Loudermilk said that censure or ethical sanctions could also be applied instead of prosecution, given the immunity that members of Congress often enjoy regarding their work due to the separation of powers under the U.S. Constitution.The House Republican leading the current review of security and intelligence failures during the 2021 Capitol riot put former lawmakers and staff on the now-defunct Democrat-run Jan. 6 committee on notice Wednesday that he may make referrals for criminal obstruction or House ethics violations.Rep. Barry Loudermilk, R-Ga,, the chairman of the House Administration Oversight Subcommittee, told Just the News he is frustrated that videotapes of interviews, transcripts and other evidence that Congress gathered under the prior Jan. 6 inquiry run by Democrats was deleted, destroyed, moved to other federal agencies or locked behind passwords that have not been recovered, and he believes some form of accountability is warranted.“As far as holding people accountable, yes, they should be,” Loudermilk said during an interview with Just the News, No Noise television show. “But I think that’s going to be a little ways down the road, because there is so much more information that we need to get. And we need to build not only this, to get the truth out to the American people, but see just how big this case potentially is for obstructing.”
Majik » 15 Mar 2024, 8:15 am » wrote: ↑ House Oversight Committee chairman Rep. Barry Loudermilk (R-GA) said Wednesday that he may refer members of the January 6 Committee to the Department of Justice for criminal prosecution for hiding and destroying documents.Loudermilk has been investigating the work of the January 6 Committee, and discovered last year that the Committee had destroyed documents and other records, despite being warned by then-incoming Speaker of the House Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) to preserve all of the evidence it had collected in months of investigations and closed-door testimony.He told John Solomon of JusttheNews.com that it was possible members of the committee could face prosecution:
Loudermilk said that censure or ethical sanctions could also be applied instead of prosecution, given the immunity that members of Congress often enjoy regarding their work due to the separation of powers under the U.S. Constitution.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024 ... osecution/
@R. Suave
@Bidencrimefamily
You and your party's false narrative is falling apart at the seams .....
No.
R.Suave » 15 Mar 2024, 9:06 am » wrote: ↑ No.
You were told....
And you're still being told...because you're susceptible.
The Cassidy shot is a dud, reliant on the eager credulity of those who averted their eyes when so ordered.
So is this.
“There are but two parties now, patriots and traitors.”
Linking Bidencrimefamily is tantamount to asking your lawn man to cut a tumor off your brain.Majik » 15 Mar 2024, 8:15 am » wrote: ↑ House Oversight Committee chairman Rep. Barry Loudermilk (R-GA) said Wednesday that he may refer members of the January 6 Committee to the Department of Justice for criminal prosecution for hiding and destroying documents.Loudermilk has been investigating the work of the January 6 Committee, and discovered last year that the Committee had destroyed documents and other records, despite being warned by then-incoming Speaker of the House Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) to preserve all of the evidence it had collected in months of investigations and closed-door testimony.He told John Solomon of JusttheNews.com that it was possible members of the committee could face prosecution:
Loudermilk said that censure or ethical sanctions could also be applied instead of prosecution, given the immunity that members of Congress often enjoy regarding their work due to the separation of powers under the U.S. Constitution.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024 ... osecution/
@R. Suave
@Bidencrimefamily
You and your party's false narrative is falling apart at the seams .....
The only currency you and your pathetic party have left is **** and lies....R.Suave » 15 Mar 2024, 9:06 am » wrote: ↑ No.
You were told....
And you're still being told...because you're susceptible.
The Cassidy shot is a dud, reliant on the eager credulity of those who averted their eyes when so ordered.
So is this.
The only thing he and Rico has left is denial ...RebelGator » 15 Mar 2024, 9:28 am » wrote: ↑ Linking Bidencrimefamily is tantamount to asking your lawn man to cut a tumor off your brain.
Rico's favorite response to something he doesn't want to hear is "nuh uh!".
LOL!RedheadedStranger » 15 Mar 2024, 10:08 am » wrote: ↑ Rico's favorite response to something he doesn't want to hear is "nuh uh!".
He learned that debate tactic at Brown.
Huey » 15 Mar 2024, 10:12 am » wrote: ↑ LOL!
I understand he loves alumni weekend where he doesn't say "nuh uh!"
Nearly 40% of Brown University students identify as LGBTQ+
The number of Brown University students identifying as LGBTQ+ has doubled since 2010, according to a new poll from the university’s student paper, writes Alex Oliveira for the New York Post.
About 38% of students at the Ivy League school identified as either homosexual, bisexual, queer, asexual, pansexual, questioning, or other — more than five times the national rate for adults not identifying as straight.
https://www.universityworldnews.com/pos ... 20straight.
R.Suave » 15 Mar 2024, 9:06 am » wrote: ↑ No.
You were told....
And you're still being told...because you're susceptible.
The Cassidy shot is a dud, reliant on the eager credulity of those who averted their eyes when so ordered.
So is this.
Lol.nefarious101 » 15 Mar 2024, 10:55 am » wrote: ↑ Hey Dickhead number 1...
you never did answer my question.........why did you chose a the name of a cheap shampoo brand as your screen name?
Majik » 15 Mar 2024, 11:01 am » wrote: ↑ Lol.
but Rico is a narcissist .....
and this is probably why he chose the name .....it also dates him ...
Rico Suave, which could roughly translate from Spanish as “rich and smooth,” first gained widespread popularity in the US in 1991 with the release of Gerardo Mejía's wildly popular Spanish-English rap song, “Rico Suave.” The lyrics describe a smooth-talking Latino womanizer, which is possibly the source of the ...Mar 1, 2018
You didn't see a minute of it that wasn't curated for effect..
Since you're making an issue of it, where did you learn your tactics?RedheadedStranger » 15 Mar 2024, 10:08 am » wrote: ↑ Rico's favorite response to something he doesn't want to hear is "nuh uh!".
He learned that debate tactic at Brown.
What you watched was a staged production .....R.Suave » 15 Mar 2024, 11:34 am » wrote: ↑ You didn't see a minute of it that wasn't curated for effect..
I watched it live.
Beware seams and seems as the two are not related except every reality is a fabricated truth defying the natural process of evolving as displaced.Majik » 15 Mar 2024, 8:15 am » wrote: ↑ House Oversight Committee chairman Rep. Barry Loudermilk (R-GA) said Wednesday that he may refer members of the January 6 Committee to the Department of Justice for criminal prosecution for hiding and destroying documents.Loudermilk has been investigating the work of the January 6 Committee, and discovered last year that the Committee had destroyed documents and other records, despite being warned by then-incoming Speaker of the House Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) to preserve all of the evidence it had collected in months of investigations and closed-door testimony.He told John Solomon of JusttheNews.com that it was possible members of the committee could face prosecution:
Loudermilk said that censure or ethical sanctions could also be applied instead of prosecution, given the immunity that members of Congress often enjoy regarding their work due to the separation of powers under the U.S. Constitution.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024 ... osecution/
@R. Suave
@Bidencrimefamily
You and your party's false narrative is falling apart at the seams .....