Liberal Forum

9-0   

Warcok » 04 Mar 2024, 10:04 am » wrote: ↑

04 Mar 2024, 10:04 am

9-0 

Kind of hard to dispute 9-0.


 

Well, @R. Suave  , it looks like you were wrong about the CO ruling. 

 The unanimous decision said that “States have no power under the Constitution to” enforce the provision disqualifying people from federal office if they engaged in insurrection, “especially the Presidency.” The ruling said states could disqualify people from holding state offices on those grounds.The ruling mean that no other state can bar Trump, or any other candidate, from a presidential ballot by invoking the insurrection clause in the Constitution.

https://www.cnbc.com/2024/03/04/supreme ... -case.html
 

Colorado, Colorado, Colorado.......Russia Russia Russia........Kavanaugh Kavanaugh Kavanaugh....Georgia Georgia Georgia


the list just keeps getting bigger

Huey » 04 Mar 2024, 10:19 am » wrote: ↑

04 Mar 2024, 10:19 am

Well, @R. Suave  , it looks like you were wrong about the CO ruling. 

 The unanimous decision said that “States have no power under the Constitution to” enforce the provision disqualifying people from federal office if they engaged in insurrection, “especially the Presidency.” The ruling said states could disqualify people from holding state offices on those grounds.The ruling mean that no other state can bar Trump, or any other candidate, from a presidential ballot by invoking the insurrection clause in the Constitution.

https://www.cnbc.com/2024/03/04/supreme ... -case.html

That is actually prett much what I predicted they would do.

They would challenge the existing process for states to determine ballot eligibility of candidates for national office.
That process will now be established by Congress....

The GROUNDS on which Grifty was disqualified remain unchallenged to this point.

 

R.Suave » 04 Mar 2024, 10:27 am » wrote: ↑

04 Mar 2024, 10:27 am

That is actually prett much what I predicted they would do.

They would challenge the existing process for states to determine ballot eligibility of candidates for national office.
That process will now be established by Congress....

The GROUNDS on which Grifty was disqualified remain unchallenged to this point.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
         
 

ayden reposted
Pyotr Kurzin@PKurzin

Breaking: US Supreme Court has officially ruled that Trump can stay on the presidential ballot.

States can no longer remove him based on the grounds of his involvement in January 6th. 

It also means the overturning of existing rulings by states such as Colorado.

 

R.Suave » 04 Mar 2024, 10:27 am » wrote: ↑

04 Mar 2024, 10:27 am

That is actually prett much what I predicted they would do.

They would challenge the existing process for states to determine ballot eligibility of candidates for national office.
That process will now be established by Congress....

The GROUNDS on which Grifty was disqualified remain unchallenged to this point.

LMAO!  

R.Suave » 04 Mar 2024, 10:27 am » wrote: ↑

04 Mar 2024, 10:27 am

That is actually prett much what I predicted they would do.

They would challenge the existing process for states to determine ballot eligibility of candidates for national office.
That process will now be established by Congress....

The GROUNDS on which Grifty was disqualified remain unchallenged to this point.

Anything one Congress establishes can be undone by a subsequent Congress. 

R.Suave » 04 Mar 2024, 10:27 am » wrote: ↑

04 Mar 2024, 10:27 am

That is actually prett much what I predicted they would do.

They would challenge the existing process for states to determine ballot eligibility of candidates for national office.
That process will now be established by Congress....

The GROUNDS on which Grifty was disqualified remain unchallenged to this point.

EAT **** AND DIE YOU **** CHINK LOVER

ConsRule » 04 Mar 2024, 10:38 am » wrote: ↑

04 Mar 2024, 10:38 am

Anything one Congress establishes can be undone by a subsequent Congress.

It was the point of least resistance, but I doubt it will prove very satisfactory.

Getting into state administration of elections will create a mess.
 

R.Suave » 04 Mar 2024, 10:49 am » wrote: ↑

04 Mar 2024, 10:49 am

It was the point of least resistance, but I doubt it will prove very satisfactory.

Getting into state administration of elections will create a mess.

Guess you were wrong?

BooRadley » 04 Mar 2024, 10:50 am » wrote: ↑

04 Mar 2024, 10:50 am

Guess you were wrong?

No....I was satisfied that SCOTUS would leave him on the ballot and predicted the argument they would provide.

R.Suave » 04 Mar 2024, 11:05 am » wrote: ↑

04 Mar 2024, 11:05 am

No....I was satisfied that SCOTUS would leave him on the ballot and predicted the argument they would provide.

You're full of it.

You've been arguing for removal for weeks

9-0

That's gotta hurt
​​​
 

BooRadley » 04 Mar 2024, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑

04 Mar 2024, 11:10 am

You're full of it.

You've been arguing for removal for weeks

9-0

That's gotta hurt
​​​

it isn't...

The Due Process question will involve whether or not the route this issue took to the Colorado Supreme Court met an unarticulated constitutional standard

R. Suave
29 Dec 2023, 10:45 am

R.Suave » 04 Mar 2024, 11:16 am » wrote: ↑

04 Mar 2024, 11:16 am

R. Suave
29 Dec 2023, 10:45 am

Shilly is done

R.Suave » 04 Mar 2024, 11:16 am » wrote: ↑

04 Mar 2024, 11:16 am

R. Suave
29 Dec 2023, 10:45 am

It wasn't a matter of due process...it was a matter of Constitutional standing/authority.
 

BooRadley » 04 Mar 2024, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑

04 Mar 2024, 11:10 am

You're full of it.

You've been arguing for removal for weeks

9-0

That's gotta hurt
​​​

The appeal can't relitigate the finding of fact, it can only consider whether the law in Colorado provides insufficient Due Process to disqualify.

29 Dec 2023, 10:24 am

ConsRule » 04 Mar 2024, 11:22 am » wrote: ↑

04 Mar 2024, 11:22 am

It wasn't a matter of due process...it was a matter of Constitutional standing/authority.

I don't see an issue of "Standing".....and, until this morning, Colorado certainly enjoyed the authority to regulate its elections.

Now if only he wins Colorado lol icing on the cake