Liberal Forum

A VIOLATION is subject to DISBARMENT and her marching her fat black *** into that CHURCH and polluting the JURY POOL with her comments is all it took!!

BuhBye FAT BLACK *** FANI AND WADE!!!


Ga. Rules of Professional Conduct 3.8Rule 3.8 - Special Responsibilities of a Prosecutor

 The prosecutor in a criminal case shall:

 (a) refrain from prosecuting a charge that the prosecutor knows is not supported by probable cause;

 (b) refrain from making any effort to prevent the accused from exercising a reasonable effort to obtain counsel;

 (c) comply with Rule 4.2 ;

 (d) make timely disclosure to the defense of all evidence or information known to the prosecutor that tends to negate the guilt of the accused or that mitigates the offense;

 (e) exercise reasonable care to prevent persons who are under the direct supervision of the prosecutor from making an extrajudicial statement that the prosecutor would be prohibited from making under subsection (g) of this Rule;

(f) not subpoena a lawyer in a grand jury or other criminal proceeding to present evidence about a past or present client unless the prosecutor reasonably believes:

(1) the information sought is not protected from disclosure by any applicable privilege;
(2) the evidence sought is essential to the successful completion of an ongoing investigation or prosecution; and
(3) there is no other feasible alternative to obtain the information.

(g) except for statements that are necessary to inform the public of the nature and extent of the prosecutor's action and that serve a legitimate law enforcement purpose, refrain from making extrajudicial comments that have a substantial likelihood of heightening public condemnation of the accused;

 (h) promptly disclose new, credible, and material evidence creating a reasonable likelihood that a convicted defendant did not commit an offense of which the defendant was convicted to an appropriate court or authority. If the conviction was obtained in the prosecutor's jurisdiction, the prosecutor shall promptly disclose that evidence to the defendant unless a court authorizes delay and undertake further investigation, or make reasonable efforts to cause an investigation, to determine whether the defendant was convicted of an offense that the defendant did not commit;

 (i) seek to remedy a conviction obtained in the prosecutor's jurisdiction when the prosecutor knows of clear and convincing evidence establishing that a defendant did not commit the offense.

 The maximum penalty for a violation of this Rule is disbarment.
 

Beekeeper » 03 Mar 2024, 8:43 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Mar 2024, 8:43 pm

A VIOLATION is subject to DISBARMENT and her marching her fat black *** into that CHURCH and polluting the JURY POOL with her comments is all it took!!

BuhBye FAT BLACK *** FANI AND WADE!!!

Ga. Rules of Professional Conduct 3.8Rule 3.8 - Special Responsibilities of a Prosecutor

 The prosecutor in a criminal case shall:

 (a) refrain from prosecuting a charge that the prosecutor knows is not supported by probable cause;

 (b) refrain from making any effort to prevent the accused from exercising a reasonable effort to obtain counsel;

 (c) comply with Rule 4.2 ;

 (d) make timely disclosure to the defense of all evidence or information known to the prosecutor that tends to negate the guilt of the accused or that mitigates the offense;

 (e) exercise reasonable care to prevent persons who are under the direct supervision of the prosecutor from making an extrajudicial statement that the prosecutor would be prohibited from making under subsection (g) of this Rule;

(f) not subpoena a lawyer in a grand jury or other criminal proceeding to present evidence about a past or present client unless the prosecutor reasonably believes:

(1) the information sought is not protected from disclosure by any applicable privilege;
(2) the evidence sought is essential to the successful completion of an ongoing investigation or prosecution; and
(3) there is no other feasible alternative to obtain the information.

(g) except for statements that are necessary to inform the public of the nature and extent of the prosecutor's action and that serve a legitimate law enforcement purpose, refrain from making extrajudicial comments that have a substantial likelihood of heightening public condemnation of the accused;

 (h) promptly disclose new, credible, and material evidence creating a reasonable likelihood that a convicted defendant did not commit an offense of which the defendant was convicted to an appropriate court or authority. If the conviction was obtained in the prosecutor's jurisdiction, the prosecutor shall promptly disclose that evidence to the defendant unless a court authorizes delay and undertake further investigation, or make reasonable efforts to cause an investigation, to determine whether the defendant was convicted of an offense that the defendant did not commit;

 (i) seek to remedy a conviction obtained in the prosecutor's jurisdiction when the prosecutor knows of clear and convincing evidence establishing that a defendant did not commit the offense.

