Liberal Forum

BooRadley » 08 Mar 2024, 2:08 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Mar 2024, 2:08 pm

Many of these polls are self serving ..

So after 529 people they had a number 6 out of 10 approved of Biden..

And they could live with that ..

Hole,

When you cite polls, how many respondents in the samples? 
 

Huey » 08 Mar 2024, 2:08 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Mar 2024, 2:08 pm

Online I tower over you.  You don't tower over me in real or online.

 

You'd have to stand in place to establish that.


You run from everything.

R.Suave » 08 Mar 2024, 2:19 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Mar 2024, 2:19 pm

 

You'd have to stand in place to establish that.


You run from everything.

 

What is a PK in reference to a military post?  Read my sig.

Huey » 08 Mar 2024, 2:52 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Mar 2024, 2:52 pm

What is a PK in reference to a military post?  Read my sig.

Question.

Demand..

Gonna need that rule, Sheilagh..

 

R.Suave » 08 Mar 2024, 3:00 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Mar 2024, 3:00 pm

Question.

Demand..

Gonna need that rule, Sheilagh..

And he runs some more!  

Huey » 08 Mar 2024, 3:00 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Mar 2024, 3:00 pm

And he runs some more!

Sheilagh,

You've been invited to start a thread.

You're offering assertions implying some obligation on my part to indulge your diversion.

Post the rule.
 

R.Suave » 08 Mar 2024, 3:03 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Mar 2024, 3:03 pm

Sheilagh,

You've been invited to start a thread.

You're offering assertions implying some obligation on my part to indulge your diversion.

Post the rule.

No need.  Just click the link in my sig box and answer there, where you made the comment.

And by all means explain why we are all obligated to answer your questions and demands while you do not have to reciprocate.  

Huey » 08 Mar 2024, 3:04 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Mar 2024, 3:04 pm

No need.  Just click the link in my sig box and answer there, where you made the comment.

And by all means explain why we are all obligated to answer your questions and demands while you do not have to reciprocate.

Why do you run from the one distinction to which you can lay claim?

"No questions!"

It put you on the map..


And you always have reasons.

 

R.Suave » 08 Mar 2024, 1:14 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Mar 2024, 1:14 pm

No...

317.4 - 211.6.

330 million didn't watch, Hole.

Some percentage did.

A statistically relevant sample size was calculated given assumptions about viewership.

This stuff is way over your head.

Not as ricardo swayve, but as another character, you have a bad past with regard to statistics. 

On top of that, you've posted a large number of polls that have been debunked. 

I am no mathematorian, and I only know the basic rules of the statistarian sciences. If I were given a statistorial assignment that required GENERATING, rather than critiquing, I would be in waters deeper than my abilities to navigate. So I can only give my IMPRESSION in the matter.

My IMPRESSION is that 529 people is probably a decent sample. I am certainly in no position to call **** on the poll. I definitely feel the pretender performed far above expectations/apprehensions. And he didn't molest anyone on camera in his customary creepy, space invading, dirty uncle routine - always a relief. I certainly give the doctors high marks for their achievement with the diaper dandy. He carried the day - I mean, for a western leader of advanced years and minimal accomplishments beyond jailing a generation of ****** and putting up a good fight against school bussing in sunnier times. Oh - and making the biggest number of racially insulting gaffs of any practicing politician. 

If he were leading a nation in its ascendancy, his performance would have been a disaster. But for the carnival ride we call clown-show empire devolution, he was quite adequate - again, FAR above expectations by the right and apprehensions by the left.

If you tell us that YOU did not breathe a sigh of relief at his performance, then you're being true to your through line of being one of the lyingest sons of bitches on the board, swayve. And that's quite an accomplishment on this ship of foils. 
 
 

Zeets2 » 08 Mar 2024, 11:27 am » wrote: ↑

08 Mar 2024, 11:27 am

Like it wasn't tough enough watchin our idiot VP jumping up and down after every Biden sound bite like a freaking wack-a-mole!

She did what she was told to do. Act as if you have over whelming support for your president . 

Were the CNN Viewers given discount coupons at the Dope Dispensaries and HIV Clinics...?

Cannonpointer » 08 Mar 2024, 9:09 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Mar 2024, 9:09 pm

Not as ricardo swayve, but as another character, you have a bad past with regard to statistics. 

On top of that, you've posted a large number of polls that have been debunked. 

I am no mathematorian, and I only know the basic rules of the statistarian sciences. If I were given a statistorial assignment that required GENERATING, rather than critiquing, I would be in waters deeper than my abilities to navigate. So I can only give my IMPRESSION in the matter.

