Liberal Forum

The labor market showed resiliency in February, adding 275,000 jobs, a sign that economic growth is still solid.

https://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/03/08 ... ry-economy

As Joementum continues to defy all efforts to contain it, they might have to call in 



 
 

R.Suave » 08 Mar 2024, 8:42 am » wrote: ↑

08 Mar 2024, 8:42 am

The labor market showed resiliency in February, adding 275,000 jobs, a sign that economic growth is still solid.

https://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/03/08 ... ry-economy

As Joementum continues to defy all efforts to contain it, they might have to call in 

I saw this one and for some reason I had to think of you..

 

https://youtu.be/MjFinVkPwt0

Jantje_Smit » 08 Mar 2024, 8:50 am » wrote: ↑

08 Mar 2024, 8:50 am

I saw this one and for some reason I had to think of you..

 

https://youtu.be/MjFinVkPwt0

 

Jantje_Smit » 08 Mar 2024, 8:50 am » wrote: ↑

08 Mar 2024, 8:50 am

I saw this one and for some reason I had to think of you..

 

https://youtu.be/MjFinVkPwt0

Why?

I'm not the one who watches **** like that...I don't "watch" at all.....except anime and really good series...
 

R.Suave » 08 Mar 2024, 8:53 am » wrote: ↑

08 Mar 2024, 8:53 am

Why?

I'm not the one who watches **** like that... 

No, you're the one who produces **** like that...

 
 

 

R.Suave » 08 Mar 2024, 8:42 am » wrote: ↑

08 Mar 2024, 8:42 am

The labor market showed resiliency in February, adding 275,000 jobs, a sign that economic growth is still solid.

https://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/03/08 ... ry-economy

As Joementum continues to defy all efforts to contain it, they might have to call in 

 

That's what comes from reading nothing but the headlines, nitwit.  You're celebrating the fact that we LOST 187,000 FULL TIME jobs in February, while part-time jobs rose by 51,000.  Then you can take away another 52,000 jobs added to the bloated government payroll, which hurts the economy more than helps it.  Meanwhile, the unemployment rate rose again, and add another 3.1% to the staggering rate of inflation over the past 3 years of Bidenomics, while wages only rose one-tenth of 1%, proving that wages are STILL not keeping up with Biden's inflation.

You're just lucky that the Biden ***-licking by the left-wing fake-news media continues to trumpet certain facts while hiding any that make Biden the failure we all know he is! 

So wipe that brown stain off your nose, fool!   

U.S. job growth totaled 275,000 in February but unemployment rate rises to 3.9%CNBC FRI, MAR 8 2024Job creation skewed toward part-time positions. Full-time jobs decreased by 187,000 while part-time employment rose by 51,000, according to the household survey. That count is used to calculate the unemployment rate and showed a decline of 184,000 in total employment.From a sector standpoint, health care led with 67,000 new jobs. Government again was a big contributor, with 52,000 new jobs.  Wages rose just 0.1% on the month, one-tenth of a percentage point below the estimate.

 

Zeets2 » 08 Mar 2024, 9:29 am » wrote: ↑

08 Mar 2024, 9:29 am

That's what comes from reading nothing but the headlines, nitwit.  You're celebrating the fact that we LOST 187,000 FULL TIME jobs in February, while part-time jobs rose by 51,000.  Then you can take away another 52,000 jobs added to the bloated government payroll, which hurts the economy more than helps it.  Meanwhile, the unemployment rate rose again, and add another 3.1% to the staggering rate of inflation over the past 3 years of Bidenomics, while wages only rose one-tenth of 1%, proving that wages are STILL not keeping up with Biden's inflation.

You're just lucky that the Biden ***-licking by the left-wing fake-news media continues to trumpet certain facts while hiding any that make Biden the failure we all know he is! 

So wipe that brown stain off your nose, fool! 

Don't confuse him with facts...it ruins his day.    
 

Zeets2 » 08 Mar 2024, 9:29 am » wrote: ↑

08 Mar 2024, 9:29 am

That's what comes from reading nothing but the headlines, nitwit.  You're celebrating the fact that we LOST 187,000 FULL TIME jobs in February, while part-time jobs rose by 51,000.  Then you can take away another 52,000 jobs added to the bloated government payroll, which hurts the economy more than helps it.  Meanwhile, the unemployment rate rose again, and add another 3.1% to the staggering rate of inflation over the past 3 years of Bidenomics, while wages only rose one-tenth of 1%, proving that wages are STILL not keeping up with Biden's inflation.

You're just lucky that the Biden ***-licking by the left-wing fake-news media continues to trumpet certain facts while hiding any that make Biden the failure we all know he is! 

So wipe that brown stain off your nose, fool! 