 The maximum penalty for a violation of this Rule is disbarment.

Did the Judge rule yet?
 

Skans » 04 Mar 2024, 9:36 am » wrote: ↑

04 Mar 2024, 9:36 am

Did the Judge rule yet?

The story I read yesterday said it would probably be a couple of weeks before the decision is made.

Black Ho Down....sounds like a movie

Beekeeper » 03 Mar 2024, 8:43 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Mar 2024, 8:43 pm

A VIOLATION is subject to DISBARMENT and her marching her fat black *** into that CHURCH and polluting the JURY POOL with her comments is all it took!!

BuhBye FAT BLACK *** FANI AND WADE!!!

Ga. Rules of Professional Conduct 3.8Rule 3.8 - Special Responsibilities of a Prosecutor

 The prosecutor in a criminal case shall:

 (a) refrain from prosecuting a charge that the prosecutor knows is not supported by probable cause;

 (b) refrain from making any effort to prevent the accused from exercising a reasonable effort to obtain counsel;

 (c) comply with Rule 4.2 ;

 (d) make timely disclosure to the defense of all evidence or information known to the prosecutor that tends to negate the guilt of the accused or that mitigates the offense;

 (e) exercise reasonable care to prevent persons who are under the direct supervision of the prosecutor from making an extrajudicial statement that the prosecutor would be prohibited from making under subsection (g) of this Rule;

(f) not subpoena a lawyer in a grand jury or other criminal proceeding to present evidence about a past or present client unless the prosecutor reasonably believes:

(1) the information sought is not protected from disclosure by any applicable privilege;
(2) the evidence sought is essential to the successful completion of an ongoing investigation or prosecution; and
(3) there is no other feasible alternative to obtain the information.

(g) except for statements that are necessary to inform the public of the nature and extent of the prosecutor's action and that serve a legitimate law enforcement purpose, refrain from making extrajudicial comments that have a substantial likelihood of heightening public condemnation of the accused;

 (h) promptly disclose new, credible, and material evidence creating a reasonable likelihood that a convicted defendant did not commit an offense of which the defendant was convicted to an appropriate court or authority. If the conviction was obtained in the prosecutor's jurisdiction, the prosecutor shall promptly disclose that evidence to the defendant unless a court authorizes delay and undertake further investigation, or make reasonable efforts to cause an investigation, to determine whether the defendant was convicted of an offense that the defendant did not commit;

 (i) seek to remedy a conviction obtained in the prosecutor's jurisdiction when the prosecutor knows of clear and convincing evidence establishing that a defendant did not commit the offense.

 The maximum penalty for a violation of this Rule is disbarment.

IF SO... It COULDN'T HAPPEN to a more BIASED, DISHONEST, CORRUPT, and DESERVING SCUMBAG !!

RedheadedStranger » 04 Mar 2024, 10:09 am » wrote: ↑

04 Mar 2024, 10:09 am

The story I read yesterday said it would probably be a couple of weeks before the decision is made.

What the heck is the judge doing for 2 weeks?  Investigating the facts?  Diddling his pecker?  Just curious, does a Jury get a 2-week expense paid vacation to sit around and do nothing?
 

Skans » 04 Mar 2024, 10:34 am » wrote: ↑

04 Mar 2024, 10:34 am

What the heck is the judge doing for 2 weeks?  Investigating the facts?  Diddling his pecker?  Just curious, does a Jury get a 2-week expense paid vacation to sit around and do nothing?

Probably running cover for Fani.

 

Disbarred? Maybe just removed from case I don’t know that may not even happen

Skans » 04 Mar 2024, 10:34 am » wrote: ↑

04 Mar 2024, 10:34 am

What the heck is the judge doing for 2 weeks?  Investigating the facts?  Diddling his pecker?  Just curious, does a Jury get a 2-week expense paid vacation to sit around and do nothing?

Is it a jury trial?