Hey buck- it would seriously be a national security threat. That's why. so Hur- said it politely as he could.
sootedupCyndi » 08 Apr 2024, 12:07 pm » wrote: ↑ Hey buck- it would seriously be a national security threat. That's why. so Hur- said it politely as he could.
Ha! at this point probably NO!BuckNaked » 08 Apr 2024, 12:15 pm » wrote: ↑ Well anyone surprised?
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/doj-wi ... ounsel-hur
The transcripts were read in the house hearings.BuckNaked » 08 Apr 2024, 8:34 am » wrote: ↑ Where’s the transparency?
Whats the issue with releasing them?
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/garlan ... t-congress
doj does not get to pick and choose oversight is oversight get on board and comply no one is above the law or are they?
All the law asks for is transcripts.BuckNaked » 09 Apr 2024, 1:10 pm » wrote: ↑ doj does not get to pick and choose oversight is oversight get on board and comply no one is above the law or are they?
Bidencrimefamily » 09 Apr 2024, 4:09 pm » wrote: ↑ All the law asks for is transcripts.
You dont know that?
Congress didn't request them.BuckNaked » 10 Apr 2024, 8:28 am » wrote: ↑ that’s not what congress requested separate branches of government for a reason
Squatchman » 10 Apr 2024, 9:59 am » wrote: ↑ Congress didn't request them.
Just 2 Qanon republicans did.
**** 'em.
They can read,right?
They can look at the transcripts.
Apparently you do better with pictures too.BuckNaked » 10 Apr 2024, 10:01 am » wrote: ↑ they are in position to provide oversight comply Mr attorney general you are not above the law
Squatchman » 10 Apr 2024, 10:04 am » wrote: ↑ Apparently you do better with pictures too.
Too bad.
You or they don't get to see these.
How much of the Jan 6th hearings did you watch?BuckNaked » 08 Apr 2024, 8:34 am » wrote: ↑ Where’s the transparency?
Whats the issue with releasing them?
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/garlan ... t-congress