I'M NOT SURE OF THE TYPE OF FORUM IT WAS, WHETHER SCHOOL OR CITY COUNCIL. I THOUGHT HER SPEECH WAS WELL WRITTENVegas » 03 Apr 2024, 9:33 pm » wrote: ↑ Was she talking to a liberal city council? If so, I am surprised they didn't cut off her mic. You know how lefties are.
she did a great job...righteous » 03 Apr 2024, 9:37 pm » wrote: ↑ I'M NOT SURE OF THE TYPE OF FORUM IT WAS, WHETHER SCHOOL OR CITY COUNCIL. I THOUGHT HER SPEECH WAS WELL WRITTEN
Yeah there was three people in that meeting.
Bidencrimefamily » 04 Apr 2024, 1:23 am » wrote: ↑ Yeah there was three people in that meeting.![]()
![]()
We the couple of idiots.
Let's examine who is the idiot. You stated "there was three people in that meeting". Since the photo shows 4 people sitting in the background, and she is speaking, that is five. If the meeting is of a body that follows parliamentary procedure, a quorum must be present...and since a quorum is generally considered a majority, we can assume the group she was addressing had at least three members (elected or appointed). That means at least 2 had to be present for them to conduct business. Now we are up to at least seven.Bidencrimefamily » 04 Apr 2024, 1:23 am » wrote: ↑ Yeah there was three people in that meeting.![]()
![]()
We the couple of idiots.
She swallowed and didn't bat an eye!
your mommy?
Not that it will register but it is a good one..Bidencrimefamily » 04 Apr 2024, 1:23 am » wrote: ↑ Yeah there was three people in that meeting.![]()
![]()
We the couple of idiots.

so you were in a meeting with two others? was the main topic your stupidity or mental midgetry?Bidencrimefamily » 04 Apr 2024, 1:23 am » wrote: ↑ Yeah there was three people in that meeting.![]()
![]()
We the couple of idiots.
everyone wearing a mask is icing on the cake...
"We the couple of idiots." is apparently a self reference...ConsRule » 04 Apr 2024, 10:12 am » wrote: ↑ Let's examine who is the idiot. You stated "there was three people in that meeting". Since the photo shows 4 people sitting in the background, and she is speaking, that is five. If the meeting is of a body that follows parliamentary procedure, a quorum must be present...and since a quorum is generally considered a majority, we can assume the group she was addressing had at least three members (elected or appointed). That means at least 2 had to be present for them to conduct business. Now we are up to at least seven.
This is where you whine for some reason. Please proceed.
One dumb bitch.
IMPOSSIBLE
