You know **** like that will ALWAYS be followed by a Stream of Bullzeet.Zeets2 » 11 Apr 2024, 9:50 am » wrote: ↑ Use your head for just a moment, fool!
If Americans LOST 1,787,000 full-time jobs over the past 5 months, WHAT DO YOU THINK THOSE LAID OFF WORKERS HAVE TO DO?
They have to take 2 or 3 PART-TIME jobs to make up for those full-time hours they lost! And since part-timer workers rarely qualify for health insurance, vacation time, sick days, or paid holidays, they're forced to work many more hours every week to make up for their loss, and usually at an hourly rate well below what they had on their full-time job.
Now, here's where it likely takes more brains than you have to grasp.
You do realize, of course, that Biden's 10 million new illegals are all getting free healthcare and free education for their children the minute they're welcomed into the country by Biden, don't you?
So when these job numbers are reported that you seem to think are SO terrific, HOW IS IT THAT YOU DON'T REALIZE THAT THE NUMBER OF JOBS CREATED IN CATEGORIES LIKE HEALTHCARE AND IN EDUCATION ARE BEING CREATED BECAUSE BIDEN'S ILLEGALS ARE GETTING THOSE SERVICES FOR FREE, ADDING NOTHING BUT MORE DEBT TO THE ECONOMY FOR TAXPAYING AMERICANS?
Those jobs in government, healthcare, and education last month amount to a total of 159,000 of those "new jobs" that you're SO proud of your idiot "creating"! And most or all of them are needed to pay for the 10 MILLION ILLEGALS THAT THE IDIOT IS FORCING TAXPAYERS TO PAY FOR!
And if you had a brain, you'd realize that those 6,000 full-time jobs that were lost last month ARE ACTUALLY A FAR WORSE TOTAL WHEN YOU ADD THOSE 159,000 ECONOMICALLY UNPRODUCTIVE JOBS THAT COST TAXPAYERS MONEY TO THE TOTAL! There is ZERO BENEFIT to the economy of ANY country WHEN YOU GIVE AWAY FREE SERVICES TO ILLEGALS!
Kinda bursts your bubble for your idiotic praise of your demented "leader", doesn't it?
Bidencrimefamily » 11 Apr 2024, 9:55 am » wrote: ↑ It's horrible Americans that need jobs can find them.
You will fix that problem huh buddy.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
ExactlyR.Suave » 11 Apr 2024, 9:55 am » wrote: ↑ You know **** like that will ALWAYS be followed by a Stream of Bullzeet.
Meanwhile
The reason for this year’s strong economic performance is not hard to identify. “The US economy in 2023 held up much better than expected, despite headwinds, in large part because of a resilient consumer,” said Jim Wiant, CEO of asset manager Capital Four US.
In fact, consumers not only spent in 2023 like they had money to burn, but they may still have significant dry powder. Following the US Bureau of Economic Analysis’ September Comprehensive Update of the National Economic Accounts data release, analysts reported that more than $1 trillion in savings may remain in consumer hands.
Given that the US consumer makes up around 70% of GDP, with that firepower, a post-pandemic recession may never arrive. On the other hand, that spending could stoke inflation, or at least prevent it from falling toward the Federal Reserve’s stated 2% goal. That, in turn, could entice the Fed to keep the fed funds target rate elevated, forestalling a now widely expected dovish pivot early in 2024.
https://pitchbook.com/news/articles/202 ... pportunity
Low paying **** jobs that pay min wage...yes, that is horrible.Bidencrimefamily » 11 Apr 2024, 9:57 am » wrote: ↑ Exactly
They got money because of jobs.
Oh no the american people got jobs and money.
Its horrible i tell you.
As always, Veghead is clueless.R.Suave » 11 Apr 2024, 9:55 am » wrote: ↑ You know **** like that will ALWAYS be followed by a Stream of Bullzeet.
