Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Suave's CNN "poll"....529 people via text they recruited BEFORE Biden's speech..
Suave's CNN "poll"....529 people via text they recruited BEFORE Biden's speech..
By BooRadley
8 Mar 2024 8:26 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
8 Mar 2024 8:26 am
https://www.cnn.com/2024/03/08/politics ... index.html
The CNN poll was conducted by text message with 529 US adults who said they watched the State of the Union on Thursday, and are representative of the views of speech-watchers only. Respondents were recruited to participate before the speech, and were selected by a survey of members of the SSRS Opinion Panel, a nationally representative panel recruited using probability-based sampling techniques. Results for the full sample of speech-watchers have a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 5.6 percentage points.
The CNN poll was conducted by text message with 529 US adults who said they watched the State of the Union on Thursday, and are representative of the views of speech-watchers only. Respondents were recruited to participate before the speech, and were selected by a survey of members of the SSRS Opinion Panel, a nationally representative panel recruited using probability-based sampling techniques. Results for the full sample of speech-watchers have a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 5.6 percentage points.
8 Mar 2024 8:33 am
529 people - what an ENORMOUS sample!BooRadley » 08 Mar 2024, 9:26 am » wrote: ↑ https://www.cnn.com/2024/03/08/politics ... index.html
The CNN poll was conducted by text message with 529 US adults who said they watched the State of the Union on Thursday, and are representative of the views of speech-watchers only. Respondents were recruited to participate before the speech, and were selected by a survey of members of the SSRS Opinion Panel, a nationally representative panel recruited using probability-based sampling techniques. Results for the full sample of speech-watchers have a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 5.6 percentage points.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
8 Mar 2024 8:40 am
330 million people...
And CNN finds 529 via text that says they favor Biden 6-4?
8 Mar 2024 8:41 am
SOMEONE has to produce the moron fodder.BooRadley » 08 Mar 2024, 9:40 am » wrote: ↑ 330 million people...
And CNN finds 529 via text that says they favor Biden 6-4?
CNN has been in that business since the first gulf war.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
8 Mar 2024 8:49 am
As if CNN has anyone else on their polling list that AREN'T far-left loons who remain gullible enough to still love Biden despite his long list of failures!BooRadley » 08 Mar 2024, 9:40 am » wrote: ↑ 330 million people...
And CNN finds 529 via text that says they favor Biden 6-4?
Know the number I'd like to see?
How many people had to turn on the closed-caption feature on their TV like I did in order to understand the yammering gibberish he mumbled so incoherently?
8 Mar 2024 8:55 am
I tried watching it on YouTube this morning and it was comparable to a two year learning to talk.Zeets2 » 08 Mar 2024, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑ As if CNN has anyone else on their polling list that AREN'T far-left loons who remain gullible enough to still love Biden despite his long list of failures!
Know the number I'd like to see?
How many people had to turn on the closed-caption feature on their TV like I did in order to understand the yammering gibberish he mumbled so incoherently?
When I lost hope I gained my freedom
8 Mar 2024 10:27 am
Like it wasn't tough enough watchin our idiot VP jumping up and down after every Biden sound bite like a freaking wack-a-mole!Hank » 08 Mar 2024, 9:55 am » wrote: ↑ I tried watching it on YouTube this morning and it was comparable to a two year learning to talk.
8 Mar 2024 12:14 pm
No...BooRadley » 08 Mar 2024, 9:40 am » wrote: ↑ 330 million people...
And CNN finds 529 via text that says they favor Biden 6-4?
317.4 - 211.6.
330 million didn't watch, Hole.
Some percentage did.
A statistically relevant sample size was calculated given assumptions about viewership.
This stuff is way over your head.
8 Mar 2024 12:18 pm
BooRadley » 08 Mar 2024, 9:26 am » wrote: ↑ https://www.cnn.com/2024/03/08/politics ... index.html
The CNN poll was conducted by text message with 529 US adults who said they watched the State of the Union on Thursday, and are representative of the views of speech-watchers only. Respondents were recruited to participate before the speech, and were selected by a survey of members of the SSRS Opinion Panel, a nationally representative panel recruited using probability-based sampling techniques. Results for the full sample of speech-watchers have a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 5.6 percentage points.
