Liberal Forum

golfboy » 16 Mar 2024, 10:42 am » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2024, 10:42 am

Nothing would ever happen because this DoJ is corrupt and doesn't prosecute Democrats or anti-Trump "Republicans" who work with them. 
But it would be hilarious to see Schiff referred for prosecution during his campaign for Senate in California.

For what should "they" be prosecuted.

R.Suave » 16 Mar 2024, 10:21 am » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2024, 10:21 am

What "movie", Usefool?

You just linked to your own ******* regurgitation

The Hollywood/Dem  production that failed to manipulate most of America ...except for braindead easily manipulated Leftist idiots like you.
IT FAILED MISERABLY ....
Because the whole point of this production was to gaslight America against Donald Trump and it failed .....
and of course it was going to fail ....The country could smell the treachery of this commitee even before it started .
So, let's recap ....
Your party's treachery against Trump and America is failing .....
Hell, your lawfare against him is failing ....and will not stop him ....
And the funny part is all of this treachery by your partyto try and stop Trump has turned America against you and your party .....because they now realize that your party is corrupt and is undemocratic which threatens Democracy ......







 

GHETTOBLASTER » 16 Mar 2024, 11:11 am » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2024, 11:11 am

It's easy to see why if you ever watch CNN or MSNBC for 5 minutes...that's all you will see are 1/2 truths, 1/4 truths and all out lies .
They even had famous negro hoax monkey,  Al Sharpton as an ANCHOR MAN at one time.....  
That Serial Liar was THE VOICE OF THE DEMOCRAT PARTY
https://www.newsweek.com/tawana-brawley ... pe-1451599

Yep, and let's not forget all of those anti-Trump  swamp creatures they hired .....That have now failed to stop Trump with their gaslighting .....

​​​​​​
 

R.Suave » 16 Mar 2024, 11:17 am » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2024, 11:17 am

an exceptional job of making it watchable.

But you averted your eyes as told.

Nobody averted their eyes impy....
I watched it and knew instantly it was a fraudulent production .....whose only goal was to slander Trump.
and it failed ....
And you are to frightened  to ask the important question of "Why"..???
And instead of asking why .....you fell for the fraud ....
Nod, Vigorously asshole.

Majik » 16 Mar 2024, 11:47 am » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2024, 11:47 am

Nobody averted their eyes impy....
I watched it and knew instantly it was a fraudulent production .....whose only goal was to slander Trump.
and it failed ....
And you are to frightened  to ask the important question of "Why"..???
And instead of asking why .....you fell for the fraud ....
Nod, Vigorously asshole.

You're lying.

You didn't watch any of it.

You have zero credibility.
 

R.Suave » 16 Mar 2024, 11:55 am » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2024, 11:55 am

You're lying.

You didn't watch any of it.

You have zero credibility.

It's you that has no credibility for even attempting to use this tired old tactic above ^^^^^^
You claim none of us watched it .....
While I admit I didn't watch every single second of it .....I did watch quite a bit of it .....
also the Commitee lacked credibility from the get go because of the lack of impartiality .....
Those 8 commitee members all were proven Trump haters years before Jan.6th....
That should have been your first clue it lacked any credibility. ...
But you being a Trump hater yourself made you an easy mark for their Hollywood production.
And that's something you can never deny because here you are   defending their fraud like their good little lapdog .....




 

Majik » 16 Mar 2024, 12:25 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2024, 12:25 pm

It's you that has no credibility for even attempting to use this tired old tactic above ^^^^^^
You claim none of us watched it .....
While I admit I didn't watch every single second of it .....I did watch quite a bit of it .....
also the Commitee lacked credibility from the get go because of the lack of impartiality .....
Those 8 commitee members all were proven Trump haters years before Jan.6th....
That should have been your first clue it lacked any credibility. ...
But you being a Trump hater yourself made you an easy mark for their Hollywood production.
And that's something you can never deny because here you are   defending their fraud like their good little lapdog .....

You're full of ****.

Spare me
.
 

R.Suave » 16 Mar 2024, 12:35 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2024, 12:35 pm

You're full of ****.

Spare me
.

Actually, he is correct.  Anti Trumpers were chosen to fill the spots that the dems kicked off the committee.   You had two anti trumpets.  You are full of ****.  Spare me your rah rah cheerleading.

If things like this turn out to be true, you're ****:

Jan. 6 Committee Hid Trump-Exonerating Evidence  

• Former Rep. Liz Cheney and the January 6 Committee suppressed evidence showing President Trump urged for 10,000 National Guard troops to protect the Capitol.
• The transcripts revealed that White House wanted to ensure enough guards and even President Trump suggested having 10,000 troops present before the riots.
• Deputy Chief of Staff Anthony Ornato stated that a slow deployment of assistance by Acting Secretary of Defense on January 6 was a concern for the White House.

