Household Survey Hustle....*rippy38 » 11 Apr 2024, 6:41 am » wrote: ↑ Just as many of us have been saying all along...
Biden Is Only ‘Adding’ Jobs Because Americans Need Extra Side Hustles To Make Ends Meet
Democrats claim that the economy added 303,000 jobs in March — but it added no full-time jobs at all in March. The economy actually shed 6,000 full-time jobs that month. In fact, full-time employment in the United States has dropped in each of the past four months. Since November, there are 1,787,000 fewer Americans with full-time employment.
Many Added Jobs Are Government Jobs
A shrinking full-time workforce and an increasing “moonlighting” workforce are, of course, signs of a troubled economy. But there’s more. Nearly 25 percent (71,000) of the so-called “added” jobs are government jobs. Since government employees make up about 15 percent of all workers, the March figures disproportionately “add” government jobs to “the economy.”
https://thefederalist.com/2024/04/10/bi ... ends-meet/
R.Suave » 11 Apr 2024, 7:38 am » wrote: ↑ Household Survey Hustle....
You people are sooooo **** stupid.
I just did.ConsRule » 11 Apr 2024, 7:40 am » wrote: ↑ Then it should be very easy for you to post a link dispelling everything in the OP.
We'll wait.
You've done nothing of the sort... liar.R.Suave » 11 Apr 2024, 7:45 am » wrote: ↑ I just did.
But you'd have to understand what it is about the Household Survey that makes it so useful to econ hacks scribbling contrarian tripe for bitter slack jawed losers.
Because you know something about this....
More than you obviously... since you have added absolutely zero to this conversation.
*rippy38 » 11 Apr 2024, 6:41 am » wrote: ↑ Just as many of us have been saying all along...
Biden Is Only ‘Adding’ Jobs Because Americans Need Extra Side Hustles To Make Ends Meet
Democrats claim that the economy added 303,000 jobs in March — but it added no full-time jobs at all in March. The economy actually shed 6,000 full-time jobs that month. In fact, full-time employment in the United States has dropped in each of the past four months. Since November, there are 1,787,000 fewer Americans with full-time employment.
Many Added Jobs Are Government Jobs
A shrinking full-time workforce and an increasing “moonlighting” workforce are, of course, signs of a troubled economy. But there’s more. Nearly 25 percent (71,000) of the so-called “added” jobs are government jobs. Since government employees make up about 15 percent of all workers, the March figures disproportionately “add” government jobs to “the economy.”
https://thefederalist.com/2024/04/10/bi ... ends-meet/
Informed by what?Just as many of us have been saying all along
You still haven't posted anything except your own opinion... which amounts to dried **** in this case.R.Suave » 11 Apr 2024, 8:09 am » wrote: ↑ Informed by what?
Infotainers running the same Household Survey con.
It's my ZeroRecall Chronicler.
Only in the opinion of someone who LITERALLY doesn't know **** about bls surveys.*rippy38 » 11 Apr 2024, 8:10 am » wrote: ↑ You still haven't posted anything except your own opinion... which amounts to dried **** in this case.
![]()
Ignore the data...Buffalo » 11 Apr 2024, 8:10 am » wrote: ↑ What braindead biden fails to disclose when he touts adding nearly 15 MILLION jobs to the economy is the fact that all but about 5 MILLION of those jobs were jobs recovered that were lost during the dim-0-crap and deep state intentional plandemic of 2020. Very disingenuous and misleading!!!
Nearly 72 percent of all job gains since 2021 were simply jobs that were being recovered from the plandemic, not new job creation. In fact, when looking at today’s economy compared to pre-pandemic levels, employment is up only by 4.7 million.
A closer look at the jobs report also shows a deteriorating labor market. It is misleading at best for braindead to claim his incompetent administration of queers, trannys and *** is setting records with his failing, inflationary economic agenda.
R.Suave » 11 Apr 2024, 8:11 am » wrote: ↑ It's my ZeroRecall Chronicler.
No....it is something you understand if you work with the data.
You're entirely innumerate.
R.Suave » 11 Apr 2024, 7:45 am » wrote: ↑ I just did.
But you'd have to understand what it is about the Household Survey that makes it so useful to econ hacks scribbling contrarian tripe for bitter slack jawed losers.
Yet you STILL can't refute the OP... other than your usual "nuh uh!"R.Suave » 11 Apr 2024, 8:13 am » wrote: ↑ Only in the opinion of someone who LITERALLY doesn't know **** about bls surveys.
Rico doesn't need links.ConsRule » 11 Apr 2024, 8:18 am » wrote: ↑ No...you posted the words "Household Survey Hustle". There was no link dispelling anything in the OP. You do understand what a link is, don't you?
ConsRule » 11 Apr 2024, 8:18 am » wrote: ↑ No...you posted the words "Household Survey Hustle". There was no link dispelling anything in the OP. You do understand what a link is, don't you?
Are those my words?But you'd have to understand what it is about the Household Survey that makes it so useful to econ hacks scribbling contrarian tripe for bitter slack jawed losers
*rippy38 » 11 Apr 2024, 8:10 am » wrote: ↑ You still haven't posted anything except your own opinion... which amounts to dried **** in this case.
![]()