"Russia Russia Russia!"R.Suave » 20 Mar 2024, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑ Lev Parnas, ex-Giuliani associate, testifies allegations against Bidens are false and 'spread by the Kremlin'
In his opening statement, Parnas maintained there is no evidence showing that Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden were linked to corruption in Ukraine.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/joe-bi ... rcna144250![]()
So, if there was no legitimate law enforcement objective served by the "Perfect Phone Call" to Zelensky, wouldn't this make Grifty the Useful Idiot of Russian Intelligence?
Perhaps his former National Security Advisor can shed some light on this...
“It’s not the personality that’s the problem. He doesn’t understand the job, particularly in the national security space,” former national security adviser John Bolton said on CNN. (He also advised, “I mean, if Trump is elected, there will be celebrations in the Kremlin, there’s no doubt about it, because [Vladimir] Putin thinks that he is an easy mark.”)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions ... sper-warn/
ouch!
No thoughts, etc..copy/paste.R.Suave » 20 Mar 2024, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑ Lev Parnas, ex-Giuliani associate, testifies allegations against Bidens are false and 'spread by the Kremlin'
In his opening statement, Parnas maintained there is no evidence showing that Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden were linked to corruption in Ukraine.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/joe-bi ... rcna144250
So, if there was no legitimate law enforcement objective served by the "Perfect Phone Call" to Zelensky, wouldn't this make Grifty the Useful Idiot of Russian Intelligence?
Perhaps his former National Security Advisor can shed some light on this...
“It’s not the personality that’s the problem. He doesn’t understand the job, particularly in the national security space,” former national security adviser John Bolton said on CNN. (He also advised, “I mean, if Trump is elected, there will be celebrations in the Kremlin, there’s no doubt about it, because [Vladimir] Putin thinks that he is an easy mark.”)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions ... sper-warn/
ouch!
You SHOULD be bitter...
You do know that Putin has publicly stated that he prefers Bidumb in the White House over Trump don't you?
It's much less about what they say than what they do....RedheadedStranger » 20 Mar 2024, 12:42 pm » wrote: ↑ You do know that Putin has publicly stated that he prefers Bidumb in the White House over Trump don't you?
I'm thinking not.
No evidence?R.Suave » 20 Mar 2024, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑ Lev Parnas, ex-Giuliani associate, testifies allegations against Bidens are false and 'spread by the Kremlin'
In his opening statement, Parnas maintained there is no evidence showing that Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden were linked to corruption in Ukraine.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/joe-bi ... rcna144250
So, if there was no legitimate law enforcement objective served by the "Perfect Phone Call" to Zelensky, wouldn't this make Grifty the Useful Idiot of Russian Intelligence?
Perhaps his former National Security Advisor can shed some light on this...
“It’s not the personality that’s the problem. He doesn’t understand the job, particularly in the national security space,” former national security adviser John Bolton said on CNN. (He also advised, “I mean, if Trump is elected, there will be celebrations in the Kremlin, there’s no doubt about it, because [Vladimir] Putin thinks that he is an easy mark.”)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions ... sper-warn/
ouch!
The vapid repetition of the left slogan 'no evidence' is becoming tedious.R.Suave » 20 Mar 2024, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑ Lev Parnas, ex-Giuliani associate, testifies allegations against Bidens are false and 'spread by the Kremlin'
In his opening statement, Parnas maintained there is no evidence showing that Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden were linked to corruption in Ukraine.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/joe-bi ... rcna144250
How aboutJustinSane » 01 Apr 2024, 8:09 am » wrote: ↑ The vapid repetition of the left slogan 'no evidence' is becoming tedious.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics ... r-AA1hwXfR
RebelGator » 01 Apr 2024, 6:38 am » wrote: ↑ No evidence?
I guess Biden’s video confession could not even penetrate thru the mass of ignorance ln your cranial wasteland.
You are one stupid Democrat.
I guess Biden’s video confession
R.Suave » 20 Mar 2024, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑ Lev Parnas, ex-Giuliani associate, testifies allegations against Bidens are false and 'spread by the Kremlin'
In his opening statement, Parnas maintained there is no evidence showing that Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden were linked to corruption in Ukraine.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/joe-bi ... rcna144250
So, if there was no legitimate law enforcement objective served by the "Perfect Phone Call" to Zelensky, wouldn't this make Grifty the Useful Idiot of Russian Intelligence?
Perhaps his former National Security Advisor can shed some light on this...
“It’s not the personality that’s the problem. He doesn’t understand the job, particularly in the national security space,” former national security adviser John Bolton said on CNN. (He also advised, “I mean, if Trump is elected, there will be celebrations in the Kremlin, there’s no doubt about it, because [Vladimir] Putin thinks that he is an easy mark.”)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions ... sper-warn/
ouch!
You're kind of a bitter twat...ConsRule » 01 Apr 2024, 8:48 am » wrote: ↑ Wow...you posted an Op-Ed with no original thoughts of your own. That is so unlike you.
Since the question wasn't directed to me, I didn't run from ****...you're just too stupid to understand that.R.Suave » 01 Apr 2024, 8:50 am » wrote: ↑ You're kind of a bitter twat...
So, if there was no legitimate law enforcement objective served by the "Perfect Phone Call" to Zelensky, wouldn't this make Grifty the Useful Idiot of Russian Intelligence?
Can you see the question, from which you ran, now?
Not really, no.. I think you may have missed the point. However you word it, it's demonstrably incorrect - as was demonstrated. That's what makes it a slogan
3 separate investigations found no evidence. Do you ever consider the possibility you're just wrong?