If you ever debate employment and wonder if your correspondent is an idiot, just wait for....

according to the household survey

Zeet,

Are you getting the **** you won't link from Andy Puzder?

R.Suave » 08 Mar 2024, 8:42 am » wrote: ↑

08 Mar 2024, 8:42 am

The labor market showed resiliency in February, adding 275,000 jobs, a sign that economic growth is still solid.

https://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/03/08 ... ry-economy

As Joementum continues to defy all efforts to contain it, they might have to call in 

Unemployment rate is still in the toilet asswipe

FJB » 08 Mar 2024, 9:48 am » wrote: ↑

08 Mar 2024, 9:48 am

Unemployment rate is still in the toilet asswipe

Post it, Duck..

 

R.Suave » 08 Mar 2024, 8:42 am » wrote: ↑

08 Mar 2024, 8:42 am

The labor market showed resiliency in February, adding 275,000 jobs, a sign that economic growth is still solid.

https://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/03/08 ... ry-economy

As Joementum continues to defy all efforts to contain it, they might have to call in 

I am guessing the article you did read also mentions the unemployment rate went up to 3.9, many were laid off, and the January numbers were revised downward. 

I didn't read your article because it is behind a payroll but I did post about this to you on this thread.  It is a lot for you to read at one time but give it a go. 

viewtopic.php?p=2514168#p2514168

The US economy created more new jobs than expected in February, while an increase in the unemployment rate for the first time in four months and downard revisions to job growth in prior months suggested signs of some softening in the US labor market.


 The US economy added 275,000 nonfarm payroll jobs in February, significantly more additions than the 200,000 expected by economists. Meanwhile, the unemployment rate increased to 3.9% from 3.7% in January.


Friday's report also brought revisions to the January reading. After an initially expected 353,000 jobs were added, revisions showed a more modest 229,000 nonfarm payroll job additions in the month.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/february ... idscIFFZ-Q

U.S.-based employers announced 84,638 cuts in February, up 3% from the 82,307 cuts announced one month prior. It is 9% higher than the 77,770 cuts announced in the same month in 2023, according to a report released Thursday from global outplacement and business and executive coaching firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas, Inc.
February’s total is the highest for the month since 2009, when 186,350 job cuts were announced in the second month of the year.So far this year, companies have announced plans to cut 166,945 jobs, down 7.6% from the 180,713 cuts announced in January and February last year. With the exclusion of the first two months of last year, it is the highest January through February total since 2009 which saw 428,099 cuts announced during the first two months of the year.


“As we navigate the start of 2024, we’re witnessing a persistent wave of layoffs. Businesses are aggressively slashing costs and embracing technological innovations, actions that are significantly reshaping staffing needs,” stated Andrew Challenger, labor and workplace expert and Senior Vice President of Challenger, Gray & Christmas, Inc.
https://www.challengergray.com/blog/job ... last-year/

I guess idiots like you are celebrating.  
 
 

R.Suave » 08 Mar 2024, 9:50 am » wrote: ↑

08 Mar 2024, 9:50 am

Post it, Duck..

3.9% asswipe

Huey » 08 Mar 2024, 9:55 am » wrote: ↑

08 Mar 2024, 9:55 am

I am guessing the article you did read also mentions the unemployment rate went up to 3.9, many were laid off, and the January numbers were revised downward. 

I didn't read your article because it is behind a payroll but I did post about this to you on this thread.  It is a lot for you to read at one time but give it a go. 

viewtopic.php?p=2514168#p2514168

The US economy created more new jobs than expected in February, while an increase in the unemployment rate for the first time in four months and downard revisions to job growth in prior months suggested signs of some softening in the US labor market.

 The US economy added 275,000 nonfarm payroll jobs in February, significantly more additions than the 200,000 expected by economists. Meanwhile, the unemployment rate increased to 3.9% from 3.7% in January.

Friday's report also brought revisions to the January reading. After an initially expected 353,000 jobs were added, revisions showed a more modest 229,000 nonfarm payroll job additions in the month.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/february ... idscIFFZ-Q

U.S.-based employers announced 84,638 cuts in February, up 3% from the 82,307 cuts announced one month prior. It is 9% higher than the 77,770 cuts announced in the same month in 2023, according to a report released Thursday from global outplacement and business and executive coaching firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas, Inc.
February’s total is the highest for the month since 2009, when 186,350 job cuts were announced in the second month of the year.So far this year, companies have announced plans to cut 166,945 jobs, down 7.6% from the 180,713 cuts announced in January and February last year. With the exclusion of the first two months of last year, it is the highest January through February total since 2009 which saw 428,099 cuts announced during the first two months of the year.

