’t vote for Trump as the GOP nominee
BY LINLEY SANDERS, JESSE BEDAYN AND AMELIA THOMSON-DEVEAUX
Updated 11:45 AM CST, March 3, 2024
Share
WASHINGTON (AP) — A small but substantial chunk of Republican primary and caucus voters say they would be so dissatisfied if Donald Trump became the party’s presidential nominee that they would not vote for him in November’s general election, according to AP VoteCast.
An analysis of the data shows that many of those voters were unlikely to vote for Trump, some even before this year, but it still points to potential problems for the former president as he looks to consolidate the nomination and pivot toward an expected rematch with Democratic President Joe Biden.
According to AP VoteCast surveys of the first three head-to-head Republican contests, 2 in 10 Iowa voters, one-third of New Hampshire voters, and one-quarter of South Carolina voters would be so disappointed by Trump’s renomination that they would refuse to vote for him in the fall.
ADVERTISEMENT
This unwillingness to contemplate a presidential vote for Trump isn’t confined to voters in the earliest states.
Lee and Bill Baltzell defected from the Republican Party to register as independents a year ago. They attended a rally for supporters of Trump’s last major rival, former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley, last week in Centennial, Colorado, to encourage her to keep running against Trump.
“We don’t know that Trump will run into more legal problems and be disqualified, and I’d rather not see Biden in there for another four years,” said Bill Baltzell, 60.
DONATE
Menu
Show Search
Israel-Hamas war
Caitlin Clark breaks scoring record
New search for MH370
‘Dune: Part Two’
Oregon drug recriminalization
POLITICS
A chunk of Republican primary and caucus voters say they wouldn’t vote for Trump as the GOP nominee
BY LINLEY SANDERS, JESSE BEDAYN AND AMELIA THOMSON-DEVEAUX
Updated 11:45 AM CST, March 3, 2024
Share
WASHINGTON (AP) — A small but substantial chunk of Republican primary and caucus voters say they would be so dissatisfied if Donald Trump became the party’s presidential nominee that they would not vote for him in November’s general election, according to AP VoteCast.
An analysis of the data shows that many of those voters were unlikely to vote for Trump, some even before this year, but it still points to potential problems for the former president as he looks to consolidate the nomination and pivot toward an expected rematch with Democratic President Joe Biden.
According to AP VoteCast surveys of the first three head-to-head Republican contests, 2 in 10 Iowa voters, one-third of New Hampshire voters, and one-quarter of South Carolina voters would be so disappointed by Trump’s renomination that they would refuse to vote for him in the fall.
ADVERTISEMENT
This unwillingness to contemplate a presidential vote for Trump isn’t confined to voters in the earliest states.
Lee and Bill Baltzell defected from the Republican Party to register as independents a year ago. They attended a rally for supporters of Trump’s last major rival, former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley, last week in Centennial, Colorado, to encourage her to keep running against Trump.
“We don’t know that Trump will run into more legal problems and be disqualified, and I’d rather not see Biden in there for another four years,” said Bill Baltzell, 60.
motherjones...
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
The trump and his supporters ridicule moderate Republicans all of the time. Call them names,send threats, they aren't going to vote for him.
Trump only has his base of fervent followers willing to vote for him now.
It won't be enough.
Trump only has his base of fervent followers willing to vote for him now.
It won't be enough.
Motherjones?
Don't you realize that mother Jones is fake journalism for people under 80 iq?
more of this ****, Rippy?
Post the crap you read which you believe is better.
You wake up to Drudge, right?FOS » 04 Mar 2024, 8:52 am » wrote: ↑ Don't you realize that mother Jones is fake journalism for people under 80 iq?
Do you really think an actual national socialist would ever read that?? Lol...
The motherjones headline...R.Suave » 04 Mar 2024, 9:05 am » wrote: ↑ more of this ****, Rippy?
Post the crap you read which you believe is better.
A Large Percentage of Republican Primary Voters Can’t Stomach Trump
Verses the first paragraph of the AP story that motherjones is citing...
WASHINGTON (AP) — A small but substantial chunk of Republican primary and caucus voters say they would be so dissatisfied if Donald Trump became the party’s presidential nominee that they would not vote for him in November’s general election, according to AP VoteCast.
See the difference there Rico?
This is why I'm laughing...
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
I don't see any titles, Rippy.RedheadedStranger » 04 Mar 2024, 9:25 am » wrote: ↑ The motherjones headline...
A Large Percentage of Republican Primary Voters Can’t Stomach Trump
Verses the first paragraph of the AP story that motherjones is citing...
WASHINGTON (AP) — A small but substantial chunk of Republican primary and caucus voters say they would be so dissatisfied if Donald Trump became the party’s presidential nominee that they would not vote for him in November’s general election, according to AP VoteCast.
See the difference there Rico?
This is why I'm laughing...
That's because you're an idiot.
nod
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
I know it's de rigueur for morons...FOS » 04 Mar 2024, 9:17 am » wrote: ↑ Do you really think an actual national socialist would ever read that?? Lol...
do you think someone like Ezra Pound would have liked it?
I doubt he relied on curated readings.
Interesting answer
Who is online
In total there are 6700 users online :: 10 registered, 15 bots, and 6675 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, Blackvegetable, Buck Naked, ROG62, RebelGator, ConservativeWave, nefarious101, springfield xd, Huey, Fuelman
Bots: DuckDuckGo, Bolt, SiteLockSpider, MQQBrowser, LCC, YandexBot, ADmantX, facebookexternalhit, proximic, CriteoBot, Googlebot, Mediapartners-Google, bingbot, curl/7, Applebot