My IMPRESSION is that 529 people is probably a decent sample. I am certainly in no position to call **** on the poll. I definitely feel the pretender performed far above expectations/apprehensions. And he didn't molest anyone on camera in his customary creepy, space invading, dirty uncle routine - always a relief. I certainly give the doctors high marks for their achievement with the diaper dandy. He carried the day - I mean, for a western leader of advanced years and minimal accomplishments beyond jailing a generation of ****** and putting up a good fight against school bussing in sunnier times. Oh - and making the biggest number of racially insulting gaffs of any practicing politician. 

If he were leading a nation in its ascendancy, his performance would have been a disaster. But for the carnival ride we call clown-show empire devolution, he was quite adequate - again, FAR above expectations by the right and apprehensions by the left.

If you tell us that YOU did not breathe a sigh of relief at his performance, then you're being true to your through line of being one of the lyingest sons of bitches on the board, swayve. And that's quite an accomplishment on this ship of foils.

From a statistics POV 529 sample size is more than sufficient. 

You could even do it with something like 200 people (with higher margin of error of course).

The issue is not the methodology used - it’s whether the numbers were calculated and presented with honest intent. 

Cannonpointer » 08 Mar 2024, 9:09 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Mar 2024, 9:09 pm

Not as ricardo swayve, but as another character, you have a bad past with regard to statistics. 

On top of that, you've posted a large number of polls that have been debunked. 

I am no mathematorian, and I only know the basic rules of the statistarian sciences. If I were given a statistorial assignment that required GENERATING, rather than critiquing, I would be in waters deeper than my abilities to navigate. So I can only give my IMPRESSION in the matter.

My IMPRESSION is that 529 people is probably a decent sample. I am certainly in no position to call **** on the poll. I definitely feel the pretender performed far above expectations/apprehensions. And he didn't molest anyone on camera in his customary creepy, space invading, dirty uncle routine - always a relief. I certainly give the doctors high marks for their achievement with the diaper dandy. He carried the day - I mean, for a western leader of advanced years and minimal accomplishments beyond jailing a generation of ****** and putting up a good fight against school bussing in sunnier times. Oh - and making the biggest number of racially insulting gaffs of any practicing politician. 

If he were leading a nation in its ascendancy, his performance would have been a disaster. But for the carnival ride we call clown-show empire devolution, he was quite adequate - again, FAR above expectations by the right and apprehensions by the left.

If you tell us that YOU did not breathe a sigh of relief at his performance, then you're being true to your through line of being one of the lyingest sons of bitches on the board, swayve. And that's quite an accomplishment on this ship of foils.

Not as ricardo swayve, but as another character, you have a bad past with regard to statistics. 

From this  bit of fiction is born yet another legund...

BooRadley » 08 Mar 2024, 9:40 am » wrote: ↑

08 Mar 2024, 9:40 am

330 million people...

And CNN finds 529 via text that says they favor Biden 6-4?


 

What was that margin of error again? 11.2% 5.6 for each side of the 6 to 4. which kind of balances it out. Figures lie and liars figure facts mean more than ancestral results evolving is self evident 100% of the time.

BooRadley » 08 Mar 2024, 1:34 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Mar 2024, 1:34 pm

529 people....and they were chosen by CNN ahead of time.

529 people represent the US
???

We have more people in the House and Senate

That's like taking a crumb the size of a speck of fly **** of your favorite pie and saying the pie was good...  
 

ROG62 » 09 Mar 2024, 7:31 am » wrote: ↑

09 Mar 2024, 7:31 am

That's like taking a crumb the size of a speck of fly **** of your favorite pie and saying the pie was good...

Well...
Suave says that represents America 
 

Hank » 09 Mar 2024, 1:30 am » wrote: ↑

09 Mar 2024, 1:30 am

She did what she was told to do. Act as if you have over whelming support for your president .

No doubt!  It's also self-preservation for her, with Biden as her only meal ticket.
She knows if Biden gets dumped by the DNC, she'll have to return to the life of the ignorant slut she was before.
 

BooRadley » 09 Mar 2024, 7:49 am » wrote: ↑

09 Mar 2024, 7:49 am

Well...
Suave says that represents America 
 

In the current state of mind, he isn't inaccurate. That is why he doesn't quit. Everyone debates possibilities life isn't self evidently limited to genetics eternally separated the specific numbers of reproductions occupying time now.

The core of corrupted absolute power of suggestion sustains the corrupted educating their last generation to protect and serve previous 4 generation gaps ideologies or else, end of time.

BooRadley » 09 Mar 2024, 7:49 am » wrote: ↑

09 Mar 2024, 7:49 am

Well...
Suave says that represents America

of course he do...it fits his narrative...  
 

LowIQTrash » 09 Mar 2024, 4:01 am » wrote: ↑

09 Mar 2024, 4:01 am

From a statistics POV 529 sample size is more than sufficient. 

You could even do it with something like 200 people (with higher margin of error of course).

The issue is not the methodology used - it’s whether the numbers were calculated and presented with honest intent.

That was precisely my read. It could be done right with that number - but was it.

The source...