NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!R.Suave » 03 Apr 2024, 8:08 pm » wrote: ↑ Assuming you are indicting the Commerce Dept., is ADP also in on the scam?
What's in it for them?
Did you see that word in my post?
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!R.Suave » 04 Apr 2024, 6:34 am » wrote: ↑ Was this different in the years of the Yugest Economy evah?
Just TRY answering the question asked.
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!R.Suave » 04 Apr 2024, 7:18 am » wrote: ↑ I want to be sure I'm fully understanding your intent before I address your breathing issues.
Are you referring to the Labor Force Participation Rate?
Don't mistake observing for presuming, ***.
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!R.Suave » 04 Apr 2024, 8:45 am » wrote: ↑
If so, to what "labor participation rate" are you referring?
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
Please stop issuing instructions and answer the perfectly reasonable question, whinyass bitch.ConsRule » 04 Apr 2024, 3:03 pm » wrote: ↑ We've been through this. Reread what I posted (not what you think I posted) and keep the original post in the proper context.
If your question had anything to do with the point of my original post, I would gladly answer it. Since the words you focused on and latched on to like a starving dog to a bone, I am moving on. I am going no further with you on you attempt to hijack yet another thread.R.Suave » 04 Apr 2024, 3:06 pm » wrote: ↑ Please stop issuing instructions and answer the perfectly reasonable question, whinyass bitch.
It can't possibly have more to do with it than asking you to define your term.ConsRule » 04 Apr 2024, 3:28 pm » wrote: ↑ If your question had anything to do with the point of my original post, I would gladly answer it. Since the words you focused on and latched on to like a starving dog to a bone, I am moving on. I am going no further with you on you attempt to hijack yet another thread.