“As we navigate the start of 2024, we’re witnessing a persistent wave of layoffs. Businesses are aggressively slashing costs and embracing technological innovations, actions that are significantly reshaping staffing needs,” stated Andrew Challenger, labor and workplace expert and Senior Vice President of Challenger, Gray & Christmas, Inc.
https://www.challengergray.com/blog/job ... last-year/

I guess idiots like you are celebrating.

Job Cuts Jump in February 2024; YTD Cuts Down 8% Over Last Year 
you missed...uhhhhh....the headline...

So, to be clear, 3.5.....do you consider this a bad report?

FJB » 08 Mar 2024, 9:57 am » wrote: ↑

08 Mar 2024, 9:57 am

3.9% asswipe

Extending Joementum's record of sub 4% U3.

 

Funny how suave doesn't understand

R.Suave » 08 Mar 2024, 9:59 am » wrote: ↑

08 Mar 2024, 9:59 am

Extending Joementum's record of sub 4% U3.

FJB IS DESTROYING THE USA

R.Suave » 08 Mar 2024, 8:42 am » wrote: ↑

08 Mar 2024, 8:42 am

The labor market showed resiliency in February, adding 275,000 jobs, a sign that economic growth is still solid.

https://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/03/08 ... ry-economy

As Joementum continues to defy all efforts to contain it, they might have to call in 

Some more nuggets from the jobs report:

• Nonfarm payrolls increased by 275,000 for the month while the jobless rate moved higher to 3.9%. Wall Street had been looking for 198,000 new jobs and unemployment at 3.7%.
• Downward revisions to December and January reduced initial estimates by 167,000 jobs.
• Wages rose just 0.1% on the month, one-tenth of a percentage point below the estimate, and were up 4.3% from a year ago.
• Health care led with 67,000 new jobs. Government again was a big contributor, with 52,000, while restaurants and bars added 42,000.

February was a step higher in growth from January, which saw a steep downward revision to 229,000, from the initially reported 353,000. Job growth in December also was revised down to 290,000 from 333,000, bringing the two-month total to 167,000 fewer jobs than initially reported.

The jobless level increased as the household survey, used to calculate the unemployment rate, showed a decline of 184,000 in those employed. The increase came even though the labor force participation rate held steady at 62.5%, though the “prime age” rate increased to 83.5%, up two-tenths of a percentage point. The survey of establishments shows the total number of jobs.

https://www.cnbc.com/2024/03/08/jobs-re ... 75000.html
 

R.Suave » 08 Mar 2024, 8:42 am » wrote: ↑

08 Mar 2024, 8:42 am

The labor market showed resiliency in February, adding 275,000 jobs, a sign that economic growth is still solid.

https://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/03/08 ... ry-economy

As Joementum continues to defy all efforts to contain it, they might have to call in 

Darn, lots of part time jobs:

Job creation skewed toward part-time positions. Full-time jobs decreased by 187,000 while part-time employment rose by 51,000, according to the household survey. An alternative jobless measure, sometimes called the “real” unemployment rate, that includes discouraged workers and those holding part-time jobs for economic reasons rose slightly to 7.3%.

IBID​​​​​​​

Huey » 08 Mar 2024, 4:16 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Mar 2024, 4:16 pm

Some more nuggets from the jobs report:

• Nonfarm payrolls increased by 275,000 for the month while the jobless rate moved higher to 3.9%. Wall Street had been looking for 198,000 new jobs and unemployment at 3.7%.
• Downward revisions to December and January reduced initial estimates by 167,000 jobs.
• Wages rose just 0.1% on the month, one-tenth of a percentage point below the estimate, and were up 4.3% from a year ago.
• Health care led with 67,000 new jobs. Government again was a big contributor, with 52,000, while restaurants and bars added 42,000.

February was a step higher in growth from January, which saw a steep downward revision to 229,000, from the initially reported 353,000. Job growth in December also was revised down to 290,000 from 333,000, bringing the two-month total to 167,000 fewer jobs than initially reported.

The jobless level increased as the household survey, used to calculate the unemployment rate, showed a decline of 184,000 in those employed. The increase came even though the labor force participation rate held steady at 62.5%, though the “prime age” rate increased to 83.5%, up two-tenths of a percentage point. The survey of establishments shows the total number of jobs.

https://www.cnbc.com/2024/03/08/jobs-re ... 75000.html

The jobless level increased as the household survey, used to calculate the unemployment rate, showed


why is the Household Survey NOT used to establish nominal payroll?

B'bye!

R.Suave » 08 Mar 2024, 4:53 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Mar 2024, 4:53 pm

The jobless level increased as the household survey, used to calculate the unemployment rate, showed

why is the Household Survey NOT used to establish nominal payroll?

B'bye!

Who's hiring all these government ***-wipes, Buckwheat?