Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Chick-fil-a: Paragon of MAGA virtue!
Chick-fil-a: Paragon of MAGA virtue!
By maineman
12 Mar 2024 3:10 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
15 Mar 2024 10:48 am
Ok, is she in an open relationship?
15 Mar 2024 10:50 am
no. solely exclusive.
15 Mar 2024 10:52 am
Are you sure? Let me ax her she could be embarrassed for you to find out they like to swing
15 Mar 2024 10:52 am
So you are accusing chick fil a of being democrat?maineman » 12 Mar 2024, 3:10 pm » wrote: ↑ https://www.theintelligencer.net/news/c ... ppearance/
Chick-fil-a owner from Ohio drives over 400 miles from Belmont, OH to Rowan County, NC for the sole purpose of **** a 15 year old girl.
#MAGA!!!!
15 Mar 2024 11:04 am
clearly they are not. but some MAGA morons are indeed pedophiles... I would not be surprised if I found out a whole lot of them were, actually.
15 Mar 2024 11:05 am
BuckNaked » 15 Mar 2024, 10:52 am » wrote: ↑ Are you sure? Let me ax her she could be embarrassed for you to find out they like to swing
no thanks
15 Mar 2024 11:15 am
Keep in mind that maineman also claimed the Shelby NC police department took Dylann Roof to Burger King after his arrest to celebrate his killing a church full of black people too.
He said they got him the little paper hat and everything.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
15 Mar 2024 4:37 pm
1) "a baby" good grief, not a pre teen who wrote about it in her personal diary...maineman » 15 Mar 2024, 10:13 am » wrote: ↑ 1. I have showered with my daughter... my wife and I would both bring her into the shower when she was a baby. She loved it.
2. unproven scurrilous allegations
3. harmless avuncular gestures of affection
4. but it doesn't stop you from slandering him apparently
A jury found that Trump had sexually abused AND defamed Carroll. pretty cut and dried. That's your guy.
2) of course it was "unproven"... just like Carroll's...
3) many see it as **** creepy, including the parents holding the children...
4) no "slander" needed...
it's a **** civil case of he said, she said where NO ONE remembers dates, time, etc, etc, etc...IOW, circumstantial...which is why no prosecutor would touch it with a million mile pole...
read your argument...you really suck at this...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom 
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
15 Mar 2024 7:53 pm
ROG62 » 15 Mar 2024, 4:37 pm » wrote: ↑ 1) "a baby" good grief, not a pre teen who wrote about it in her personal diary...
2) of course it was "unproven"... just like Carroll's...
3) many see it as **** creepy, including the parents holding the children...
4) no "slander" needed...
it's a **** civil case of he said, she said where NO ONE remembers dates, time, etc, etc, etc...IOW, circumstantial...which is why no prosecutor would touch it with a million mile pole...
read your argument...you really suck at this...
the burden of proof in a civil case is different, but a jury of his peers found the testimony of Carroll and a dozen or so other witnesses to be compelling. You would not have wavered in your support for the clown even if she had kept the proverbial cum stained blue dress
And Rog.... listen pal... telling your opponent in an argument that they really suck at arguing is... well it's just weak and sophomoric.
16 Mar 2024 5:41 am
What's weak is your understanding of the word "peers" and your misunderstanding of the word "compelling"......you graduate from a government school or something?maineman » 15 Mar 2024, 7:53 pm » wrote: ↑ the burden of proof in a civil case is different, but a jury of his peers found the testimony of Carroll and a dozen or so other witnesses to be compelling. You would not have wavered in your support for the clown even if she had kept the proverbial cum stained blue dress
And Rog.... listen pal... telling your opponent in an argument that they really suck at arguing is... well it's just weak and sophomoric.
16 Mar 2024 6:37 am
16 Mar 2024 6:38 am
Buck Naked did your sister.
16 Mar 2024 6:43 am
And you're the clown that walks around with a loaded gun in case you run into MAGAs.