Veghead loves CNN and Bloomberg because of this reason. He knows what a bunch of corrupt liars that they are. That's right up his ally. You better get prepared for his 4k questions and him pretending that he knows anything at all about how statistics work.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
8 Mar 2024 12:21 pm
Then you do it.Vegas » 08 Mar 2024, 1:18 pm » wrote: ↑
You better get prepared for his 4k questions and him pretending that he knows anything at all about how statistics work.
8 Mar 2024 12:34 pm
529 people....and they were chosen by CNN ahead of time.R.Suave » 08 Mar 2024, 1:14 pm » wrote: ↑ No...
317.4 - 211.6.
330 million didn't watch, Hole.
Some percentage did.
A statistically relevant sample size was calculated given assumptions about viewership.
This stuff is way over your head.
529 people represent the US
???
We have more people in the House and Senate
8 Mar 2024 12:37 pm
No...by the polling company.BooRadley » 08 Mar 2024, 1:34 pm » wrote: ↑ 529 people....and they were chosen by CNN ahead of time.
529 people represent the US
???
We have more people in the House and Senate
You're far too stupid to be made to understand it....you're a life support system for holes.529 people represent the US
???
https://www.surveymonkey.com/mp/sample-size/
8 Mar 2024 12:41 pm
I like how they poll by text message ...R.Suave » 08 Mar 2024, 1:37 pm » wrote: ↑ No...by the polling company.
You're far too stupid to be made to understand it....you're a life support system for holes.
https://www.surveymonkey.com/mp/sample-size/
8 Mar 2024 12:42 pm
You're shamelessly stupid, Hole.
The typical sample size for a Gallup poll, either a traditional stand-alone poll or one night's interviewing from Gallup's Daily tracking, is 1,000 national adults with a margin of error of ±4 percentage points.
https://news.gallup.com/poll/101872/how ... -work.aspx
8 Mar 2024 12:50 pm
So your new defense is they normally poll twice as many people?R.Suave » 08 Mar 2024, 1:42 pm » wrote: ↑ You're shamelessly stupid, Hole.
The typical sample size for a Gallup poll, either a traditional stand-alone poll or one night's interviewing from Gallup's Daily tracking, is 1,000 national adults with a margin of error of ±4 percentage points.
https://news.gallup.com/poll/101872/how ... -work.aspx
WTF?
8 Mar 2024 12:56 pm
R.Suave » 08 Mar 2024, 1:14 pm » wrote: ↑ No...
317.4 - 211.6.
330 million didn't watch, Hole.
Some percentage did.
A statistically relevant sample size was calculated given assumptions about viewership.
This stuff is way over your head.
So what you are really saying is the reason the sample size is so small is because only a small amount watched it.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
8 Mar 2024 12:58 pm
Hole,BooRadley » 08 Mar 2024, 1:50 pm » wrote: ↑ So your new defense is they normally poll twice as many people?
WTF?
I will, once again, try to edify you...
But you really are unusually **** stupid and should probably be put down before you infect the rest of the herd.
So tell me, how many hours each day do you spend watching FOX?
8 Mar 2024 1:00 pm
No...the sample size isn't "small".Huey » 08 Mar 2024, 1:56 pm » wrote: ↑ So what you are really saying is the reason the sample size is so small is because only a small amount watched it.
But you are a moron.....and small.
8 Mar 2024 1:08 pm
R.Suave » 08 Mar 2024, 2:00 pm » wrote: ↑ No...the sample size isn't "small".
But you are a moron.....and small.
Online I tower over you. You don't tower over me in real or online.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
8 Mar 2024 1:08 pm
Many of these polls are self serving ..R.Suave » 08 Mar 2024, 2:00 pm » wrote: ↑ No...the sample size isn't "small".
But you are a moron.....and small.
So after 529 people they had a number 6 out of 10 approved of Biden..
And they could live with that ..
Who is online
In total there are 4154 users online :: 2 registered, 17 bots, and 4135 guests
Registered users: Squatchman, jerra b
Bots: Pinterest, DuckDuckGo, proximic, Bolt, ADmantX, CriteoBot, Adsbot, Firefox/7.0, YandexBot, Baiduspider, Yahoo! Slurp, Applebot, Not, Mediapartners-Google, curl/7, Googlebot, bingbot