THEY MUST HAVE GOTTEN MICHAEL JACKSON MAKEOVERSLowIQTrash » 03 Apr 2024, 6:15 pm » wrote: ↑ A while back, years ago even, I pointed out the fraudulent nature of the unemployment and inflation rates.
Well there is a recent trend of fudging the CRIME numbers.
https://x.com/unbiasedcrime/status/1775 ... 94202?s=46
Dear friend - ""They"" fudge the numbers on everything to create citizen CUCKS.LowIQTrash » 03 Apr 2024, 6:15 pm » wrote: ↑ A while back, years ago even, I pointed out the fraudulent nature of the unemployment and inflation rates.
Well there is a recent trend of fudging the CRIME numbers.
https://x.com/unbiasedcrime/status/1775 ... 94202?s=46

Assuming you are indicting the Commerce Dept., is ADP also in on the scam?LowIQTrash » 03 Apr 2024, 6:15 pm » wrote: ↑ A while back, years ago even, I pointed out the fraudulent nature of the unemployment and inflation rates.
Well there is a recent trend of fudging the CRIME numbers.
https://x.com/unbiasedcrime/status/1775 ... 94202?s=46
You ESTAB Bois are in the pockets. Soulless automatons.R.Suave » 03 Apr 2024, 8:08 pm » wrote: ↑ Assuming you are indicting the Commerce Dept., is ADP also in on the scam?
What's in it for them?
LowIQTrash » 03 Apr 2024, 6:15 pm » wrote: ↑ A while back, years ago even, I pointed out the fraudulent nature of the unemployment and inflation rates.
Well there is a recent trend of fudging the CRIME numbers.
https://x.com/unbiasedcrime/status/1775 ... 94202?s=46

That's deep, citizen...
Its an easy game with you ESTAB CUCKS.
You should ask the C suite at ADP…maybe they will answer your question(s)?R.Suave » 03 Apr 2024, 8:08 pm » wrote: ↑ Assuming you are indicting the Commerce Dept., is ADP also in on the scam?
What's in it for them?
Nobody is fudging the numbers.LowIQTrash » 04 Apr 2024, 1:00 am » wrote: ↑ You should ask the C suite at ADP…maybe they will answer your question(s)?![]()
And here’s a question for you…what motivation would you attribute to the “people in charge” incontrovertibly fudging the stats regarding the perpetrators’ race?
That a republican ran stare for yeah.LowIQTrash » 03 Apr 2024, 6:15 pm » wrote: ↑ A while back, years ago even, I pointed out the fraudulent nature of the unemployment and inflation rates.
Well there is a recent trend of fudging the CRIME numbers.
https://x.com/unbiasedcrime/status/1775 ... 94202?s=46
In @R. Suave defense, he doesn’t actually think that…he merely ENJOYs employing his uniquely patented debate style of “hits and runs” and “persistent questions”…one of his passe temps…GHETTOBLASTER » 03 Apr 2024, 8:19 pm » wrote: ↑ Yep.
It appears that the [[[JWO]]] has done away with FBI / DOJ Table 43A too.
They first started **** with Table 43A back when Ooga Booga OBongo and Holder be in charge nsheet.
They decided to lump Hispanics in with Whites ...which would make White crime rate look 100% worse than it really is and of course make Chimp crime rate look not as horrible.
People whose entire belief systems are based on lies [like BV, MM, BCF] don't see anything wrong with lying about Chimp Crime.
They believe that crime tables sorted by race are racist and bogus because they have been brainwashed since birth to believe that ****** and spics are no more prone to violence than any other subspecies of man.
By the way, I just saw an EXCELLENT post explaining how “they” fudge the numbers.Sumela » 03 Apr 2024, 8:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Dear friend - ""They"" fudge the numbers on everything to create citizen CUCKS.
War
Crime
Economics
Enemies
Each side of the aisle MUST keep and maintain THEIR CUCKS.

Yeah they fudge everything. You can't believe anything. Even posts on X. Imagine thatLowIQTrash » 04 Apr 2024, 1:26 am » wrote: ↑ By the way, I just saw an EXCELLENT post explaining how “they” fudge the numbers.
See this:
The way “they” fudge numbers today is a DEEP rabbit hole. Some low ranking bureaucrat fudged the numbers slightly, and then the person above him/her does the same…and once it reaches the end (top) of the line you get COMPLETE POPPYCOCK! And since nobody will bother to investigate or “double check” who cares right?
The LAST president to report HONEST economic numbers was Jimmy Carter.
I have been alive for over 7 decades and there hasn't been a rotation of the planet I remained the same form as my fertilized cell so far. What did I learn humanity doesn't allow anyone to talk about socially here now?LowIQTrash » 03 Apr 2024, 6:15 pm » wrote: ↑ A while back, years ago even, I pointed out the fraudulent nature of the unemployment and inflation rates.
Well there is a recent trend of fudging the CRIME numbers.
https://x.com/unbiasedcrime/status/1775 ... 94202?s=46
Citizens are directed characters on a world stage serving intellectual caricatures of life in real time adapting as displaced reproductively displaced so far simply adapting to time never same results twice.Sumela » 03 Apr 2024, 8:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Dear friend - ""They"" fudge the numbers on everything to create citizen CUCKS.
War
Crime
Economics
Enemies
Each side of the aisle MUST keep and maintain THEIR CUCKS.
No payroll processing service...like ADP...does anything to see if one person appears on the payroll of more than one employer. If I recall correctly, that has long been the argument (against administrations for both parties) and the reason why jobs can be "created" and the labor participation rate remains virtually unchanged. Another issue is when minimum wage rates increases apply to employees working more than 30 hours a week. A small employer will cut the hours of existing employees to get them "below the limit" and hire a second part-time employee. That is counted as a job being created when it really isn't. The job already existed, there is now just two people sharing it...no more hours are being work.R.Suave » 03 Apr 2024, 8:08 pm » wrote: ↑ Assuming you are indicting the Commerce Dept., is ADP also in on the scam?
What's in it for them?
Was this different in the years of the Yugest Economy evah?ConsRule » 04 Apr 2024, 6:32 am » wrote: ↑ No payroll processing service...like ADP...does anything to see if one person appears on the payroll of more than one employer. If I recall correctly, that has long been the argument (against administrations for both parties) and the reason why jobs can be "created" and the labor participation rate remains virtually unchanged. Another issue is when minimum wage rates increases apply to employees working more than 30 hours a week. A small employer will cut the hours of existing employees to get them "below the limit" and hire a second part-time employee. That is counted as a job being created when it really isn't. The job already existed, there is now just two people sharing it...no more hours are being work.
Relative time theory doesn't honor natural time evolving. Never has since dawn of civilization.ConsRule » 04 Apr 2024, 6:32 am » wrote: ↑ No payroll processing service...like ADP...does anything to see if one person appears on the payroll of more than one employer. If I recall correctly, that has long been the argument (against administrations for both parties) and the reason why jobs can be "created" and the labor participation rate remains virtually unchanged. Another issue is when minimum wage rates increases apply to employees working more than 30 hours a week. A small employer will cut the hours of existing employees to get them "below the limit" and hire a second part-time employee. That is counted as a job being created when it really isn't. The job already existed, there is now just two people sharing it...no more hours are being work.
Don't presume.LowIQTrash » 04 Apr 2024, 1:16 am » wrote: ↑ In @R. Suave defense, he doesn’t actually think that…he merely ENJOYs employing his uniquely patented debate style of “hits and runs” and “persistent questions”…one of his passe temps…