Any idea how dumb you sound?
16 Mar 2024 7:13 am
Actually from recent events it isn't a bad idea.BooRadley » 16 Mar 2024, 6:43 am » wrote: ↑ And you're the clown that walks around with a loaded gun in case you run into MAGAts.
Any idea how dumb you sound?
2 MAGAts just went to prison for furnishing the gun to their baby MAGAt that he shot up a school with.
Court findings show that their "conservative family values" were infidelity,drugs and child neglect.
So yeah. When I see a MAGA hat I watch them as closely as I would any other demographic that's prone to violence. The Crips,Bloods, Proud Boys,3 percenters or MS13 They're all cut from the same cloth.
16 Mar 2024 7:33 am
16 Mar 2024 7:38 am
There's a rumor that the white evangelists **** these chickens to death before turning them into sandwiches.
Kind of believable actually when you consider most support trump.
Kind of believable actually when you consider most support trump.
16 Mar 2024 7:52 am
So you admit you carry a loaded gun around because you fear Magas?Squatchman » 16 Mar 2024, 7:13 am » wrote: ↑ Actually from recent events it isn't a bad idea.
2 MAGAts just went to prison for furnishing the gun to their baby MAGAt that he shot up a school with.
Court findings show that their "conservative family values" were infidelity,drugs and child neglect.
So yeah. When I see a MAGA hat I watch them as closely as I would any other demographic that's prone to violence. The Crips,Bloods, Proud Boys,3 percenters or MS13 They're all cut from the same cloth.
16 Mar 2024 7:56 am
maineman » 15 Mar 2024, 7:53 pm » wrote: ↑ the burden of proof in a civil case is different, but a jury of his peers found the testimony of Carroll and a dozen or so other witnesses to be compelling. You would not have wavered in your support for the clown even if she had kept the proverbial cum stained blue dress
And Rog.... listen pal... telling your opponent in an argument that they really suck at arguing is... well it's just weak and sophomoric.
"jury of his peers"???
You mean a JURY POOL hand selected by the Plaintiff in a court with a PROVEN AND KNOWN LWNJ judge and in a district where there is 95% TRUMP HATERS??? THAT "jury of Trump's peers"?? So you ADMIT the outcome would be different if a COURT of NEUTRAL JURORS that didn't hate Trump.
You should try harder ASSKISS and COCKSUCK!! You're DEBATING SKILLS are "freshmoric" as it comes.
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
16 Mar 2024 8:00 am
Exactly....Beekeeper » 16 Mar 2024, 7:56 am » wrote: ↑ "jury of his peers"???
You mean a JURY POOL hand selected by the Plaintiff in a court with a PROVEN AND KNOWN LWNJ judge and in a district where there is 95% TRUMP HATERS??? THAT "jury of Trump's peers"?? So you ADMIT the outcome would be different if a COURT of NEUTRAL JURORS that didn't hate Trump.
You should try harder ASSKISS and COCKSUCK!! You're DEBATING SKILLS are "freshmoric" as it comes.
And a woman who waited decades to report it....
And claimed she was raped by someone else too
And whose cat is named "vagina"
16 Mar 2024 8:01 am
RebelGator » 16 Mar 2024, 5:41 am » wrote: ↑ What's weak is your understanding of the word "peers" and your misunderstanding of the word "compelling"......you graduate from a government school or something?
voir dire gives the clown the opportunity to choose those peers. And what they found compelling doesn't need to be compelling to you. DId you take civics class?
And yes... I did graduate from a government school, a world-renowned one. Where did YOU get your AC&R training, Cletis?
Who is online
In total there are 6552 users online :: 5 registered, 14 bots, and 6533 guests
Bots: Bolt, CensysInspect, ADmantX, YandexBot, facebookexternalhit, CriteoBot, Googlebot, proximic, Applebot, curl/7, Mediapartners-Google, okhttp, bingbot, Baiduspider