Meanwhile
The reason for this year’s strong economic performance is not hard to identify. “The US economy in 2023 held up much better than expected, despite headwinds, in large part because of a resilient consumer,” said Jim Wiant, CEO of asset manager Capital Four US.
In fact, consumers not only spent in 2023 like they had money to burn, but they may still have significant dry powder. Following the US Bureau of Economic Analysis’ September Comprehensive Update of the National Economic Accounts data release, analysts reported that more than $1 trillion in savings may remain in consumer hands.
Given that the US consumer makes up around 70% of GDP, with that firepower, a post-pandemic recession may never arrive. On the other hand, that spending could stoke inflation, or at least prevent it from falling toward the Federal Reserve’s stated 2% goal. That, in turn, could entice the Fed to keep the fed funds target rate elevated, forestalling a now widely expected dovish pivot early in 2024.
https://pitchbook.com/news/articles/2024-us-distressed-outlook-will-weaker-credit-metrics-yield-opportunity
*mathematicallyR.Suave » 11 Apr 2024, 9:05 am » wrote: ↑ You're asserting that, but can't demonstrate it.
In fact, it's arithmetically impossible.
https://youtu.be/mTe2CIRBYHg?si=Y0_RTY1JKOoroMY9Vegas » 11 Apr 2024, 9:53 am » wrote: ↑ And there is the projection I was talking about. Were you looking into a mirror while writing this^^^![]()
![]()
My source is the BLS, and his is "pitchfork.com".
And how does your irrelevant post nullify the FACTS I listed that you think are ****?R.Suave » 11 Apr 2024, 9:55 am » wrote: ↑ You know **** like that will ALWAYS be followed by a Stream of Bullzeet.
Meanwhile
The reason for this year’s strong economic performance is not hard to identify. “The US economy in 2023 held up much better than expected, despite headwinds, in large part because of a resilient consumer,” said Jim Wiant, CEO of asset manager Capital Four US.
In fact, consumers not only spent in 2023 like they had money to burn, but they may still have significant dry powder. Following the US Bureau of Economic Analysis’ September Comprehensive Update of the National Economic Accounts data release, analysts reported that more than $1 trillion in savings may remain in consumer hands.
Given that the US consumer makes up around 70% of GDP, with that firepower, a post-pandemic recession may never arrive. On the other hand, that spending could stoke inflation, or at least prevent it from falling toward the Federal Reserve’s stated 2% goal. That, in turn, could entice the Fed to keep the fed funds target rate elevated, forestalling a now widely expected dovish pivot early in 2024.
https://pitchbook.com/news/articles/202 ... pportunity
I'm sure people are much happier working two or three **** jobs with no benefits than one good paying full time job with bennies... especially the ones that borrowed all that money for their useless college degrees.Bidencrimefamily » 11 Apr 2024, 9:35 am » wrote: ↑ So you're saying Americans need to have less options for employment.
So when they need jobs they dont have them available
You heard it first here folks.
The republurepublucanot have jobs when Americans need them.
Arithmetically.....to emphasize how obvious...
*rippy38 » 11 Apr 2024, 10:03 am » wrote: ↑ I'm sure people are much happier working two or three **** jobs with no benefits than one good paying full time job with bennies... especially the ones that borrowed all that money for their useless college degrees.
Bidenomics rules baby.
The BLS
Vegas » 11 Apr 2024, 10:02 am » wrote: ↑ What is survivorship bias?
1. Same incorrect definition
2. Turn it on me
More bullzeet.Zeets2 » 11 Apr 2024, 10:02 am » wrote: ↑ And how does your irrelevant post nullify the FACTS I listed that you think are ****?
Care to tell me what benefit the economy of a country gets when we have to hire 159,000 workers in a month to pay for the government benefits, healthcare, and hire teachers and administrators to give away for free to 10 million illegals?
Are you so dumb that you don't realize that hiring economically non-productive jobs does nothing beneficial for the country and raises the rates of inflation and interest rates?
Apparently!
I already have... twice in this thread.
Why Vegas will always be Level 0
It's a private equity analysis company...