 
 

Democrat politicians and deep state Dems like Struct and Page and 100% behind the Jan. 6 setup to get Trump and his supporters.

R.Suave » 16 Mar 2024, 12:35 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2024, 12:35 pm

You're full of ****.

Spare me
.

Your response above is irrelevant ....


 

Huey » 16 Mar 2024, 12:45 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2024, 12:45 pm

Actually, he is correct.  Anti Trumpers were chosen to fill the spots that the dems kicked off the committee.   You had two anti trumpets.  You are full of ****.  Spare me your rah rah cheerleading.

If things like this turn out to be true, you're ****:

Jan. 6 Committee Hid Trump-Exonerating Evidence  

• Former Rep. Liz Cheney and the January 6 Committee suppressed evidence showing President Trump urged for 10,000 National Guard troops to protect the Capitol.
• The transcripts revealed that White House wanted to ensure enough guards and even President Trump suggested having 10,000 troops present before the riots.
• Deputy Chief of Staff Anthony Ornato stated that a slow deployment of assistance by Acting Secretary of Defense on January 6 was a concern for the White House.

Very credible sources you got there...

"Low factuality"?

R. Suave » 16 Mar 2024, 11:19 am » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2024, 11:19 am

For what should "they" be prosecuted.

Embezzlement of other ancestries biological time adapting to the moment here. in your mind over matter mentality, FRAUD.

R.Suave » 16 Mar 2024, 11:19 am » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2024, 11:19 am

For what should "they" be prosecuted.

Shouldn't Joe be prosecuted for mishandling classified documents, and reading classified information to someone without clearance?
Shouldn't Hillary be prosecuted for destroying subpoenaed evidence?
Shouldn't Brennan be prosecuted for lying to Congress?

I could provide a long list, but you probably wouldn't read it anyway.
 

golfboy » 16 Mar 2024, 7:34 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2024, 7:34 pm

Shouldn't Joe be prosecuted for mishandling classified documents, and reading classified information to someone without clearance?
Shouldn't Hillary be prosecuted for destroying subpoenaed evidence?
Shouldn't Brennan be prosecuted for lying to Congress?

I could provide a long list, but you probably wouldn't read it anyway.
 

You let out denying it, denying it, denying it. Foundation of William jefferson Clinton's social behavior as a career politician. Oh Hillary and Chelsea following her parents example as well.

R.Suave » 16 Mar 2024, 3:25 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2024, 3:25 pm

Very credible sources you got there...

"Low factuality"?

It appears my post is correct.  Retardo Smarmy is an unable to refute it.  I accept your surrender.  Here is your L.



 
 

R. Suave » 16 Mar 2024, 3:25 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2024, 3:25 pm

Very credible sources you got there...

"Low factuality"?

where is your kinetic actuality for being one of a kind equally uniquely here now as any other resident of this atmosphere, this solar system, this galaxy, this universal moment?

Oly facts you recite are what people assumed reality for hundreds of generation gaps taking pride in not understanding self evident evolving here now.

Huey » 17 Mar 2024, 8:32 am » wrote: ↑

17 Mar 2024, 8:32 am

It appears my post is correct.  Retardo Smarmy is an unable to refute it.  I accept your surrender.  Here is your L.

Supported by sources of "low factuality".

"Winning"

R.Suave » 17 Mar 2024, 9:50 am » wrote: ↑

17 Mar 2024, 9:50 am

Supported by sources of "low factuality".

"Winning"

KILL YOURSELF
 

R.Suave » 17 Mar 2024, 9:50 am » wrote: ↑

17 Mar 2024, 9:50 am

Supported by sources of "low factuality".

"Winning"

Until you a show what part of my post is wrong, you lose.  

Don’t you think I knew what I was doing when I posted it, *******?  Too **** easy. 

POM » 17 Mar 2024, 9:52 am » wrote: ↑

17 Mar 2024, 9:52 am

KILL YOURSELF
 

The longer he stays in character, the faster his reality implodes taking down everyone else chanting his mantra. Your one track reality is stuck following the money trail, my brain follows chain of command to the core, every level of denying the same thing, every generation gap participating in self deception cradle to grave, every ideology supporting humanity governing last arrivals to obey previous 4 generation gap traditional values life isn't self evident.

And it always has been in spite of Intellectual Theories and Intellectual theologies defining facts starting with the words "If we try this?", What about they, them, those people not complying?" to our better way to keep everyone thinking life isn't self evident.

Lets play "the enemy of my enemy is my ally to eliminate anyone ever standing their time uniquely alive here now.".